The document discusses several quantitative methods for analyzing gene expression and transcriptomes, including SAGE, microSAGE, LongSAGE, and CAGE. SAGE allows analysis of thousands of transcripts simultaneously but requires a large amount of input RNA. MicroSAGE is modified from SAGE and requires 500-5000x less starting material. LongSAGE generates longer tags than SAGE for increased specificity. CAGE collects 21bp from 5' cDNA ends to identify transcription initiation sites and promoters. These methods provide accurate quantitative and qualitative analysis of gene expression profiles.
The document discusses several quantitative methods for analyzing gene expression and transcriptomes, including SAGE, microSAGE, LongSAGE, and CAGE. SAGE allows analysis of thousands of transcripts simultaneously but requires a large amount of input RNA. MicroSAGE is modified from SAGE and requires 500-5000x less starting material. LongSAGE generates longer tags than SAGE for increased specificity. CAGE collects 21bp from 5' cDNA ends to identify transcription initiation sites and promoters. These methods provide accurate quantitative and qualitative analysis of gene expression profiles.
Original Description:
ppt
Original Title
Several Methods for Quantitative Analysis of the Transcriptome
The document discusses several quantitative methods for analyzing gene expression and transcriptomes, including SAGE, microSAGE, LongSAGE, and CAGE. SAGE allows analysis of thousands of transcripts simultaneously but requires a large amount of input RNA. MicroSAGE is modified from SAGE and requires 500-5000x less starting material. LongSAGE generates longer tags than SAGE for increased specificity. CAGE collects 21bp from 5' cDNA ends to identify transcription initiation sites and promoters. These methods provide accurate quantitative and qualitative analysis of gene expression profiles.
The document discusses several quantitative methods for analyzing gene expression and transcriptomes, including SAGE, microSAGE, LongSAGE, and CAGE. SAGE allows analysis of thousands of transcripts simultaneously but requires a large amount of input RNA. MicroSAGE is modified from SAGE and requires 500-5000x less starting material. LongSAGE generates longer tags than SAGE for increased specificity. CAGE collects 21bp from 5' cDNA ends to identify transcription initiation sites and promoters. These methods provide accurate quantitative and qualitative analysis of gene expression profiles.
gene expression Presented by R. Seeni Balaji (11b223) 9/6/2014 1 (SAGE) is a powerful expression profiling method, allowing the analysis of the expression of thousands of transcripts simultaneously.
A disadvantage of the method, however, is the relatively high amount of input RNA required. Consequently, SAGE cannot be used for the generation of expression profiles when RNA is limited 9/6/2014 2 In SAGE, short sequence tags (10 bp) are isolated from mRNA at a defined position, ligated to long multimers, cloned and sequenced. In addition, the short tags are long enough to uniquely identify the corresponding transcript in database searches. Thus, SAGE results in an accurate picture of gene expression at both the qualitative and the quantitative level. 9/6/2014 3
Analysis of changes in expression profiles in small or scarce biological samples, is not possible simply due to the fact that these tissue samples do not contain the required mRNA.
In such cases it is preferable to specifically isolate the cell population of interest for expression profiling, rather than using the complex tissue as a whole.
As disadvantage of SAGE is that it is characterized by a large number of sequential reactions and purifications, which can give rise to a significant loss of material. 9/6/2014 4 a modification of SAGE, named microSAGE, which requires 500- to 5000-fold less starting material. Compared with SAGE, microSAGE is simplified due to incorporation of a single-tube procedure for all steps from RNA isolation to tag release. 9/6/2014 5 Micro SAGE tissue selection RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis Anchoring and tagging of cDNA Ligation to ditags and PCR amplification Ditag isolation and concatenation Sequencing and analysis of clones 9/6/2014 6 LongSAGE The method LongSAGE is an adaptation of SAGE. Source : Saha et al. (2002) It generates labels longer than 14 to 21 base pairs and a restriction site for the endonuclease MmeI . Increased specificity of SAGE tags for transcript identification and SAGE tag mapping.
9/6/2014 7 Complete genome annotation relies on precise identification of transcription units bounded by a transcription initiation site (TIS) and a polyadenylation site (PAS). To facilitate this process, a set of two complementary methods, 5 Long serial analysis of gene expression (LS) and 3LS. The mapping of 5LS and 3LS tags to the genome allows the localization of TIS and PAS. 9/6/2014 8
9/6/2014 9 Advantages
the annotation of genomes is even more precise . expression profiles obtained are extremely accurate. later, it benefits from new techniques massively parallel sequencing (hundreds of millions of tags can be analyzed).
9/6/2014 10 The CAGE method Aims to identify TIS and promoters. Collects 21 bp from 5 ends of cap purified cDNA. Used in mouse and human transcriptome studies. The method essentially uses full-length cDNAs , to the 5 ends of which linkers are attached. This is followed by the cleavage of the first 20 base pairs by class II restriction enzymes, PCR, concatamerization, and cloning of the CAGE tags CAGE uses cap-trapping as the first step to capture the 5 ends of the cDNAs, which are then transformed into short sequence (tags) of 20 to 27