This document discusses the origins and development of contemporary management thought from early civilizations to the present. It outlines six major influences on modern management thinking: 1) Scientific Management pioneered by Frederick Taylor, 2) Henri Fayol's process view of management and identification of management principles, 3) the Human Relations Movement led by Elton Mayo and Fritz Roethlisberger, 4) Quantitative Approaches using mathematics and statistics, 5) Operations Research applying these methods to solve management problems, and 6) Linear Programming for allocating limited resources optimally. It provides details on the contributions and applications of these different approaches.
This document discusses the origins and development of contemporary management thought from early civilizations to the present. It outlines six major influences on modern management thinking: 1) Scientific Management pioneered by Frederick Taylor, 2) Henri Fayol's process view of management and identification of management principles, 3) the Human Relations Movement led by Elton Mayo and Fritz Roethlisberger, 4) Quantitative Approaches using mathematics and statistics, 5) Operations Research applying these methods to solve management problems, and 6) Linear Programming for allocating limited resources optimally. It provides details on the contributions and applications of these different approaches.
This document discusses the origins and development of contemporary management thought from early civilizations to the present. It outlines six major influences on modern management thinking: 1) Scientific Management pioneered by Frederick Taylor, 2) Henri Fayol's process view of management and identification of management principles, 3) the Human Relations Movement led by Elton Mayo and Fritz Roethlisberger, 4) Quantitative Approaches using mathematics and statistics, 5) Operations Research applying these methods to solve management problems, and 6) Linear Programming for allocating limited resources optimally. It provides details on the contributions and applications of these different approaches.
This document discusses the origins and development of contemporary management thought from early civilizations to the present. It outlines six major influences on modern management thinking: 1) Scientific Management pioneered by Frederick Taylor, 2) Henri Fayol's process view of management and identification of management principles, 3) the Human Relations Movement led by Elton Mayo and Fritz Roethlisberger, 4) Quantitative Approaches using mathematics and statistics, 5) Operations Research applying these methods to solve management problems, and 6) Linear Programming for allocating limited resources optimally. It provides details on the contributions and applications of these different approaches.
Management concepts probably evolved from the time man
began undertaking organized activities in groups. Among the early civilizations, the capacity for complex forms of organized activity clearly existed as evidence by their ability to govern large territories and populations, wage long wars, construct structures like pyramids and canals, etc. Though systematic writing about management did not exist until this century, Claude eorge, in his !istory of Management Thought traces the development of management ideas among the di"erent civilizations from early history up to the present century. ORIGINS OF MODERN MANAGEMENT Most management writers trace the beginnings of modern management thinking to writings which began in the early part of this century. The Six Major Infuences 1) Scientifc Management #s a type of management which is characterized and guided by the use of scienti$c approaches to the solution of managerial problems in business and industry. Frederick W. Taylor is known as the Father of Scientifc Management that put emphasis that organizations placed on production. According to his study that any ma%or problem confronting an organization could be resolve if management would scienti$cally determine and communicate to employees their expected output of the employees and improve the operating e&ciency of management. !e also viewed workers as an economic utility, whose motivation to wo'k stemmed from their $nancial needs, (that workers had to produced more at a lower cost and that they would enable them to increase their earnings.) That the cornerstone of *cienti$c Management was use of time and motion study for increasing worker+s e&ciency using machine. Time study , concerned with the amount of time it takes to complete a tasks Motion study , is concerned with the e&ciency of the motion involved in performing a task. 2) Henri Fayol and the rocess !iew of Management !e was a -rench industrialist who wrote about management on the basis of his experience, he was also an engineer by training. !e looked at management from a broader perspective, that of de$ning the task of managing an industrial enterprise as a whole. !e was the $rst to de$ne management as consisting of the functions of planning, organizing, coordinating, commanding and controlling. -ayol identi$ed several "#rinci#les of management$ such as. !"# Uni$% o& Co''an( , states that the more often an individual reports to a single superior, the more likely it is that the individual will feel a sense of loyalty and obligation and the less likely it is that there will be confusion about instructions. !"! Uni$% o& Direc$ion , the principles that there should be a single set of goals and ob%ectives that uni$es the activities of every one in an organization. !") Inse*ara+i,i$% o& Au$hori$% an( Res*onsi+i,i$% , this principles says that if a person is responsible for accomplishing a certain task in the organization, he should be given su&cient authority to accomplish that task. !"-Sca,ar Princi*,e , this principles suggest that there must be a clear line of authority running step by step from the highest to the lowest level of the organization. This clear line of authority will make it easier for organizational members to understand, a/ to whom they can delegate0 b/ who can delegate to them0 c/ to whom they are accountable !". Princi*,es o& S*ecia,i/a$ion , this principles states that an organizational unit becomes more e&cient the more it specializes in the performance of a set of similar or related activities overtime. !"0 Princi*,es o& Cen$ra,i/a$ion , this principles believes that managers should retain $nal responsibility but also need to give their subordinates enough authority to do their %obs properly. %entrali&ation , decreasing the role of subordinates in decision making 'ecentrali&ation , increasing their role in decision making. !"1 Princi*,es o& Es*ri$ (e Cor*s , this principles promote team spirit that will give the organization a sense of unity. 1ne way to achieve this spirit is to use verbal communication instead of formal written communication. Also includes are the following. 2/ 3ivision of 4abor, 5/ 3iscipline, 6/ *ubordination of individual interests to the common goal, 7/ 'emuneration, 8/ The 1rder, 9/ :;uity, </ #nitiative and =/ *tability of Tenure !is conception of the nature of management and the principle of organization which he proposed were more fundamental and general than those proposed by his predecessor, and continue to be in>uential even today. There are also other principles in management which also important according to !enri -ayol, such as. () The Human )elations Mo*ement An approach that seeks to stimulate cooperative on the basis of an understanding of and genuine concern for employees as individual and as members of a work group :lton Mayo and -ritz 'oethlisberger are the two names associated with the development of this school of thoughts. Mayo and 'oethlisberger interpret the results of the experiment in a very di"erent way. The increased of productivity observed in the experiment as mainly a response of the workers to the psychological not the physical environment in the experimental situation. They argued that social and psychological factors, e.g. giving workers as a sense of importance, overcoming workers suspicions about management, the in>uence of the informal groups to which workers belonged, where potentially more important variably in improving worker performance than the work methods and other physical factors in the work environment in which scienti$c management movement of that time was preoccupied with.
+) The ,uantitati*e -##roaches to Management
An approach to management that emphasizes the use of advance mathematics and statistics and the application of information and systems theory. 1ne of the ma%or components of contemporary management literature is the contributions of the ;uantitative science, mathematics and statistics. The e"ort to de$ne management problems more precisely in ;uantitative tern is old science @orld @ar ##. Acko" and *asieni, the methods of ;uantitative sciences $rst found systematic application in the war e"ort in Aritain in early days of @@##. The initial application of the ;uantitative sickness was called O*era$ions Research or OR so called because the study teams were assigned to $eld commanders to solve problems involving actual operation in the war e"orts. Acko" and *asieni identify the following stages in the operations research approach in solving management problems. 7.2 -ormulating problems 7.5 Constructing the model 7.6 3eriving the solutions 7.7 Testing the model and evaluating the solution 7.8 #mplementing and maintaining the solution Aefore problem solving can begin the ma%or elements of the problem must be identi$ed. 1nce the ma%or elements of the problem have been identi$ed, the 1' team must begin to formulate the problem in speci$c terms, you must de$ne what elements of the problems can be changed by a decision and what criteria the proposed solution will have to meet. To determine the best solution to the problems various solution must b e tested. Bou can experiment in the real worth with changes in prices, production rates and personnel to $nd a good solution. Bou can construct a mathematical model that symbolically incorporates the elements of the problems. 1nce the basic model has been constructed, a solution to the problem must be derived. The values of controllable variables will be changed and each change the model will be analyzed. The best values that best meet the manager+s ob%ectives will represent the solution to the problems. The entire process will be meaningless to the manager unless the $ndings are implemented. #t is the manger who must apply the $ndings. Exa'*,es o& O*era$ions Research Mo(e,s 2hich ha3e &oun( 2i(es*rea( a**,ica$ions in +usiness inc,u(e #4 In3en$or% Mo(e, , are among those best approached through 1' techni;ues because they involve the balancing of con>icting ob%ectives. Managers should also be concerned with maintaining inventories at the optimum level considering the operating re;uirements and $nancial resources of the business. #nade;uate stock of raw materials could disrupt production and lose sales. The classical inventory model for :conomic 1rder Cuantity D:1C/ consider two ma%or components of inventory costs namely. #"# Ho,(in5 Cos$s , consist of the desired rate of return on the investment in inventory and other costs like insurance, warehousing and storage expenses. #"! Or(erin5 Cos$s , refer to the costs of procuring the inventory items like the clerical salaries of the purchasing department sta". !4 6inear Pro5ra''in5 76P4 , typically deals with the problem of allocating limited resources among competing activities in the best possible or optimal way, 4inear Erogramming are widely used to determine the best way to allocate limited resources to achieve some desired end. The problems for which linear programming might be used and those that can be expressed in terms of linear F that is directly proportional,relationships. )4 Re*,ace'en$ Pro+,e's , *ome expensive items in an organization will deteriorate overtime or become obsolete , machinery and trucks are obvious examples. #f they kept for too long a period of time, they become ine&cient and increasingly expensive to operate. 1n the other hand replacing them may also involve considerable costs. 1ne type of problem is to decide exactly when such items must be replaced. -4 8ueuin59:ai$in5 6ine Mo(e,s , are develop to help managers decide how long a waiting line would be most preferable. The models will predict the probable result of various changes in the system involved. #f trucks arrive at a loading platform at the rate of approximately 5G minutes to load each truck, a ;ueue or waiting line will form when trucks arrive late or when the loading pace slow down. There are cost associated with such a waiting line, and these costs increase as the line grows F gasoline expenses if engines are idling, truck driver wages, and tra&c congestion. .4 Se;uencin5 an( Coor(ina$ion , *e;uencing problem arise when we have to decide in what order the parts of a %ob are to be performed. #n a factory assembly line, a product must pass through several work stations before it is completed. 1n a poorly planned line, some stations will be idle while others are over burdened. The problem is to se;uence the work stations in such a way that idle time is minimized and working time at all stations is roughly e;ualized. The ;uantitative approaches thus far are most widely used in production management and $nance. .) The Systems -##roach Attempts to view the organization as a uni$ed, purposeful system composed of interrelated parts. 'ather than dealing separately with the various parts of an organization, the system approach tries to give managers a way of looking at organization as a whole. *ystem theory tells us that the activities of any part of an organization a"ects the activity of every other parts. A s%s$e' , is de$ned as a set of elements which are related to each other in a certain way. A system has both s$ruc$ure Dconsisting of its elements/ and *rocess Dthe way the elements interact to produce a given outcome or results/. At the $rm level, systems concepts are useful given the multidimensionality of many problems within the $rm, and as a way of relating the $rm to many external variables in its environment. /) Management and %ulture The origins of contemporary management thoughts and practices would be incomplete if it did not consider a more recent change in perspective concerning the nature of management activity. The cross cultural research in management had previously shown that managerial practices di"ered in countries with di"erent cultural traditions, such research generally assumed that industrialization possessed its own logics which would ultimately lead to the same or similar practices of management everywhere.