Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Secretary of State's Presentation To State Election Board
Secretary of State's Presentation To State Election Board
Applican
t drops
from
system
Mails or
delivers to
SOS or
county
registrar
Applicant
does not
respond
within 40
days or with
proper
verification
Applicant
supplies
necessary
documentation
to county
registrar
If data matches
existing voter,
info is updated
and new
signature
captured
PROCESS ENDS
County
registrar
enters all
data in VR
System
County sends
letter asking for
more information
for verification
Applicant is
Applicant is
VERIFIED by
DDS for ID
and
citizenship
UNVERIFIED
Voter is
registered
Providing Fraudulent
Information, O.C.G.A. 21-2-562
Sensitive
identity
informatio
n
This is where
the voter signs
the oath
Warning against
forgery and
false
information
Identity of person
who obtained
signature and
Aug. 20
Aug. 21
Aug. 12
Aug.
26
Sept. 10
May
5
Sept
10
Sept. 5
Sept.
10
Sept.
10
Sept.
10
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Butts County
Reported May 5, 2014 (First report
from any source)
People given inaccurate information
about being required to re-register in
order to vote
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Henry County
Reported August 12, 2014
8 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
6 confirmed forgeries
2 unknown
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
DeKalb County
First Reported August 20, 2014
Additional Report September 5, 2014
4 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
3 confirmed forgeries
3 forged waivers allowing NGP to store
personal information
1 unknown application
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Gwinnett County
First Reported August 21, 2014
Additional Report September 4, 2014
8 suspicious VRA cards
3 confirmed forgeries
4 unknown
1 confirmed legitimate
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Cobb County
Reported August 26, 2014
3 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
1 confirmed forgery
2 confirmed legitimate
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Bartow County
Reported September 5, 2014
Over month-long delay in returning
completed Voter Registration
Applications
False information given to voters from
NGP about voters being required to reregister in order to vote with ID Card
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Muscogee County
Reported September 5, 2014
6 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
3 Confirmed forgeries
3 unknown
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Coweta County
Reported September 9, 2014
15 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
10 confirmed legitimate (all 10 from the
same person who admitted he was just
helping his friends working in NGP get
their numbers)
5 unknown
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Terrell County
Reported September 10, 2014
3 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
3 confirmed forgeries
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Toombs County
Reported September 10, 2014
6 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
3 confirmed forgeries on applications
3 unknown applications
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Tattnall County
Reported September 10, 2014
3 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
2 confirmed forgeries
1 unknown
Suspicious VR Applications
as of September 16, 2014
Effingham County
Reported September 10, 2014
6 Suspicious Voter Registration
Applications
1 confirmed valid application
5 unknown
Preliminary Totals
25 Confirmed Forged Voter
Registration Applications in seven
counties
26 Suspicious, but unconfirmed
Voter Registration Applications in
other counties
14 Confirmed Valid Voter
Registration Applications (1 voter
registered 10 times)
3 Confirmed Forged waivers of
Unknowns?
The applications that are
UNKNOWN are combinations of:
Non-existent addresses
Non-identifiable names and/or
biographical information
No contact made with voter to verify
application
Forged Registration
Scenario
Forged
applicati
on
submitte
d
Voter is
informed
their vote
didnt count
because
signature
did not
match VRA
County processes
application and retains
latest (forged)
signature
County
compares
signature on
ballot and
VRA and
REJECTS the
ballot or
petition
Voter
gets no
notificati
on
Voter
votes
absentee
ballot
Voter
signs
petition
Providing Fraudulent
Information, O.C.G.A. 21-2-562
183-1-6.02(7)(f) accepting an
unsealed, completed voter registration
application without signed
acknowledgement from the registrant
183-1-6.02(7)(g) copying a completed
registration application without the
written permission of the applicant
What We Seek
Our previous interactions with NGP have
produced records that show specific
connections between NGP members and
specific forged documents
We need to make these connections and
identify other evidence of fraud
We need to identify counties that might
have unidentified problems
We need to identify individuals who
participated in this conduct