Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2009 Presentation by Manoj Nath, Constantino Belo & Oscar Da Silva On Community Inclusive Infrastructure For Development
2009 Presentation by Manoj Nath, Constantino Belo & Oscar Da Silva On Community Inclusive Infrastructure For Development
2009 Presentation by Manoj Nath, Constantino Belo & Oscar Da Silva On Community Inclusive Infrastructure For Development
Infrastructure Development in
Timor Leste
Manoj Nath
Constantino Belo
Oscar da Silva
RWSSP, July 07, 2009
Background
Government priority on Road and Water
MDGs by sector
2009 figures based on - targets from TL –MDG targets set in 2004
Investment for MDG
• Rural Water Supply $100 million
• Rural Sanitation $ 21 million
Past Experience
Use of international best practice through Donor funded initiatives
(ADB: Road)
2. Section 4
– Community managed water supply systems – management through a
water users group
3. Section 8
– Coordination with other Government Organizations
– Responsibilities of heads of other agencies to ensure integration and
coordination of plans, strategies, programs and activities
– District administrators’ and other departments’ responsibility to develop
water management plans
Commitment..
4. Section 22
A Water Management Group is not a legal entity
5. Section 24
Allows a WMG (GMF) to raise revenue to
manage water services
The Players Promoting Community
Driven Development
• Ministry of Infrastructure (DNSAS)
• Ministry of State Administration (PDL)
• Ministry Economy and Rural Development
• Donors, NGOs, other agencies
Issues
• 55-65 percent of the water systems stop
fully or partially within 2-3 years time
• Parallel systems without much emphasis
on cooperation and synergy
• Best practices do not get attention for
institutionalization
• Budget for socially inclusive planning
and community capacity building
(Social Development)
Questions
• Do we identify activities through an inclusive approach?
• Do we engage with each stakeholder group within a
community?
• Does our analysis include concerns of critical groups
(women, poor)
• Do we assist the communities with design choices and
engage with these groups to take a decision?
• Do we assist analyzing the O&M issues during planning
stage?
Community Engagement Process
in RWSSP