Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hedge Funds - IIM Raipur
Hedge Funds - IIM Raipur
Hedge Funds - IIM Raipur
Targeted Investments
They can invest in any type of asset class or opportunity luring in the any market,
be it
options,
derivatives,
equities,
bonds,
undervalued securities,
currencies,
Commodities
events such as mergers or bankruptcies,
domestic as well as international markets where they can expect to receive
attractive returns in all kind of risky situations.
In other words
Attempting to minimize the risk i.e. to hedge.
Protecting capital (i.e. the private pool of funds)
Generating superior returns in all kinds of markets (they are ready to take
bearish markets also)
Hedging Strategies
There are approximately 14 distinct investment strategies used by
hedge funds
Key: All hedge funds are not the same. The investment returns, volatility, and
risk vary enormously among the different strategies
The long-bias hedge fund strategy essentially serves as an investment halfway house in between a market-neutral fund
and a long-only fund. Rather than putting on positions that cancel out as found in a market neutral fund, or having
substantial long exposure as in a long-only fund, a long-bias fund maintains a differing ratio of long positions
(compared to short positions) that usually exceeds 40%. With this definition in mind, a hedge fund with a long/short
equity strategy could transition into a long-bias hedge fund, and vice versa, depending on how its assets were
allocated.
this type of long/short strategy, for example, investing at a 130/30 ratio of long to short (130% long and 30% short),
or 120/20, are known as long bias strategies. Fewer hedge funds employ a short bias over the longer term, as equity
markets tend to move up over time.
Convertible Arbitrage
Event Driven
Focus on events of corporate life cycle like acquisitions, buybacks, demerger, spinoffs etc,.
Merger/Risk Arbitrage
Focus on the companies which are going through any merger or takeover
Both the acquiring company and the target.
The risk is deal risk rather than a market risk.
Managed Futures
-Strategic investment or arbitrage in futures(usually Commodities and Currency)
-Spot-future arbitrage
-Contango and Backwardation arbitrage
-Calendar spread in futures
Market Directional
-Market momentum strategy
-for very short term
-example is Jobbing
Things to Note:
FICTION: All hedge funds are volatile -- they all place large directional bets on
securities and commodities, while using lots of leverage
FACT: Less than 5% of hedge funds are global macro funds. Most hedge funds
use derivatives only for hedging or don't use derivatives at all, and many use
no leverage.
Some hedge funds don't actually hedge against risk. The term is applied to a
wide range of alternative funds, and encompasses funds that use high-risk
strategies without hedging against risk of loss
Differences (Contd.)
Performance Evaluation:
Mutual funds are measured on relative performance compared
to a relevant index or to other mutual funds in their sector
Hedge funds are expected to deliver absolute returns under all
circumstances, even when the relative indices are down
Level of Regulation:
Unlike hedge funds, mutual funds are highly regulated,
restricting the use of short selling and derivatives. Makes it
difficult to outperform market, or protect assets in downturn.
Differences (Contd.)
Portfolio Protection
Mutual funds are not able to effectively protect portfolios against declining
markets other than by going into cash or by shorting a limited amount of
stock index futures
Hedge funds are often able to protect against declining markets by using
various hedging strategies, and can generate positive returns even in
declining markets.
Differences (Contd.)
Dependence on Markets
Fund of Funds
A fund of funds mixes the most successful hedge funds and other pooled investment
vehicles, spreading investments among many different funds or investment vehicles
Hedge fund strategies are complex and varied in their ranges of risk/return. Even
within a particular style, two managers can apply different amounts of hedging or
insurance and leverage to his/her portfolio
A fund of funds blends together funds of different strategies and asset classes in
order to accomplish:
More consistent return (than any of the individual funds)
Spreading out the risks among a variety of funds
Meeting a range of investor risk/return objectives
Indian Context
Asian countries are offering many opportunities
huge meltdowns
investors are finding hard to sustain there
money making options are drying
Why India?
Investment can be made through FII (Foreign Institutional Investors)
route.
Doesnt charge anything on performance or profit of the fund
35,000
2035-2050
30,000
2020-2035
2006-2020
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
China
India
United
States
Brazil
Mexico
Indonesia
Russia
United Germany
Kingdom
Japan
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
-0.50%
-1.00%
-1.50%
First
Implication
Essentials for
HFs
Second
Implication
Registration
Uncorrelated
returns
Increase in
demand
Independent
audit
Surge in
earnings
Increase
competition
Transparency
Reducing
investment
fees
Proper
disclosure
2007
Bull Run
Q-India, Halbis, Baer Capital, Insynergy & FMG outperformed major
hedge fund indices.
2008
2009
2010
http://www.karvycapital.com/hedge.aspx
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/markets/indian-hedge-fundsoutperform-sensex-over-the-last-year/article6397094.ece
http://www.funds-europe.com/news/14240-emerging-markethedge-funds-see-positive-performance
http://www.mydigitalfc.com/hedge-fund/13-hedge-funds-get-sebiapproval-555
HFRX
The Hedge Fund Research Index
Most Widely followed index for Hedge Fund Performance
It is comprised of all eligible hedge fund strategies. All strategies are equally
weighted.
Evaluates the performance of Hedge Funds based on Absolute Return and the
Relative Risk.
As a component of the optimization process, the index selects constituents
which exhibit lower volatilities and lower correlations to standard directional
benchmarks of equity market and hedge fund industry performance.
HFRX India is an index for the Indian Hedge Funds.
HFRX Returns
10
09
08
07
06
Avg
Stdev
Min
Max
Rank
5.19
13.4
(23.25)
9.26
2.72
1.46
14.40
(23.25)
13.4
Equal Weighted
Strategies
5.29
11.44
(21.9)
8.83
1.28
0.99
13.35
(21.9)
11.44
Absolute Return
(0.12)
(3.58)
(13.09)
7.43
(0.03)
(1.88)
7.45
(13.09)
7.43
11
Market Directional
9.32
29.34
(29.7)
10.45
4.2
4.72
21.48
(29.7)
29.34
Convertible
Arbitrage
8.76
42.46
(58.37)
9.57
(5.69)
(0.65)
36.77
(58.37)
42.46
10
Distressed Securities
8.34
(5.6)
(30.69)
9.56
1.21
(3.44)
16.41
(30.69)
9.56
12
Equity Hedge
8.92
13.14
(25.45)
9.23
4.19
2.01
15.67
(25.45)
13.14
Equity Market
Neutral
2.64
(5.56)
(1.16)
4.76
0.21
0.18
3.93
(5.56)
4.76
Event Driven
1.98
16.59
(22.11)
10.32
2.81
1.92
14.70
(22.11)
16.59
(1.73)
(8.78)
5.61
5.61
6.67
1.48
6.64
(8.78)
6.67
Merger Arbitrage
5.69
8.14
3.69
10.73
3.72
6.39
3.03
3.69
10.73
Relative Value
Arbitrage
7.65
38.47
(37.6)
10.65
(0.97)
3.64
27.39
(37.6)
38.47
Macro
Avg
Min
Max
Rank
3.24
-2.79
0.11
1.04
0.50
2.18
-2.79
3.24
0.81
2.04
-2.19
2.51
1.8
0.99
1.89
-2.19
2.51
Event Driven
0.6
1.6
-1.46
1.64
1.03
0.68
1.27
-1.46
1.64
0.38
0.3
1.01
1.29
0.86
0.77
0.42
0.3
1.29
Global Macro
0.69
0.48
0.98
1.21
0.39
0.75
0.34
0.39
1.21
Long/Short Equity
0.58
1.47
-0.85
1.5
1.02
0.74
0.97
-0.85
1.5
Managed Futures
1.14
-1.08
2.29
1.39
0.99
0.95
1.24
-1.08
2.29
10
0.9
Emerging Markets
Stdev
Evolution of HF strategies
Empirical Findings
Returns are considerably high during a volatile market which is mean reverting in
nature
Returns during a trending market in some of the HF strategies is low and even
negative in some cases
Well established and High Corpus HFs give a lower returns compared to the
relatively newer peers who have small corpus
John Paulson
(HF: Paulson and Co.)
His claim to fame is his pay check for 2007: he is reported to have made $3.7 billion.
Strategy: Short-selling sub prime mortgage
He made a profit of $15 billion for his investors in 2007. His flagship fund
George Soros
(HF: Soros Fund Management)
Short sold 10 Billion pounds in 1992 and made 1.1 Billion $ in a single
day (Black Wednesday)
Similar speculation over the currency of Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN) in 1997
As of March 2012 Soros was listed 22nd in Forbs among the richest
people in the world
Christopher Hohn
The hedge fund he manages reportedly lost $1 billion in a single month,
June 2008. The size of his hedge fund went from $8 billion to $7billion.
Interestingly Hohn was a topper at HBS.
Other smart people who lost money through Hedge Funds are the
Noble Laureates Myron S. Scholes and Robert C. Merton (The LTCM
case)
Regulatory Constraints
Restricting participation:
The Alternative Investment Fund shall not accept from an investor an
investment of value less than rupees one crore. Further, the AIF shall have a
minimum corpus of Rs. 20 crore.
For recent
figures refer
Figure 11.1
of text book
page 222
Exhibit 11.2 Hedge Funds Leveraged Assets Fell from $6.6 Trillion to $2.4 Trillion in Less Than a One-Year Period
Assets under management and estimated total investable assets1, $ in trillions
Leverage through derivative positions
Leverage through debt
Assets under management
4.8
2.9
1.5
Implied
Leverage
Ratio2 (total)
3.4
6.5
6.6
3.3
3.9
-64%
3.6
2.6
1.7
1.3
1.5
2.4
0.7
0.8
0.4
1.0
0.6
1.1
1.4
1.9
1.9
1.4
0.9
0.3
1.2
2004
2005
2006
2007
H1-08
H2-08
Q1-09
2.9
3.1
3.4
3.4
3.5
2.6
2.0
0.8
Note 1: Includes leverage from debt and off-balance sheet leverage through derivatives and other instruments
Note 2: Leverage ratio = (total leverage + AUM) / AUM
Source: McKinsey Global Institute; Global Capital Markets Survey; Dresdner Kleinwort Equity Research; International
Financial Services, London; Financial Risk Management, Ltd.; Financial Services Authority
For recent
figures refer
Figure 11.2
of text book
page 223
Exhibit 11.3 (1 of 2)
1990 20008
12,000
10,096
9,462
9,176
8,661
10,000
7,436
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
6,297
5,379
4,454
3,873
3,325
3,617
2,7812,990
1,945 2,383
1,514
610 821 1,105
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
For recent
figures refer
Figure 11.3
of text book
page 223
Exhibit 11.3 (2 of 2)
1990 20008
9,000
Fund of Funds
8,000
7,634
7,241
6,808
6,665
Hedge Funds
7,000
5,782
5,065
4,598
3,904
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
1,277
3,102 3,335
2,5642,848
2,006
2,392
1,654
781
530 694 937
515 538 550
477
426
389
377
291
80 127 168 237
2,462
2,368
1,996 2,221
1,654
1,232
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
For recent
figures refer
Figure 11.4
of text book
page 224
Exhibit 11.4 (1 of 2)
2,000
1,800
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
90 91
92
93
94
95 96
97
98
99
00 01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
For recent
figures refer
Figure 11.5
of text book
page 224
Exhibit 11.4 (2 of 2)
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
For recent
figures refer
Figure 11.6
of text book
page 226
Exhibit 11.5
61%
14%
9%
7%
9%
8%
9%
8%
23%
18%
31% 30%
High net-worth
individuals
31% 32%
12% 12%
10% 8% 8%
7%
12% 11%
11%
7%
7% 8%
8% 7%
9%
12% 14% 15% 15% 15% 15% 12% 11% 14% 15%
5% 10%
Pension funds
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Source: McKinsey Global Institute; Hennessee Group LLC; International Financial Services, London estimates
For recent
table 11.1
of text book
page 227
Exhibit 11.6
Firm
Bridgewater Associates
J.P. Morgan
Paulson & Co.
D.E. Shaw Group
Brevan Howard1
Och-Ziff Capital Management
Man AHL1
Soros Fund Management
Goldman Sachs Asset Management1
Farallon Capital Management2
Renaissance Technologies2
Region
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
Europe
U.S.
Europe
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
U.S.
AUM ($bn)
38.6
32.9
29.0
28.6
26.8
22.1
22.0
21.0
20.6
20.0
20.0
For recent
figures refer
Figure 11.7
of text book
page 227
Exhibit 11.7
Hedge Fund Revenues are Highly Concentrated in the Top 205 Funds
205 funds
13%
18%
<$2 bn (5,000+
funds)
Source: McKinsey Global Institute; Lipper Hedge World; Merrill Lynch; McKinsey Global Institute hedge fund
interviews
Exhibit 11.8
4%
2%
0%
-2%
-4%
-6%
-8%
Note: A bull market (denoted in green shading) is a 20% rally preceded by a 20% decline in the DJIA; a bear market
(denoted in red shading) is a 20% decline preceded by a 20% rally in the DJIA.
Source: Hedge Fund Research, Inc.; DJIA data provided by Commodity Systems Inc.
Dec-08
Jun-08
Dec-07
Jun-07
Dec-06
Jun-06
Dec-05
Jun-05
Dec-04
Jun-04
Dec-03
Jun-03
Dec-02
Jun-02
Dec-01
Jun-01
Dec-00
Jun-00
Dec-99
Jun-99
Dec-98
Jun-98
Dec-97
Jun-97
Dec-96
Jun-96
Dec-95
Jun-95
-10%
Dec-94
For recent
figures refer
Figure 11.8
of text book
page 229
Since 1990, Hedge Fund Strategies Have Outperformed Both Bonds and
Equities (Even Accounting for Risk)
Exhibit 11.9
Risk vs. return for hedge fund strategies compared to blended portfolios of bonds and equities,
1990 - 2008
15
Macro
14
Equity Hedge
Average Return %
13
Event-Driven
12
11
Relative Value
10
Portfolio composition:
Standard Deviation %
Source: McKinsey Global Institute; Hedge Fund Research, Inc.; Datastream
10
11
12
13
Exhibit 11.10
Average annual returns (net of fees) by strategy for risk-adjusted quartiles, 2001 2007, %
Equity Hedge
1st
Quartile
Macro
Event-Driven
19.4
2nd
Quartile
31.3
11.2
3rd
Quartile
0.4
4th
Quartile
0.2
2.4 6.1
19.0
15.4
2.4 6.1
13.6
13.9
12.7
4.1
Relative Value
9.9
4.0
-2.6
7.5
2.2
2.4 6.1
2.4 6.1
S&P 500
Lehman US
Aggregate
Bond Index
Note 1: Quartiles are defined based on risk-adjusted performance, defined using fund Sharpe ratio between 2001 and
2007. The Sharpe ratio is given by Average (R Rf) / Standard Deviation (R), where R is the return and the benchmark
rate Rf is the S&P 500 average between 2001 and 2007 (2.43%).
Source: McKinsey Global Institute; Hedge Fund Research, Inc.
o Top quartile hedge funds are able to achieve outsized alphas (as high as 15% annually), based on
data from a period of a few years.4
These findings suggest that investing in market indices can be a reasonable and less expensive
alternative to expensive hedge funds (with the exception of top performing hedge funds).
It is important to note that there are limitations to these observations as imperfect data can create a
number of biases:
Although difficult to aggregate the effect of all of these biases, by some estimates, just survivorship
and backfill bias together can inflate industry returns by as much as 4%.5
Note 1: Hasanhodzic, Jasmina and Andrew W. Lo, Can hedge-fund returns be replicated?: The linear case. Journal of
Investment Management, Q2 2007, Vol. 5, No. 2.
Note 2: Fung, William, et al. Hedge funds: Performance, risk, and capital formation. AFA 2007 Chicago Meetings
paper, 19 Jul. 2006.
Note 3: Ibbotson, Roger G. and Peng Chen. The A,B,Cs of hedge funds: Alphas, betas and costs. Yale ICF working
paper, Sep. 2006.
Note 4: Kosowski, Robert, et al. Do hedge funds deliver alpha? A Bayesian and bootstrap analysis. Journal of
Financial Economics, Vol. 84, No. 1, Apr. 2007, pp. 229-64.
Note 5: Fung, William and David Hsieh. Hedge funds: An industry in its adolescence. Federal Reserve Bank of
Atlanta, Economic Review, Q4 2006, Vol. 91, No. 4.
Source: Farrell, Diana, et al. The New Power Brokers: How Oil, Asia, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Are Shaping the
Global Capital Markets. McKinsey Global Institute Oct. 2007.
Exhibit 11.12
Comparison of Hedge Fund Returns to the S&P 500 Indexs Returns, 2000 2008
4.9%
-10.1%
4.4%
9.6%
9.0%
13.9%
13.6% 12.6%
7.6%
3.0%
3.5%
3.0%
Hedge funds
-13.0%
-19.1%
S&P 500
-23.4%
-38.5%
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Source: Credit Suisse/Tremont; S&P 500 data provided by Commodity Systems Inc.
2006
2007
2008
Fund managers and their investors are trying to figure out what went wrong. One conclusion: Too
many funds bought the same assets. As markets fell in September and October, and hedge funds came
under pressure, many moved to sell investments, sending prices even lower and causing losses for
other funds that hadn't yet sold.
Stocks favored by hedge funds performed even worse than the overall market, according to data from
Goldman Sachs. An index of 50 stocks "that matter most" to hedge funds lost nearly 45%, including
dividends, compared with a loss of 38.5% on the S&P 500.
Source: Zuckerman, Gregory and Jenny Strasburg. For Many Hedge Funds, No Escape. Wall Street Journal 2 Jan.
2009.
Exhibit 11.14
50
High-Yield Bonds
30
25
60
30
45
Distressed Debt
Leveraged Loans
47
32
Source: McKinsey Global Institute; NYSE; LSE; U.S. Bond Market Association; IMF; Greenwich Associates; Financial
News; Gartmore; Stern School of Business; British Bankers Association; ISDA; McKinsey CIB practice
Exhibit 11.15
Gating
The illiquidity of hedge funds often means that, even if investors realize the manager of their fund has
run into trouble, it could be months before they can get their money back. Even then, arrangements
called gates may restrict the proportion of an investors holdings that can be redeemed. Hedge fund
managers use gates to control redemptions during difficult markets. For example, in the throes of the
subprime mortgage meltdown of 2007, an article in the New York Times blog DealBook described
how the Bear Stearns Asset-Based Securities Fund had moved to suspend investor redemptions.
According to a Bear spokesman, *+ we believe by suspending redemptions we can ensure the best
long term results for our investors *+ we dont believe it is prudent or in the interest of our investors
to sell assets in the current market environment. The ability of the Bear Stearns hedge fund managers
to suspend investor redemptions illustrates the power of gating. Because the fund had incurred serious
losses, investors in the fund likely would have pulled their money out were they not bound by gates.
Thus, gating allows hedge fund managers to have greater control over their investors funds by
preventing investors from obtaining redemptions at inopportune times.
Source: DealBook, Third Bear Stearns Fund Skids on Mortgages. New York Times 1 Aug. 2007.
Exhibit 11.16 (1 of 2) Recent Hedge Fund IPOs Have Underperformed the Broader Market
Fortress Investment Group (NYSE:FIG) versus the S&P 500 Index
February 9, 2007 (IPO date) to December 31, 2008
20%
0%
-20%
-40%
-60%
-80%
FIG
S&P 500
-100%
-120%
Feb-07 Apr-07 Jun-07 Aug-07 Oct-07 Dec-07 Feb-08 Apr-08 Jun-08 Aug-08 Oct-08 Dec-08
Exhibit 11.16 (2 of 2) Recent Hedge Fund IPOs Have Underperformed the Broader Market
Och-Ziff Capital Management Group LLC (NYSE:OZM) versus the S&P 500 Index
November 14, 2007 (IPO date) to December 31, 2008
10%
0%
-10%
-20%
-30%
-40%
-50%
-60%
-70%
OZM
S&P 500
-80%
-90%
-100%
Nov-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Mar-08
May-08
Jun-08
Aug-08
Sep-08
Nov-08
Dec-08
Exhibit 11.17
Operational efficiencies
o Legal due diligence and document negotiation
o Consolidated accounting, performance and financial reporting
o Cash flow management