Mr. Paolo Mendioro COURSE SYLLABUS and BACKGROUND Social responsibility is the exercise of authentic human relations and the pursuit of the COMMON GOOD
Done primarily as an INDIVIDUAL and then as an INSTITUTION.
There has been heightened interest in corporations to be sensitive to social, economic, and environmental issues.
The proper role of the corporation in society can therefore be defined as:
its continuing commitment to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large (World Business Council for Sustainable Development).
COURSE DESCRIPTION IPD-CSR is a non-academic, 3 unit course that focuses on the study of the proper role of corporations in society.
How it can contribute to economic, social and environmental sustainability.
The course framework is anchored on the social doctrine of the Church.
COURSE OBJECTIVES Throughout the course, students are expected to: Understand and appreciate social responsibility concepts and principles; Gain exposure to various social responsibility issues and cases in corporate settings, both in the Philippines and abroad; Develop concrete plans / strategies addressing actual CSR concerns of corporations as a way of translating their understanding and exposure to social responsibility concepts and cases. Reflect on the meaning of personal integrity, family responsibility, civic responsibility and universal charity as an expression of the culture of excellence
COURSE REQUIREMENTS Component Weight (% of Final Grade) Attendance, Class Discussion, Quizzes 30 Midterm Exam 20 Group Report* 20 Group Paper** 30 Total 100 * Group Report : Film Review and Case Study Analysis on the following topics: (1) Financial Crisis, (2) Corporate Governance, (3) Consumer Safety & Company Liability, (4) Ethics in Marketing & Advertising, and (5) Workplace Safety & Environmental Management
** Group Paper: A CSR Review of a corporation in a particular industry (e.g., Banks and Financials, Conglomerates, Commercial and Industrial, Consumer, Telecoms & Property). Present the CSR initiatives of the corporation and analyze their viability and authenticity given your understanding of what CSR is really all about.
GRADING SYSTEM Raw Score Grade Point Range 97-100 1 1.12-1 93-96 1.25 1.37-1.13 89-92 1.5 1.62-1.38 85-88 1.75 1.87-1.63 80-84 2 2.12-1.88 75-79 2.25 2.37-2.13 70-74 2.5 2.62-2.38 65-69 2.75 2.87-2.63 60-64 3 3-2.88 3.25-3.1 Below 60 3.5 3.5-3.26 FDA 3.5 General Guidelines GRADING: There will be NO INCOMPLETE GRADE; failure to submit assignments, reports, take quizzes, and the likes on agreed deadlines and without valid reasons* will automatically earn the student a failing mark for that specific requirement.
ABSENCES: Failure due to absences (FDA) policy is applied both for excused and unexcused absences. Make up quizzes and examinations are provided only for excused absences. In the summer term, a maximum of three (3) absences are allowed.
SUBMISSIONS: All papers (individual / group) must be submitted through Edmodo following this format: (1) Paper Size: letter size (8.5 x 11); Font: Garamond, Font Size: 12; Font Color: Black; Title Page: None, just place your name/s on top of the first page, left side; Paper Title: In Bold, Centered, leave one space before the first line of the paper; Line Spacing: 1.5; Paragraph Alignment: Left, not justified; Citation: APA format, footnotes or endnotes may be used as deemed necessary. Works caught to be plagiarized and those obtaining information from unreliable sources (e.g., Wikipedia) will automatically merit a grade of 3.5.
PRESENTATIONS: During class presentations or reporting, the assigned groups must see to it that the desired pieces of equipment (e.g., LCD projector, microphone) have been ensured for availability on the day of the presentation.
Consultations? Preferably by appointment; possible schedules are as follows: Monday-Friday, 4:00-5:00 PM (1600-1700H)
You may contact me via this e-mail address: paolo.mendioro@uap.asia
Edmodo group: IPDCSR-PSM code-6ysmr2 (join within 10 days of class start) References Argandoa, A. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Encyclical Caritas in Veritate. Working Paper. IESE Business School University of Navarra. Equal Work. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: Definitions and meanings. European Social Fund Initiative (ESF). Fontaine, C., Haarman, A., & Schmid, S. (2006). Stakeholder Theory. Edalys Le Developpement Durable Au Coeur de la Strategis D Enterprise. France. Hervada, J (1995). The Principles of the Social Doctrine of the Church. Taken from: www.columbia.edu on June 8, 2011. Kennedy-Glans, D. & Schulz, B. (2005). Corporate Integrity: A toolkit for managing beyond compliance. John Wiley & Sons, Canada, Ltd. Thomas, G. & Nowak, M. (2006). A working paper on Corporate Social Responsibility: A definition. Graduate School of Business, Curtin University of Technology. Shaw, W. H. & Barry, V. (2010). Moral Issues in Business. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. Belmont, CA. Tonello, M. (2011). The Business Case of Corporate Social Responsibility. The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation.