Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PGC1alpha Gly482Ser Polymorphism Is Associated With Habitual Levels of Physical Activity
PGC1alpha Gly482Ser Polymorphism Is Associated With Habitual Levels of Physical Activity
of Physical Activity
Nanci S Guest, Andrea R Josse, Ahmed El-Sohemy
NUTRITIONAL SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO, TORONTO, ON, CANADA
ABSTRACT
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma co-activator-1alpha
(PGC1alpha) gene has been shown to play an important role in skeletal muscle
and energy metabolism. This has implications for exercise performance and
physiology, and may also influence disease risk pathways. Genetic variation in
PCG1alpha may affect habitual physical activity (PA) levels. We aimed to
determine whether the Gly482Ser (rs8192678) polymorphism in the PCG1alpha
gene affects habitual PA levels and if this in turn affects biomarkers of
cardiometabolic risk (e.g. glucose, Insulin, triglycerides, cholesterol) body
mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC). Fasting blood samples were
collected and DNA was analyzed from Caucasian subjects (n=722) aged 20-29
years from the Toronto Nutrigenomics and Health Study (TNH). Subjects
completed questionnaires on PA and general health. PA was quantified as
metabolic task equivalent (MET) hrs/wk. Subjects were divided into 2 groups
according to the median PA level of 8 MET-hrs/wk. We examined the Gly482Ser
polymorphism against the 2 levels of PA using logistic regression adjusted for
age, sex, and BMI. We then assessed whether cardiometabolic risk factors,
BMI, WC and mean levels of PA differed between genotypes using ANCOVA.
Individuals who were Ser/Ser homozygous were significantly more physically
active than Gly/Gly homozygotes, but Gly/Ser heterozygotes were not.
Compared to those with the Gly/Gly genotype, the OR (95% CIs) for the Gly/Ser
and Ser/Ser genotypes were 1.15 (0.84-1.58) and 2.21 (1.34-3.63), respectively.
Mean levels of PA were greater for Ser/Ser ([MeanSE] 9.00.3 MET-hrs/wk)
than Gly/Gly (8.00.2 MET-hrs/wk) (P=0.014), but not with Gly/Ser (8.30.2 METhrs/wk). There were no significant differences between genotypes for any
cardiometabolic risk or anthropometric biomarkers. In summary, the Gly482Ser
polymorphism in the PCG1alpha gene is associated with habitual PA levels
such that subjects with the Ser/Ser genotype have higher PA levels than those
with the Gly/Gly genotype. Further study is needed to elucidate the mechanism
by which this variant in PGC1alpha affects PA levels.
INTRODUCTION
In contrast, the 482Ser allele has been associated with cardiometabolic risk
factor biomarkers such as high blood pressure [8] as well as type 2 diabetes [9,
10] and obesity [11, 12] possibly through PCG1-alphas regulatory function in
lipid and carbohydrate metabolism [1]
This has implications for exercise performance and physiology, and may also
influence disease risk pathways. Associations between the Gly482Ser
polymorphism of the PCG1alpha gene with habitual physical activity levels and
cardiometabolic risk factors have not been studied in a young adult population.
OBJECTIVES
METHODS
RESULTS
Study Design and Participants: Subjects were part of the Toronto Nutrigenomics and Health (TNH) study, a cross-sectional
examination of Caucasian (n=722) men and women aged 20-29 years. Participants gave a fasting blood sample and completed a
general health and lifestyle questionnaire (GHLQ), including a physical activity questionnaire, and a food frequency questionnaire.
Anthropometric measurements, including height, weight, BMI, WC and resting blood pressure were taken when participants were
dressed in light clothing and no shoes, as described previously [13]
Physical Activity (PA) Assessment: Habitual PA was measured by questionnaire and was expressed as metabolic equivalent task
(MET)-hours per week. Habitual (over the previous month) weekday and weekend activity was recorded separately and then combined to
total 7 days. PA MET intensity levels were assigned based on previously published work [14]
Genotyping: The Gly482Ser (rs8192678) SNP was genotyped using the iPLEX Gold assay on the Sequenom MassARRAY platform at
the Clinical Genomics Centre (Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON)[13]
Statistical Analyses: Statistical analyses were carried out using SAS (version 9.2; SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA). Subjects were
divided into 2 groups according to the median PA level of 8 MET-hrs/wk to carry out the logistic regression analysis (median PA level by
genotype)
RESULTS
Characteristic
Age (y)
Female sex (%)
BMI (kg/m2)
Waist Circumference (cm)
Energy intake (kcal/d)
Energy from carbohydrates (%
per day)
Energy from protein (% per day)
Energy from fat (% per day)
Sucrose (g/d)
Alcohol intake (g/d)
23.12
70
23.36
76.05
2013.07
> 8 MET
hrs/wk
2.56
p-value
23.39 2.58
67
3.52
23.34 3.5
8.86
75.59 8.71
606.94 2097.06 686.55
52.07 7.94
16.7 2.82
30.92 6.46
45.96 23.11
7.57 9.37
52.04 8.31
16.88 3.38
30.51 6.53
49.07 25.68
9.36 12.48
0.15
0.20
0.93
0.47
0.08
8 MET hrs/wk
GG
23.52 3.4
GA (n=308)
AA (n=88)
8.3 3.1
9.0 2.7*
48
33
52
0.008
1.14 (0.83 1.55)
1.15 (0.84 1.58)
67
0.97
0.43
0.4
0.18
0.03
GA
AA
GG
23.28 3.6 23.32 3.76 22.88 3.17
GA
23.8 3.66
Table 2. Relationship between genotype of the Gly482Ser (rs8192678) SNP and cardiometabolic risk factors stratified by median MET level. There were no significant
differences between any of the groups.
Risk Factor
Gly482Ser
(rs8192678)
GG (n=326)
mean METhrs/wk
SD
8.0 3.0
8 MET hrs/wk
(%)
52
> 8 MET hrs/wk
(%)
48
2 p-value
Model 1 - OR
(95% CI)
1.00
Model 2 - OR
(95% CI)
1.00
CONCLUSIONS
8 MET
hrs/wk
Table 3. Results of the square and logistic regression analyses of the Gly482Ser (rs8192678)
SNP. Model 1 is unadjusted, model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, BMI. *P=0.014 vs. GG.
AA
23.49 3.87
BMI (kg/m2)
Waist
Circumference (cm) 76.79 8.92 75.42 8.92 75.74 8.45 74.8 8.12
76.66 9.32 75.41 8.54
116.12
112.83
116.92
114.83
Systolic BP (mmHg)
11.68
114.7 11.09
10.15
11.11
116.54 11.82
10.88
Diastolic BP
(mmHg)
69.99 7.72 69.19 7.9 68.17 5.81 69.42 7.58 70.03 8.93 69.37 8.84
50.93
37.89
38.24
insulin (pmol/l)
57.47
43.4 25.59
22.91
41.4 32.9 45.08 25.69
20.62
glucose (mmol/l)
4.75 0.35
4.72 0.3
4.83 0.41 4.75 0.35
4.76 0.34
4.79 0.3
total Cholesterol
(mmol/l)
4.24 0.78 4.19 0.76 4.06 0.65 4.24 0.78
4.26 0.85
4.35 0.76
LDL (mmol/l)
2.28 0.66
2.2 0.53
2.11 0.52 2.24 0.68
2.28 0.65
2.3 0.66
HDL (mmol/l)
1.5 0.37
1.56 0.42
1.57 0.3
1.58 0.41
1.53 0.42
1.6 0.34
Triglycerides
(mmol/l)
1.03 0.46 0.94 0.39 0.83 0.25 0.93 0.41
1.03 0.73
1 0.44
REFERENCES
1. Finck, B.N. and D.P. Kelly, J Clin Invest, 2006. 116(3): p. 615-22.
2. St-Pierre, J., et al., J Biol Chem, 2003. 278(29): p. 26597-603.
3. Summermatter, S., et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2013. 110(21): p. 8738-43.
4. Summermatter, S., et al., Diabetes, 2013. 62(1): p. 85-95.
5. Maciejewska, A., et al. J Sports Sci, 2012. 30(1): p. 101-13.
6. Eynon, N., et al. Exp Physiol, 2009. 94(11): p. 1147-52.
7. Eynon, N., et al. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2010. 20(1): p. e145-50.
8. Vimaleswaran, K.S., et al. J Appl Physiol (1985), 2008. 105(4): p. 1352-8.
9. Mootha, V.K., et al. Nat Genet, 2003. 34(3): p. 267-73.
10.Jing, C., H. Xueyao, and J. LinongEndocrine, 2012. 42(2): p. 307-20.
11.Summermatter, S. and C. HandschinInt J Obes (Lond), 2012. 36(11): p. 1428-35.
12.Liang, H. and W.F. Ward Adv Physiol Educ, 2006. 30(4): p. 145-51.
13.Garca-Bailo B., et al. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Feb;95(2):352-61.
14.Ainsworth B.E., et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993;25:7180
Acknowledgements: