Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aggravated Assault and Domestic Violence: Criminal Laws, S2 2014, Class 13
Aggravated Assault and Domestic Violence: Criminal Laws, S2 2014, Class 13
Revision
1.) What is the difference between assault and battery?
2.) What are the three categories of harm for the purposes of aggravated
assault, and what are the differences between them?
3.) Can words (such as a telephone call) constitute the actus reus of an
assault?
4.) Can an omission constitute the actus reus of an assault?
5.) What type of recklessness is required as the mens rea for assault?
Aggravated Assault
More serious than common assault because of the presence of
additional aggravating elements (either harm or consequence
caused, or specific intent)
Other Examples
33 Wounding or grievous bodily harm with intent
harm
(b) is reckless as to causing actual bodily harm to that or any other person, is guilty of an offence.
(b) is reckless as to causing actual bodily harm to that or any other person, is guilty of an offence.
Other Examples
25A Assault causing death
(1)A person is guilty of an offence under this subsection if:
(a) the person assaults another person by intentionally hitting the
other person with any part of the persons body or with an object
held by the person, and
(b) the assault is not authorised or excused by law, and
(c) the assault causes the death of the other person.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 20 years.
54 Causing grievous bodily harm
Causing a Disease
Section 4: Definitions
"Grievous bodily harm" includes:
(a)the destruction (other than in the course of a medical procedure) of the foetus of a pregnant
woman, whether or not the woman suffers any other harm, and
(b)any permanent or serious disfiguring of the person, and
(c)any grievous bodily disease (in which case a reference to the infliction of grievous bodily
harm includes a reference to causing a person to contract a grievous bodily disease).
Second Reading Speech (Hatzistergos)
simply reckless as to the possibility, that is to say that he or she does not care whether
the disease is passed on
Coleman: realisation by the accused of the particular kind of harm tha tmight be inflicted
Policy rationale
Increasing or undermining responsibility (e.g. with regard to testing)?
sends, or delivers to, or causes to be taken, or received by, any person, any
explosive substance, or other dangerous or noxious thing, or
puts or lays at any place, or casts or throws at, or upon, or otherwise applies
to, any person, any corrosive fluid or any destructive or explosive substance,
with intent in any such case to burn maim disfigure disable, or do grievous bodily
harm to, any person, shall, whether bodily injury is effected or not, be liable to
imprisonment for 25 years.
officers
Whosoever:
assaults any person with intent to commit a serious indictable offence, or
assaults, resists, or wilfully obstructs any officer while in the execution of his or her
duty, such officer being a constable, or other peace officer, custom-house officer, prison
officer, sheriffs officer, or bailiff, or any person acting in aid of such officer, or
assaults any person, with intent to resist or prevent the lawful apprehension or detainer
of any person for any offence,
shall be liable to imprisonment for 5 years.
Patterns of Victimisation
Under-reporting
Interpersonal violence as personal interaction
Two main types of interpersonal violence
Factors contributing to violence
Violence in licensed premises: in-house matters?
Differences between two main types of violence
Violence in Aboriginal communities
Dangers of soft policy/education approaches?
Domestic Violence
Statistics
Working-class vs petit bourgeois violence
Task Force on Domestic Violence (1981)
Crimes (Domestic Violence) Amendment Act 1982, 1983
Improvements
Limits/remaining problems
Domestic Relationship
Section 5
Meaning of domestic relationship
For the purposes of this Act, a person has a "domestic relationship" with another
person if the person:
(c) has or has had an intimate personal relationship with the other person,
whether or not the intimate relationship involves or has involved a relationship of a
sexual nature, or
(d) is living or has lived in the same household as the other person, or
(e) is living or has lived as a long-term resident in the same residential facility
as the other person and at the same time as the other person or
(f) has or has had a relationship involving his or her dependence on the
ongoing paid or unpaid care of the other person, or
Restrictions: s 35
(2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), an apprehended violence order made by a court
may impose any or all of the following prohibitions or restrictions:
(b) prohibiting or restricting access by the defendant to any or all of the following:
(i) to any premises occupied by the protected person from time to time or to any
specified premises occupied by the protected person,
(ii) to any place where the protected person works from time to time or to any specified
place of work of the protected person,
(c) prohibiting or restricting the defendant from approaching the protected person, or any such
premises or place, within 12 hours of consuming intoxicating liquor or illicit drugs,
(d) prohibiting or restricting the possession of all or any specified firearms or prohibited
weapons (within the meaning of the Weapons Prohibition Act 1998) by the defendant,
(e) prohibiting the defendant from destroying or deliberately damaging or interfering with the
protected persons property,
(f) prohibiting or restricting specified behaviour by the defendant that might affect the protected
person.
(2) For the purposes of this section, causing a person to fear physical
or mental harm includes causing the person to fear physical or mental
harm to another person with whom he or she has a domestic relationship.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a person intends to cause fear of
physical or mental harm if he or she knows that the conduct is likely to
cause fear in the other person.
(4) For the purposes of this section, the prosecution is not required to
prove that the person alleged to have been stalked or intimidated
actually feared physical or mental harm.