This document discusses microfinancing initiatives and SME financing in Pakistan. It provides:
1) A brief history of microfinancing in Pakistan starting from the 1980s with NGOs and expanding to include specialized microfinance banks by the 2000s.
2) An overview of the types of organizations involved in SME financing in Pakistan including NGOs, microfinance banks, leasing companies and commercial banks. It also discusses the challenges with SME financing from both the perspective of banks and SMEs.
3) Details on credit delivery interventions used to support different categories of SMEs from non-bankable to bankable, including direct lending facilities, credit guarantees and wholesale lending.
This document discusses microfinancing initiatives and SME financing in Pakistan. It provides:
1) A brief history of microfinancing in Pakistan starting from the 1980s with NGOs and expanding to include specialized microfinance banks by the 2000s.
2) An overview of the types of organizations involved in SME financing in Pakistan including NGOs, microfinance banks, leasing companies and commercial banks. It also discusses the challenges with SME financing from both the perspective of banks and SMEs.
3) Details on credit delivery interventions used to support different categories of SMEs from non-bankable to bankable, including direct lending facilities, credit guarantees and wholesale lending.
This document discusses microfinancing initiatives and SME financing in Pakistan. It provides:
1) A brief history of microfinancing in Pakistan starting from the 1980s with NGOs and expanding to include specialized microfinance banks by the 2000s.
2) An overview of the types of organizations involved in SME financing in Pakistan including NGOs, microfinance banks, leasing companies and commercial banks. It also discusses the challenges with SME financing from both the perspective of banks and SMEs.
3) Details on credit delivery interventions used to support different categories of SMEs from non-bankable to bankable, including direct lending facilities, credit guarantees and wholesale lending.
( Pakistan) INITATIVES An Analysis of SMEs The Financing Point of View Development Solutions
from and MTI SBIR First Microfinance Bank Network Leasing Histor y 1982 First NGOs: AKRSP, OPP 1992 NRSP 1994 1995 Bank of Khyber 1997 KASHF & PMN 2000 PPAF & Khushhali Bank 2002 NGOs: 22 RSPs: 4 MF Banks: 4(+1) Leasing: 2(+2) Banks: 1 (+?) Govt. Subsidized Small Farmer Lending 1970s What are banks doing? Shareholders in Khushhalibank Increasing consumer financing Lines of credit and cash management for NGOs Declining direct outreach to poor?
Limited vision of microfinance and few partnerships
Active Borrowers 510,000 Outreac h Gross Loan Portfolio Rs. 5 Billion MF Banks 30% Leasing 17% Bank 6% RSPs 32% NGOs 15% RSPs 41% NGOs 26% MF Banks 30% Leasing 1% Bank 2%
Information asymmetry ( lack of information on SMEs at various levels - industry, regional and company ). SMEs are high risk due to: Limited capital flexibility Vulnerability to market changes Inadequate management capability Short business/industry track record Inferior collateral offering Problems in SME Financing ( From the Point of View of the Banks ) High transaction cost of loan packaging/ administration relative to mostly low loan-absorptive capacity of SMEs Long processing time and poor service High interest rates Problems in SME Financing ( From the Point of View of SMEs ) Voluminous documentation Largely inaccessible, as offered by banks due to: High loan floor, effectively barring SMEs Nature/size of collateral requirement Years of business experience required Types of SMEs The Financing Point of View from Significant credit track record Sufficient collateral Already Bankable SMEs Substantial business track record and/or size Established management systems Absence of or limited credit track record Absence of or inferior collateral Near Bankable SMEs Substantial business track record and/or size Established management systems Absence of credit track record or, in the case of recovering SMEs negative track record Absence of or inferior collateral Non-Bankable (But Promising) SMEs Limited management systems Limited business track record and/or size SMEs Banks & Other Funding Orgs Credit Delivery Intervention For Already Bankable SMEs Wholesale funds Helps SMEs get lower interest rates Helps SMEs get longer repayment terms Helps SMEs in the province access credit (liquidity for the provincial financing system) For Near Bankable SMEs Credit guarantees Helps SMEs enter into the formal financing system Helps banks open-up and learn more on how to finance near bankable SMEs For Non-Bankable but Promising SMEs Direct Loans Helps SMEs access credit at better rates relative to informal sources Trains SMEs in formal financing and in starting a credit track record Helps an SME grow in its industry and to a respectable size over time with continuous financing The SMEs & Other Credit Delivery Intervention Direct Lending Credit Guarantees Wholesale Lending Non- Bankable SMEs Near Bankable SMEs Bankable SMEs Direct Lending Facilities of SMEs Group Short-Term Facilities (one year or less) 1. SME-FRIEND - short-term financing of export orders 2. SME-FIRST - short-term financing of receivables (eventually POs) of suppliers of top 1,000 corps. Loan Purpose: Transactional Working Capital Direct Lending Facilities ---Continued Medium-Term Facilities (above one year up to five years) 1. SME-FORCE - medium-term financing of start-up or expanding franchisees 2. SME-GUIDE - medium-term financing of SME projects endorsed by DTI-POs Loan Purpose: Production Upgrading/Expansion Industry-based Direct Lending Facilities
1. Shoe Industry (already approved by SBC Board) 2. Cable Operators (pipeline) 3. Bakeshop Operators (pipeline) Endorsement Required: Technical assessment by the industry association on the proposed expansion Loan Purpose: (Production Upgrading/Expansion) Direct Lending Facilities SME-FEEL - financing of micro-finance conduits Loan Purpose: Temporary Working Capital Medium-Term Facilities (above one year up to five years) Basic Documentary Requirements a. Filled-up Application Form b. In-house Financial Statements c. Registration Papers d. Applicable Endorsement Procedures for Loan Avail-ments a. SME submits basic documentary requirements to SMEs Bank. b. SMEs conducts project visit c. evaluates loan application d. informs SME of status of loan e. If approved, facilitates loan release documents f. Releases loan (Land bank Cheque)
Financial Facilities Funding source used by PAK fast growing SMEs - first own funds then,, 42% 19% 13% 11% 7% 4% 3% 1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Banks Family&friends Customers Other Public offerings Private investors Venture capitalists Vendor& suppliers Source: SMEDA(2007) Leading practices of fast growth entrepreneurs Fin Assistance in SMES PAK Org/Banks/NGO SME Bank All other Banks Listed with SBP First Women Bank Koshali Bank Agha Khan Foundation European Union
GTZ (German & Dutch NGO) Oxfam CSF (USAID)Program Several Pak NGOs World Bank ADB Pak Business Finance Borrowers: Resident Pakistani Nationals. Facility: Running Finance/Term Finance. Financing Limits: Maximum up to Rs.3Million-Small Business Enterprise. Maximum upto Rs.50 Million-Medium Business Enterprise. Business Finance Primary Security: Mortgage of property.
Mode of Financing: a) Running Finance: One year line of credit (renewable). b) Term Finance: Maximum up to 7 years (with 2 years grace period). Business Finance Repayment:
a) Running Finance: Monthly debt servicing on the outstanding balance.
b) Term Finance: Monthly installments. Markup Rates: 13.5 to 14 % Business Finance Eligibility to Apply : Age: Between 25 to 65 Years. Borrowers: Resident Pakistani Nationals. Business Finance Business Requirements: a) Minimum one year's business or professional experience in the present business (in case of small business enterprise) and minimum five years business or professional experience in the present business (in case of medium business finance). b) Member of the relevant trade body (in case of medium business enterprise) or relevant professional association (in case of self employed professional).
However ,, if you chose venture capital? Who are the venture capital providers and what do they want?
Types of venture capitalists (VC): 1. Business angels Often previous entrepreneurs that have sold thir firms Often older actors with knowledge of the market and you => they may like to help you 2. Venture capital firms / funds A) Small actors e.g. SME Bank have 548 members Often specialised on a financing or market segment e.g. seed financing, growth financing, MBO/IPO or biotech, ICT, construction B) Large institutional VCs in Pakistan C) Corporate VC e.g. The venture capitalist looks at: 1. THE GROWTH POTENTIAL OF THE FIRM The most important for a VC is often how fast and how much a firm to be financed can grow How can the management perform that growth ,, is a standard key question Realism versus dreams? Competence and already shown results i.e. sales
The venture capitalist looks at: 2. THE MANAGEMT TEAM
Will these people deliver what they say they will? The father of venture capital G.Doroit: Bet on the jockey not the horse How big is the risk that key personnel will leave the firm. All managers should be owners Note that receiving financing relates to trust Relevant experience is important Venture capitalists formula It is the expectations that are crucial in valuations of a listed or not listed firm How is a firm that you may buy 10 % of valued? It is a complex and time dependent issue The expected p/e value is important as well as the size i.e. total sale One way to value a firm is to use the venture capitalist formula, i.e. a version of the standard NPV Venture capitalist formula (VCF) a simple way Assume that a venture capitalist has estimated that the likely profit of a firm is 100 after 3 years from now and that the profit can be assumed to stay at that level. Then you can assume that the firm value after 3 years is: 10 * 100 = 1000. However, what do you today pay for something that perhaps after 3 years is worth 1000? NPV or VCF gives that if you are a VC with a discount rate (r) of 50% so is the firm valued at 1000/(1+0,50) 3
~296,3 today. And 10% of the firm is then worth ~ less than 29,6 for the investor However, if r vc = 20% ,, so is the venture capitalist willing to value the firm at 578,7. And if r vc = 100%? VCF Note that in an exam it is that simple. However, in reality it is more complex. In the real world the venture capitalist may want to control the firm (more than 50% of the votes) so that he can push the development of the firm. However, VCs are often happy with 10-30% of the firm in the first financing round, and less in the second financing round. Is there really buyers out there? The usual way that a VC exits is through industry sale. So you have to work on that concept. IPO is hard! To buy out the VC is not that common ,, Impact On Poverty Focus on poor: 30% of GDP per capita
Focus on rural & agriculture: 70% of loans Shifting with recent developments PPAF: 9% Increase in income KASHF: 15% Increase in income and social benefits PMN Seminar Paper December 2003 mixed picture Need more data Could do more to reach poorer people Limited Outreach: challenge & opportunity Role of NGOs, MF Banks, Commercial banks, Leasing? Need for clear vision and focused business plans to attain sustainability. Future? Partnerships for scale and sustainability towards an inclusive financial sector that includes everyone?
Diversification & New Initiatives: microinsurance, housing loans, larger enterprise loans, better application of technology. Challenges & Issues Thank you.