Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Power and Shutdown Level 2 Psa Study For Unit 1 of J. Bohunice V1 NPP
Full Power and Shutdown Level 2 Psa Study For Unit 1 of J. Bohunice V1 NPP
Conclusions
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
"/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
INTRODUCTION
$he level 2 PS +for full #ower, low #ower and shutdown o#erating
!odes- was develo#ed with the following ob.ectives/
to identify the ways in which radioactive releases fro! the #lant can occur
following the core da!age,
to calculate the !agnitudes and fre0uency of the release,
to #rovide insights into the #lant behaviour during a severe accident,
to #rovide a fra!ewor1 for understanding contain!ent failure !odes, the i!#act
of the #heno!ena that could occur during and following core da!age and have
the #otential to challenge the integrity of the confine!ent,
to su##ort the severe accident !anage!ent and develo#!ent of S23s.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
4/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
INTRODUCTION
$he level 2 PS !odel of the '. (ohunice )% *PP was develo#ed in the RISK SPEC$R42
Professional code.
$his !odel calculates the fre0uency of the individual release categories generating !ini!al
cut sets which involve the initiating event of the accident, co!#onent failures and hu!an
errors.
$he !agnitudes of release categories are calculated using/ the 2P56))ER for reactor
o#eration and shutdown !ode with closed reactor vessel and the 2ELCOR code for
shutdown !ode with o#en reactor vessel.
lthough the level % PS !ission ti!e is 25 h, the level 2 PS si!ulated accident se0uences
57 h to #rovide greater understanding of confine!ent #erfor!ance during the later stages of a
scenario. So, both the level 2 PS !ission ti!e and the deter!inistic analyses ti!e are 57 h.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
5/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
OVERVIEW OF THE LEVEL 2 PSA -ETHODOLO.Y
$hen, the confine!ent event tree +CE$- is develo#ed for each P"S as
#art of level 2 #robabilistic !odel.
In sa!e cases the level % event trees are changed before starting of EE$
construction. $he reason is in the definition of the event tree to# events.
$he following e9a!#le clarifies the #roble!. 3iven loss of the #ri!ary
to secondary side heat re!oval, failure of the #ri!ary bleed and feed
+to# event in the level % event trees- via the #ressuriAer safety valve
leads to the core da!age.
confine!ent isolation
BPSI
LPSI
Other events
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
1)/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
THE INTERFACE F LE!EL " AN# 2 $%A& $#%
$he criteria for binning the level % se0uences into the #lant da!age states
are based on the following five characteristics of each se0uence/
ECCS status + : water in.ected into the RP) or reactor cavity, core da!age
recovery #ossible, " : no water in.ected-
E>8$""$l "t$a0 $>+lo"(on. 4nli1ely event because the reactor cavity is dry.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
25/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CONFINE-ENT FAILURE -ODES 8 *nl(%$l5 4a(l*)$ 0o#$"
V$""$l t3)*"t 4o)!$1 $he !a9i!u! .et thrust force could not lift the
vessel and its internals, even without considering the ability of the vessel
su##ort structure to withstand the thrust load.
If the coolant loo# #i#ing and shield wall are considered, a !uch larger
force would be re0uired to dislodge the reactor vessel. Even if the vessel
could shirt, the confine!ent is configured in such a !anner that the
reaction forces cannot be trans!itted to the confine!ent wall.
$herefore, this #ostulated failure !ode is #revented by the #lant design.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
2(/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CONFINE-ENT FAILURE -ODES 8 *nl(%$l5 4a(l*)$ 0o#$"
F)o0 t3$ anal5"$" (t 2a" !on"(#$)$# t3at t3$ 0a(n !ont)(,*to) to t3$
4a(l*)$ o4 t3$ !on4(n$0$nt (" 4)o0 t3$ ('n(t(on o4 t3$ !o0,*"t(,l$ 'a"
0(>t*)$".
8or the (ohunice )% #lant the confine!ent ventilation syste! and the
(&S$ blow: down line !ust be isolated in case of the accident. 8ault
tree was develo#ed and involved into the level 2 PS !odel.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
"$/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CONFINE-ENT FAILURE -ODES 8 Con4(n$0$nt ,5+a""
<!on"(#$)$# $$nt=
$he !ost li1ely !echanis!s for this failure !ode, identified for the #lant
as being significant in ter!s of the #otential conse0uences, are S3
collector ru#ture +S3$2-, S3 tube ru#ture +S3$R- or interfacing
LOC.
*ote, however, that the S3$2 se0uences during the full #ower o#eration
contribute about <>I to the total core da!age fre0uency. Contribution to
the full #ower core da!age fre0uency fro! S3$R is <.5I and fro!
interfacing LOC is less than %I. $hese initiators are not do!inant fro!
the ris1 #oint of view during the reactor shutdown.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
"1/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CET"
$he general guidelines used for the develo#!ent of the CE$s are
su!!arised below/
: the initiating event of a CE$ is a P"S,
: the CE$ to# events and structure #rovide the details necessary to
characterise the fission #roduct source ter! releases,
: the CE$ considers factors which do!inate the confine!ent res#onseG
thus, the to# events consider broad categories of the confine!ent
behaviour,
: the CE$ considers early confine!ent failure ti!ing +i.e., confine!ent
failure at or shortly after vessel failure- and late confine!ent failureG
the results indicate significant i!#act fro! early and late hydrogen
detonation.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
"2/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CET" 8 -a(n a""*0+t(on"
.8or core da!age recovery only the BPSI and LPSI #u!#s of unit % are
consideredG BPSI #u!#s of unit 2 are not ta1en into consideration due to the
li!ited water sourcesG e9ternal water sources are also not considered for this
#ur#ose.
It is #ossibility to su##ly the RCS also by the s#ray syste! #u!#s. Bowever,
using a s#ray syste! #u!# for the core da!age recovery is not considered in
the !odel because these #u!#s !ust #erfor! other safety functions.
If the core da!age recovery for P"S with early C" is not #erfor!ed before
the vessel failure, recovery after the vessel failure is considered not to be
#ossible.
Isolation failure
Bydrogen detonation
"esign lea1age
$he blow:off line of % 2;; !! dia!eter +installed fro! the borated water
storage tan1 to the reactor hall- is the !ost do!inant lea1age #ath, if it is
not isolated.
$he design lea1age involves releases via CO8s and nor!al lea1age of the
confine!ent +the lea1age rate is 57 volu!e #ercent #er day-.
*R : no release
RC@.% : confine!ent by#ass after S3$2, stea! du!# station to the at!os#here
re:closed
RC@.2 : confine!ent by#ass after S3$2, stea! du!# station to the at!os#here
fails to re:close
RC7.% : confine!ent by#ass after S3$R, stea! du!# station to the at!os#here
re:closed
RC7.2 : confine!ent by#ass after S3$R, stea! du!# station to the at!os#here
fails to re:close
$he analysed se0uence was chosen because it had the 3('3$"t 4)$7*$n!5
of occurrence of any se0uence within the release category or because it
was e9#ected to bound all other se0uences of these category.
So, the large early release fre0uency +LER8- is given as a su! of the
following fre0uencies/
LER8 L RC< M RC=.% M RC>.% M RC@.% M RC@.2 M RC7.% M RC7.2 M
RC? L %.%=E:=6y
$he factors/
: Large confine!ent by#ass +recovery action-
: Bydrogen reco!biners
If the BPSI, LPSI #u!#s and confine!ent s#ray #u!#s are not lost in a
severe accident, then the critical co!#onents of these #u!#s can be
ade0uately cooled and !aintain o#erability in the recirculation !ode.
$he results indicate that, given core da!age, there is an 2=I #robability that the
confine!ent will successfully !aintain its integrity and #revent an uncontrolled
fission #roduct release. fter the i!#le!entation of the recovery actions for S3$2
and installation of hydrogen reco!biners in the confine!ent this #robability will be
increased to @5I. 8or co!#arison/ a western P&R #lant has the #robability of 75I.
$he !ost li1ely !ode of release fro! the confine!ent is a confine!ent by#ass after
S3$2 with conditional #robability of <;I. Late confine!ent failure +after > h- at
the vessel failure, with a conditional #robability of 22I, is the ne9t !ost li1ely !ode
of the fission #roduct release. 8inally, the confine!ent survives with the s#ray is
e9#ected to occur with a conditional #robability of =I #er core da!age event. $he
conditional #robability for the confine!ent isolation failure #robability without s#ray
is =I, for early confine!ent failure at the vessel failure is 5I, for other categories
%I or less.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
5$/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CONCLUSIONS
$he results of the level 2 PS indicate that there are vulnerabilities in the area of the
#rotection against hydrogen detonation. It re0uires i!!ediate attention to i!#rove the
#lant ris1 #rofile. In addition, attention !ust be #aid to develo#!ent of S23s in
coincidence with the conclusions of this study.
)ulnerability screening was #erfor!ed based on the screening criteria #rovided for 4S
#lants in NCriteria for Selecting I!#ortant Severe ccident Se0uencesO. $he criteria
states as follows/ Any functional sequence that has a core damage frequency greater
than or equal to 1.0E-6 per year and that leads to containment failure which results in a
radioactive release magnitude greater than or equal to P!-" release category of
A#$-1"00%. $he P&R:5 release category was esti!ated as %;I of the volatile fission
#roducts. 8or the full #ower o#eration two such release se0uences e9its for category
RC5.%, one se0uence for RC>.% and one se0uence for RC@.%. Bowever, the #ro#osed
!odifications will re!ove the se0uences fro! the list of the i!#ortant se0uences in
case of RC5.% and RC@.%.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
51/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CONCLUSIONS
$he shutdown ris1 is high for the o#en reactor vessel and o#en confine!ent. $he
reason is the high core da!age fre0uency in the shutdown o#erating !odes.
fter i!#le!entation of the reco!!ended shutdown sy!#to!:based e!ergency
#rocedures significant decrease of the shutdown ris1 is #ossible.
Installation of filtered venting syste! in the reactor hall with long ter! o#eration
could significantly decrease the release !agnitudes during the shutdown
o#erating !odes.
$he !ost i!#ortant feature of the confine!ent with res#ect to the fission #roduct
retention is its ability to re!ain intact in case of the stea! over:#ressurisation.
$his construction allows natural de#osition !echanis!s to re!ove the airborne
fission #roducts fro! the confine!ent at!os#here, and #rovides ade0uate ti!e
for the additional accident !itigation activities to be i!#le!ented.
.$he inability to get the water into the reactor cavity #revents the e9ternal cooling
of the intact reactor vessel.
$he absence of any #enetration in the lower vessel head cou#led with the natural
circulation in the #ri!ary syste! during a high #ressure core !elt is e9#ected to
induce cree# ru#ture failure in the hot leg #i#e #rior to the vessel failure.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
5"/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CONCLUSIONS
Retention of the core debris in a dry cavity !ay induce 2CCI !elt through the
cavity floor if the core debris cannot be cooled by the water.
In.ecting water through the failed reactor vessel, in an atte!#t to cool the core
debris in the cavity, is advisable and it does not de#end on the status of the
confine!ent cooling. In.ecting water into a cavity filled with the hot core debris
results in the for!ation of the hot stea!. If the confine!ent cooling is available
this stea! is condensed. If no confine!ent cooling is available stea!ing fro!
the cavity can eventually over:#ressurise the confine!ent but the CO8s #revent
the confine!ent failure. $he radiological release conse0uences of inducing a
CO8 o#ening are e9#ected to be lower than those associated with 2CCI failure
of the cavity floor.
RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services RELKO Ltd. Engineering and Consulting Services
54/54
International Workshop on Level 2 PSA and Severe Accident Management, 2!"1#"#2$$4 %oln, &erman'
CONCLUSIONS
Stea! inerting of the confine!ent during a severe accident can not #revent
hydrogen detonation in the (&S$.
$he insights gained through the analysis of the severe accident #rogression and
the detailed study of the related #heno!ena has #rovided a detailed
understanding of the #lant behaviour under the severe accident conditions. $he
1nowledge develo#ed can for! the basis for the future develo#!ents of S23s.