Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Workers' Participation in John Leitch Has Defined Industrial Democracy As
Workers' Participation in John Leitch Has Defined Industrial Democracy As
Workers' Participation in John Leitch Has Defined Industrial Democracy As
Management
John Leitch has defined Industrial Democracy as “the organisation of
any factory or other business institution into a little democratic state
with a representative government which shall have both the
legislative and executive phases”.
6. Reduced Resistance to Change. Last but not the least, it should be noted that
changes are arbitrarily introduced from above without explanation. Subordinates
tend to feel insecure and take counter measures aimed at sabotage of changes.
But when they have participated in the decision making process, they have had
an opportunity to be heard. They know what to expect and why. Their resistance
to change is reduced.
Pre–requisites for the
success of Workers’
Participation in beManagement
I. The overall climate in the organisation should be favourable to
workers’ participation. There should an attitude of mutual co-operation,
confidence, and respect for each other. Management, in particular, should
be genuinely receptive to the labour’s ideas so that the latter can perceive
that their ideas are useful.
II. There must be sufficient time to participate before action is required;
because participation in emergent situations is hardly advisable.
III. The subject of participation must be relevant to the enterprise; it
must concern something in which both the parties are interested,
otherwise the parties are likely to become indifferent to the process of
participation.
IV. The workers’ representatives should have the ability such as
intelligence and knowledge, to participate. It is not appropriate to ask
workers to participate in technical aspects of the machinery; but they can
participate successfully in problems relating to their work. The
contributions made by the workers should be worthwhile and should
benefit the workers in the long run. It should be in the interest of the
management as well! Now maintaining that balance is not that easy but
that is what experience is all about!!
Pre–requisites for the
success of Workers’
There must be effective system of communication. Both labour’s representatives and
Participation in Management
management’s representatives must be able to understand each other and express
themselves without any inhibitions. The whole idea after all is to be able to speak out
one’s mind and listen to the counterpart’s point of view!
VI. Participation should not adversely affect the status or authority of the
participants. Managers will not participate, if their authority is threatened. Workers will
hesitate in participating if they think that their status is being adversely affected. In fact
for worker’s participation to be effective, both the management and the labour should
get rid of their ego problems and share their ideas. I am sure that you will agree that no
relationship can continue for long if there are ego clashes. Both the parties should make
efforts to come closer rather than moving away.
VII. The financial cost of participation should always be lesser than the benefits-both
economic and non-economic-of participation. We all can understand the economic
aspect but as far as the non-economic part is concerned, it will depend on the
organisations. What I can tell you at this point of time is that the pains and pleasures
should be matched! The pleasures should be much more as compared to the pains.
VIII. Participation should be within the framework of overall policy of the enterprise in
question .I am sure you will agree that every decision has to be in line with the Vision
and Mission statements of the organisation.
FOR MORE USEFUL EDUCATIONAL
PRESENTATIONS AND
TECHNOLOGICAL
DOCUMENTATIONS LIKE THESE
VISIT
WWW.THECODEXPERT.COM