Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Hospitalizations and testing in

gastroparesis
Anwar Dudekula, Michael OConnell and Klaus
Bielefeldt
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 26 (2011) 12751282
Journal Reading
I!"OD#C!IO
$astroparesis defined by dela%ed e&pt%ing of
the sto&ach with chronic s%&pto&s, nausea,
'o&iting, postprandial (loating and)or
disco&fort*
Hospitaliation rates and duration of inpatient
stays in!rease disproportionally long
patient !on!erns" dra#ati! presentation repeated
$o#iting or pain %ospitaliation and repeated
diagnosti! testing&
2
Methods

!he stud% design + retrospecti'e chart


re'iew of patients in, or outpatient clinic of
the #ni'ersit% of -itts(urgh Medical Center
(etween .anuar% /001 and Dece&(er /002

Multi'ariate regression was used to


deter&ine predictors of hospital sta%s and
use of diagnostic testing*

!he stud% design + retrospecti'e chart


re'iew of patients in, or outpatient clinic of
the #ni'ersit% of -itts(urgh Medical Center
(etween .anuar% /001 and Dece&(er /002

Multi'ariate regression was used to


deter&ine predictors of hospital sta%s and
use of diagnostic testing*
'n!lusion
(elayed gastri! e#ptying
s!intigrap%y!ally (definite)
or !onfir#ed by endos!opi!
or radiograp%i! e$iden!e of
retained food in t%e
sto#a!% after 12 % of
fasting (probable)
)t least 1 typi!al sy#pto#
(nausea"$o#iting"postprandial
bloating"anore*ia"epigastri!
dis!o#fort) present #ore t%an
2 #ont%s
+*!lusion
(id not #eet in!lusion
!riteria
%ad gastri! outlet
obstru!tion or !%roni!
intestinal pseudoobstru!tion&
De&ographic infor&ation
Clinic encounters
underl%ing etiolog%
Emergency room visits,
-s%chiatric disorders
hospitalizations, hospital
days
Chronic pain s%ndro&e
3(ack pain, fi(ro&%algia,
headache4
diagnostic tests (upper
endoscopy, abdominal
CT, upper GI X-ray
gastric emptying studies)
the 5uantitati'e dela% in
gastric e&pt%ing of solids
and &edication use
The time beteen the inde!
and last encounter as
de"ined as "ollo up&
(ata abstra!tion fro# #edi!al re!ord
(
Hospitalization

#$% patient-years o" "ollo up&'%' visits


gastroenterologists, &$%# E( visits, )'& hospitalizations, total
%')# hospital days*

+ore clinic visits too, place during the "irst year (- . $*$&)
compared to years / through #, E( visits and hospitalization
rates did not vary signi"icantly beteen the years
"esults
,ost surgi!al
-.(
(/
'diopat%i!
,ost infe!tion
6ndoscop%

&%# endoscopies in %% patients ith time beteen


procedures o" &/*0 1&*2 months*

Indications3 nausea vomiting (/24), abdominal pain


(/&4), insertion enteral "eeding tube (&04), esophageal
symptoms (54), hematemesis ('4) or pyloric botulinum
to!in in6ection ('4)

(/#4) ere directly related to treatment and7or


demonstrated "indings that altered therapy

The remaining endoscopies did not show relevant


changes influenced treatment*
I&aging

/07 a(do&inal C! scans perfor&ed in


11 patients

&ain indication+ a(do&inal pain


389:4 of the listed reasons, followed
(% nausea 'o&iting 39:4

Association utilization and coe;isting chronic


pain s%ndro&e 3a4, opioid use 3(4 and
ps%chiatric co&or(idit% 3c4

"esults that alter patient &anage&ent were


identified in /0 37<:4 of the C! scans
0o pain $s pain
0o opioid $s opioid
0o psy $s psy
Disscussion

gastroparesis significant (urden for patients


and healthcare s%ste&, &ore than one third
re5uires e&ergenc% &edical care and
hospitalizations

6" 'isits and hospitalizations correlated with


diagnostic testing, endoscopies, a(do&inal =,
ra%s and C! scans

few results trul% affected therap% and thus


potentiall% altered outco&e
Disscussion

1e %ypot%esied pain is i#portant fa!tor


in resour!e utiliation

.%e ordering patterns for diagnosti!


testing 2ere !ertainly !onsistent &ost
C! scans and endoscop% listed
a(do&inal pain as &ain indication
>i&itations

large retrospe!ti$e !o%ort study in a tertiar%


referral center biased #ore !o#ple*
group re3uire #ore e*tensi$e !are

only 104 probable gastroparesis based on


food retention after a fast perfor#ed at
different ti#e and institutionsli#its dire!tly
!o#pare results

5nly !ases 2it% ele!troni! #edi!al re!ord


Conclusion

+ 7+ 1 patients e*perien!e signifi!ant sy#pto#s


fre3uent +R $isits" %ospitaliations and
diagnosti! testing

Dra&atic s%&pto&s (repeated $o#iting


abdo#inal pain" frustration) p* and p%ysi!ians
repeatedl% seek e;planations (e%ond the
known i&pair&ent of gastric function&
conclusion

&ost tests are onl% confir&ator%,


e;cluding unlikel% find other pro(le&s

increasing costs and unnecessar%


risks*

eed to educate patients and ph%sicians

a(out the li&ited utilit% and potential


har& of repeat assess&ents in chronic
functional disorders of the $I tract*
!HAK ?O#

You might also like