Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 63

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Hot-Wire Anemometry

Purpose:
to measure mean and fluctuating velocities in
fluid flows
http://www.dantecmt.com/

www.tsi.com/

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Principles of operation

Consider a thin wire mounted to supports and exposed to a


velocity U.
When a current is passed through wire, heat is generated (I2Rw).
In equilibrium, this must be balanced by heat loss (primarily
convective) to the surroundings.

If velocity changes,
convective heat
transfer coefficient
will change, wire
temperature will
change and
eventually reach a
new equilibrium.

C u rre n t I

S e n s o r d im e n s io n s :
le n g t h ~ 1 m m
d ia m e t e r ~ 5 m ic r o m e t e r

W ir e s u p p o r ts
( S t. S t. n e e d le s )

V e lo c ity U
S e n s o r ( th in w ir e )

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Governing equation I

Governing Equation:

dE
W H
dt

E = thermal energy stored in wire


E = CwTs
Cw = heat capacity of wire
W = power generated by Joule heating
W = I2 Rw
recall Rw = Rw(Tw)
H = heat transferred to surroundings

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Governing equation II

Heat transferred to surroundings

( convection to fluid
+ conduction to supports
+ radiation to surroundings)

Convection

Conduction

f(Tw , lw , kw, Tsupports)

Radiation

f(Tw4 - Tf4)

Qc = Nu A (Tw -Ta)
Nu = h d/kf = f (Re, Pr, M, Gr, ),
Re = U/

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Simplified static analysis I

For equilibrium conditions the heat storage is zero:


dE
O W H
dt

and the Joule heating W equals the convective heat transfer H

Assumptions

Radiation losses small


Conduction to wire supports small
Tw uniform over length of sensor
Velocity impinges normally on wire, and is uniform over its entire
length, and also small compared to sonic speed.
Fluid temperature and density constant

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Simplified static analysis II


Static heat transfer:
W =H
h
A
d
kf
Nu

=
=
=
=
=

I Rw = hA(Tw -Ta)
2

I2Rw = Nukf/dA(Tw -Ta)

film coefficient of heat transfer


heat transfer area
wire diameter
heat conductivity of fluid
dimensionless heat transfer coefficient

Forced convection regime, i.e. Re >Gr1/3 (0.02 in air) and Re<140

Nu = A1 + B1 Ren = A2+ B2 Un
I2Rw2 = E2 = (Tw -Ta)(A + B Un)

Kings law

The voltage drop is used as a measure of velocity.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Hot-wire static transfer function

Velocity sensitivity (Kings law coeff. A = 1.51, B = 0.811, n = 0.43)

5
dU/dE/U volts^-1

2,4

E volts

2,2
2
1,8

1,6
5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

U m /s

Output voltage as fct. of velocity

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

U m /s

Voltage derivative as fct. of velocity

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Directional response I
Probe coordinate system
y

Uy

Uz
Ux

Velocity vector U is decomposed into normal Ux, tangential


Uy and binormal Uz components.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Directional response II

Finite wire (l/d~200) response includes yaw and pitch sensitivity:


U2eff(a) = U2(cos2a + k2sin2a)

=0

U2eff( ) = U2(cos2 +h2sin2 )

=0

where:
k , h = yaw and pitch factors

, = angle between wire normal/wire-prong plane,


respectively, and velocity vector

General response in 3D flows:


U2eff = Ux2 + k2Uy2 + h2Uz2
Ueff is the effective cooling velocity sensed by the wire and deducted
from the calibration expression, while U is the velocity component
normal to the wire

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Directional response III

Typical directional response for hot-wire probe

(From DISA 1971)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Directional response IV

Yaw and pitch factors k1 and k2 (or k and h) depend on


velocity and flow angle

(From Joergensen 1971)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Probe types I

Miniature Wire Probes


Platinum-plated tungsten,
5 m diameter, 1.2 mm length

Gold-Plated Probes
3 mm total wire length,
1.25 mm active sensor
copper ends, gold-plated
Advantages:
- accurately defined sensing length
- reduced heat dissipation by the prongs
- more uniform temperature distribution
along wire
- less probe interference to the flow field

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Probe types II

For optimal frequency response, the probe should have as small a


thermal inertia as possible.

Important considerations:
Wire length should be as short as possible (spatial resolution;
want probe length << eddy size)
Aspect ratio (l/d) should be high (to minimise effects of end losses)
Wire should resist oxidation until high temperatures (want to
operate wire at high T to get good sensitivity, high signal to noise
ratio)
Temperature coefficient of resistance should be high (for high
sensitivity, signal to noise ratio and frequency response)
Wires of less than 5 m diameter cannot be drawn with reliable
diameters

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Probe types III

Film Probes
Thin metal film (nickel) deposited on quartz
body. Thin quartz layer protects metal film
against corrosion, wear, physical damage,
electrical action

Fiber-Film Probes
Hybrid - film deposited on a thin
wire-like quartz rod (fiber) split fiber-film
probes.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Probe types IV

X-probes for 2D flows


2 sensors perpendicular to each other.
Measures within 45o.

Split-fiber probes for 2D flows


2 film sensors opposite each other on a quartz
cylinder. Measures within 90o.

Tri-axial probes for 3D flows


3 sensors in an orthogonal system. Measures
within 70o cone.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Hints to select the right probe

Use wire probes whenever possible


relatively inexpensive
better frequency response
can be repaired

Use film probes for rough environments

more rugged
worse frequency response
cannot be repaired
electrically insulated
protected against mechanical and
chemical action

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Modes of anemometer operation

Constant Current (CCA)


Constant Temperature (CTA)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Constant current anemometer CCA

Principle:
Current through
sensor is kept
constant

Advantages:
- High frequency
response

Disadvantages:
- Difficult to use
- Output decreases with velocity
- Risk of probe burnout

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Constant Temperature Anemometer CTA I

Principle:
Sensor resistance
is kept constant by
servo amplifier

Advantages:
- Easy to use
- High frequency
response
- Low noise
- Accepted standard

Disadvantages:
- More complex circuit

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Constant temperature anemometer CTA II


3-channel StreamLine with
Tri-axial wire probe 55P91

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Modes of operation, CTA I

Wire resistance can be


written as:

Rw = Ro(1+
Rw = wire hot resistance
Ro = wire resistance at To
=
temp.coeff. of resistance
Tw = wire temperature
To = reference temperature

Define: OVERHEAT RATIO as:

a = (Rw-Ro)/Ro =

Set DECADE overheat resistor as: RD = (1+a)Rw

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Modes of operation, CTA II

The voltage across wire is given by:

E2 = I2Rw2 = Rw(Rw - Ra)(A1 + B1Un)


or as Rw is kept constant by the servoloop:

Note following comments


to CTA and to CCA:
- Response is non-linear:
- CCA output decreases
- CTA output increases
- Sensitivity decreases
with increasing U

2,4
2,2

E v o lts

E2 = A + BUn

1,8
1,6
5

10

15

20

25

30

35

U m /s

CTA output as fct. of U

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

40

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic response, CCA I


Hot-wire Probes:

For analysis of wire dynamic response, governing equation includes


the term due to thermal energy storage within the wire:

W = H + dE/dt
The equation then becomes a differential equation:

I2Rw = (Rw-Ra)(A+BUn) + Cw(dTw/dt)


or expressing Tw in terms of Rw:

I2Rw = (Rw-Ra)(A+BUn) + Cw/


Cw = heat capacity of the wire
= temperature coeff. of resistance of the wire

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic response, CCA II


Hot-wire Probes:
The first-order differential equation is characterised by a single time
constant :

= Cw/( n)

The normalised transfer function can be expressed as:

Hwire(f) = 1/(1+jf/fcp)
Where fcp is the frequency at which the amplitude damping is 3dB
(50% amplitude reduction) and the phase lag is 45o.
Frequency limit can be calculated from the time constant:

fcp = 1/2

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic response, CCA III


Hot-wire Probes:
Frequency response of film-probes is mainly determined by the
thermal properties of the backing material (substrate).
The time constant for film-probes becomes:

= (R/R0)2F2 sCsks/(A+BUn)2

= substrate density
Cs = substrate heat capacity
ks = substrate heat conductivity

and the normalised transfer function becomes:

Hfilm(f) = 1/(1+(jf/fcp)0.5)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic response, CCA IV


V e lo c it y
A m p litu d e r e s p o n s e a n d p h a s e la g
2

6 d B /o c ta v e

3 dB
30

T im e
R e s is t a n c e
R

0 .6 3 (R -R )
1

U p p e r f r e q u e n c y lim it f =

F re q u e n c y

T im e

Dynamic characteristic may be described by the response to


- Step change in velocity

or

- Sinusoidal velocity variation

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic response, CCA V

The hot-wire response characteristic is specified by:

(From P.E. Nielsen


and C.G. Rasmussen,
1966)

For a 5 m wire probe in CCA mode ~ 0.005s, typically.


(Frequency response can be improved by compensation circuit)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic response, CTA I

CTA keeps the wire at constant


temperature, hence the effect of
thermal inertia is greatly reduced:
Time constant is reduced to

CTA = CCA/(2aSRw)
where
a = overheat ratio
S = amplifier gain
Rw = wire hot resistance

Frequency limit:
fc defined as -3dB amplitude
damping

(From Blackwelder 1981)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic response, CTA II

Typical frequency response of 5 mm wire probe (Amplitude


damping and Phase lag):

(From Dantec MT)

Phase lag is reduced by frequency dependent gain (-1.2 dB/octave)


Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Velocity calibration (Static cal.)

Despite extensive work, no


universal expression to describe
heat transfer from hot wires and
films exist.

For all actual measurements,


direct calibration of the
anemometer is necessary.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Velocity calibration (Static cal.) II

Calibration in gases (example low turbulent free jet):


Velocity is determined from
isentropic expansion:

Po/P = (1+( 2)
a0 = ( 0 )0.5
a = ao/(1+( 2)0.5
U = Ma

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Velocity calibration (Static cal.) III

Film probes in water


- Using a free jet of liquid
issuing from the bottom of
a container
- Towing the probe at a
known velocity in still
liquid
- Using a submerged jet

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Typical calibration curve

Wire probe calibration with curve fit errors


E 1 v.U

E rro r (% )

2 .3 4 0

0 .5 0 0

2 .2 1 8

0 .3 0 0

2 .0 9 6

0 .1 0 0

E 1 (v )

E rro r (% )

1 .9 7 5

-0 .1 0 0

1 .8 5 3

-0 .3 0 0

1 .7 3 1

4 .0 7 6

1 1 .1 2

1 8 .1 7

2 5 .2 2

3 2 .2 7

3 9 .3 2

-0 .5 0 0

4 .0 7 6

1 1 .1 2

U v e lo c ity

1 8 .1 7

2 5 .2 2

3 2 .2 7

U v e lo c ity

(Obtained with Dantec 90H01/02)Calibrator)

Curve fit (velocity U as function of output voltage E):

U = C 0 + C 1 E + C 2 E 2 + C 3E 3 + C 4 E 4

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

3 9 .3 2

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic calibration/tuning I

Direct method
Need a flow in which sinusoidal velocity variations of known
amplitude are superimposed on a constant mean velocity
- Microwave simulation of turbulence (<500 Hz)
- Sound field simulation of turbulence (>500 Hz)
- Vibrating the probe in a laminar flow (<1000Hz)
All methods are difficult and are restricted to low frequencies.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic calibration/tuning II

Indirect method, SINUS TEST

10

10

A m p litu d e ( m V r m s )

A m p litu d e ( m V r m s )

Subject the sensor to an electric sine wave which simulates an


instantaneous change in velocity and analyse the amplitude
response.

-3 d B

10

10

10

-3 d B

10

1
10

10

10

10

10

F re q u e n c y (H z )

Typical Wire probe response

10

10

10

10

10

10

F re q u e n c y (H z )

Typical Fiber probe response

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

10

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic calibration/tuning III

Indirect method SQUARE


WAVE TEST
Subject the sensor to an
electric sine wave which
simulates an instantaneous
change in velocity and
analyse the shape of the
anemometer output

f =
c

0 .9 7 h

1
1 .3

0 .1 5 h
(From Bruun 1995)

For a wire probe (1-order probe response):


Frequency limit (- 3dB damping):

fc = 1/1.3

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Dynamic calibration
Conclusion:

Indirect methods are the only ones applicable in practice.


Sinus test necessary for determination of frequency limit for fiber
and film probes.

Square wave test determines frequency limits for wire probes.


Time taken by the anemometer to rebalance itself is used as a
measure of its frequency response.

Square wave test is primarily used for checking dynamic stability


of CTA at high velocities.

Indirect methods cannot simulate effect of thermal boundary

layers around sensor (which reduces the frequency response).

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Disturbing effects (problem sources)

Anemometer system makes use of heat transfer from the probe


Qc = Nu A (Tw -Ta)
Nu = h d/kf = f (Re, Pr, M, Gr,

Anything which changes this heat transfer (other than the flow
variable being measured) is a PROBLEM SOURCE!

Unsystematic effects (contamination, air bubbles in water, probe


vibrations, etc.)

Systematic effects (ambient temperature changes, solid wall


proximity, eddy shedding from cylindrical sensors etc.)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem sources
Probe contamination I

Most common sources:


-

dust particles
dirt
oil vapours
chemicals

Effects:
- Change flow sensitivity of sensor
(DC drift of calibration curve)
- Reduce frequency response

Cure:
- Clean the sensor
- Recalibrate

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Probe contamination II
Drift due to particle
contamination in air
5 m Wire, 70 m Fiber and
1.2 mm SteelClad Probes

20
(Um -Uact)/Uact*100%

10
0

w ire
fiber

-10

steel-clad
-20
0

10

20

30

40

50
Poly. (steelclad)
Poly. (fiber)

U (m /s)

(From Jorgensen, 1977)

Wire and fiber exposed to unfiltered air at 40 m/s in 40 hours


Steel Clad probe exposed to outdoor conditions 3 months during
winter conditions

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Probe contamination IV

Low Velocity
- slight effect of dirt on heat transfer
- heat transfer may even increase!
- effect of increased surface vs. insulating effect

High Velocity
- more contact with particles
- bigger problem in laminar flow
- turbulent flow has cleaning effect

Influence of dirt INCREASES as wire diameter DECREASES


Deposition of chemicals INCREASES as wire temperature
INCREASES

* FILTER THE FLOW, CLEAN SENSOR AND RECALIBRATE!


Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Probe contamination III
Drift due to particle contamination in water
Output voltage decreases with increasing dirt deposit

10
% voltage reduction

theory
1

fiber
w edge

0,1
0,001

0,01

0,1

Dirt thicknes versus sensor


diam eter, e/D
(From Morrow and Kline 1971)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Bubbles in Liquids I

Drift due to bubbles in water

(From C.G.Rasmussen 1967)

In liquids, dissolved gases form bubbles on sensor, resulting in:


- reduced heat transfer
- downward calibration drift

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Bubbles in Liquids II
e

Effect of bubbling on
portion of typical
calibration curve

Bubble size depends on


- surface tension
- overheat ratio
- velocity

Precautions
- Use low overheat!
- Let liquid stand before use!

155

175

1 9 5 c m /s e c
(From C.G.Rasmussen 1967)

- Dont allow liquid to cascade in air!


- Clean sensor!

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources (solved)


Stability in Liquid Measurements

Fiber probe operated stable in water

(From Bruun 1996)

- De-ionised water (reduces algae growth)


- Filtration (better than 2 m)
- Keeping water temperature constant (within 0.1oC)
Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem sources
Eddy shedding I

Eddy shedding from cylindrical sensors

(From Eckelmann 1975)

Occurs at Re ~50

Select small sensor diameters/ Low pass filter the signal


Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Eddy shedding II

Vibrations from prongs and probe supports:


- Probe prongs may vibrate due to eddy shedding from them or
due induced vibrations from the surroundings via the probe
support.
- Prongs have natural frequencies from 8 to 20 kHz
Always use stiff and rigid probe mounts.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Temperature Variations I

Fluctuating fluid temperature


Heat transfer from the probe is proportional to the temperature
difference between fluid and sensor.

E2 = (Tw-Ta)(A + BUn)

As Ta varies:
heat transfer changes
fluid properties change

Air measurements:
- limited effect at high overheat ratio
- changes in fluid properties are small
Liquid measurements effected more, because of:
lower overheats
stronger effects of T change on fluid properties
Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Temperature Variations II
Anemometer output depends on both velocity and
temperature

Hot-wire calibrations at diff. temperatures

-1,5
T=20

-1,7

T=25

-1,9

T=30

-2,1

T=35

-2,3

T=40

-2,5

Tdiff=10 C

-2,7
5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

10

20

30

40

When ambient temperature increases the velocity is measured too


low, if not corrected for.
Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

(From Joergensen and Morot1998)

2,4
2,3
2,2
2,1
2,0
1,9
1,8
1,7
1,6
1,5

Relative velocity error for 1C temp. increase

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Temperature Variations III
Film probe calibrated at different temperatures

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Problem Sources
Temperature Variations IV

To deal with temperature variations:

Keep the wire temperature fixed (no overheat adjustment),


measure the temperature along and correct anemometer voltage
prior to conversion

Keep the overheat constant either manually, or automatically


using a second compensating sensor.

Calibrate over the range of expected temperature and monitor


simultaneously velocity and temperature fluctuations.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Measurements in 2D Flows I
X-ARRAY PROBES (measures within 45o with respect to probe axis):

Velocity decomposition into the (U,V) probe coordinate system

U = U1cos1 + U2cos2
U = U1cos1 + U2cos2
V = U1sin1 - U2sin2
V = U1sin1 - U2sin2

where U1 and2 U2 in2 wire coordinate


system
are found by solving:
2
2
2
2
Ucal12 (1+k12 )(cos(90 - 1))2 = k12 U12 + U22
Ucal1 (1+k1 )(cos(90 - 1)) = k1 U1 + U2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Ucal22 (1+k22 )(cos(90 - 2))2 = U12 + k22 U22
Ucal2 (1+k2 )(cos(90 - 2)) = U1 + k2 U2

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Measurements in 2D Flows II

Directional calibration provides yaw coefficients k1 and k2

U c 1 ,U c 2 v s . A n g le

K 1 ,K 2 v s . A n g le

3 4 .6 8

3 .0 0 0

2 9 .1 4

0 .6 0 0

2 3 .5 9

0 .2 0 0

U c 1 ,U c 2

K 1 ,K 2

1 8 .0 4

-0 .2 0 0

1 2 .4 9

-0 .6 0 0

6 .9 4 5
- 4 0 .0 0

-2 4 .0 0

-8 .0 0 0

8 .0 0 0

A n g le ( d e g )

2 4 .0 0

4 0 .0 0

-1 .0 0 0
-4 0 .0 0

-2 4 .0 0

-8 .0 0 0

8 .0 0 0

2 4 .0 0

4 0 .0 0

A n g le ( d e g )

(Obtained with Dantec 55P51 X-probe and 55H01/H02 Calibrator)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Measurements in 3D Flows I
TRIAXIAL PROBES (measures within 70o cone around probe axis):

z
3
35

55

35

x
P ro b e s te m

45

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Measurements in 3D Flows II

Velocity decomposition into the (U,V,W) probe coordinate system


U = U1cos54.74 + U2cos54.74 + U3cos54.74
V = -U1cos45 - U2cos135 + U3cos90
W = -U1cos114.09 - U2cos114.09 - U3cos35.26

where U1 , U2 and U3 in wire coordinate system are found by solving:


2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
U1cal (1+k1 +h1 ) cos 35.264= k1 U1 + U2 + h1 U3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
U2cal (1+k2 +h2 )cos 35.264 = h2 U1 + k2 U2 + U3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
U3cal (1+k3 +h3 )cos 35.264 = U1 + h3 U2 + k3 U3

left hand sides are effective cooling velocities. Yaw and pitch
coefficients are determined by directional calibration.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Measurements in 3D Flows III


U, V and W measured by Triaxial probe, when rotated around
its axis. Inclination between flow and probe axis is 20 o.
5
Umeas

Vmeas

Wmeas

Res,meas

Uact

Vact

Meas. - Act. vel., m /s

Velocity component, m /s

Wact

-1

0,15
0,10
0,05

Up-Uact

Res,act

-2
0

30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360


Roll angle.

0,00

Vp-Vact

-0,05

Wp-Wact

-0,10
-0,15
0

60

120

180

240

300

360

Roll angle

(Obtained with Dantec Tri-axial probe 55P91 and 55H01/02 Calibrator)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Measurement at Varying Temperature


Temperature Correction I

Recommended temperature correction:


Keep sensor temperature constant, measure temperature and
correct voltages or calibration constants.

I) Output Voltage is corrected before conversion into velocity

Ecorr = ((Tw- Tref )/(Tw- Tacq))

0.5

Eacq.

- This gives under-compensation of approx. 0.4%/C in velocity.


Improved correction:

Ecorr = ((Tw- Tref)/(Tw- Tacq))

0.5(1m)

Eacq.

Selecting proper m (m= 0.2 typically for wire probe at a = 0.8) improves
compensation to better than 0.05%/C.

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Measurement at Varying Temperature


Temperature Correction II

Temperature correction in liquids may require correction


of power law constants A and B:
Acorr = (((Tw-To)/(Tw-Tacq))

(1m)

0.2

(kf0/kf1)(Prf0/Prf1) A0

(1m)

Bcorr = ((Tw-To)/(Tw-Tacq))

0.33
n
(kf0/kf1)(Prf0/Prf1) ( f1/ f0)n(f0/f1) B0

In this case the voltage is not corrected

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Data acquisition I

Data acquisition, conversion and reduction:

Requires digital processing based on

Selection of proper A/D board


Signal conditioning
Proper sampling rate and number of samples

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Data acquisition II
A/D boards convert analogue signals into digital information (numbers)
They have following main characteristics:

Resolution:
- Min. 12 bit (~1-2 mV depending on range)

Sampling rate:
- Min. 100 kHz (allows 3D probes to be sampled with approx. 30 kHz
per sensor)

Simultaneous sampling:
- Recommended (if not sampled simultaneously there will be phase
lag between sensors of 2- and 3D probes)

External triggering:
Recommended (allows sampling to be started by external event)

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Data acquisition III


Signal Conditioning of anemometer output
E
A n e m o m e te r

O f fs e t

A m p lif ie r
G ( E ( t ) - E o ff)

E ( t ) - E o ff

E (1 )

t
t

(From Bruun 1995)

Increases the AC part of the anemometer output and improves


resolution:
EG(t) = G(E(t) - Eoff )

Allows filtering of anemometer


- Low pass filtering is recommended
- High pass filtering may cause phase distortion of the signal
Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

Data acquisition IV
Sample rate and number of samples

Time domain statistics (spectra) require sampling 2 times the


highest frequency in the flow

Amplitude domain statistics (moments) require uncorrelated


samples. Sampling interval min. 2 times integral time scale.

Number of samples shall be sufficient to provide stable


statistics (often several thousand samples are required)
Proper choice requires some knowledge about the flow
aforehand
It is recommended to try to make autocorrelation and power
spectra at first as basis for the choice

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

AAE 520 Experimental Aerodynamics

CTA Anemometry
Steps needed to get good measurements:

Get an idea of the flow (velocity range, dimensions, frequency)

Make a first rough verification of the assumptions about the flow

Perform the experiment

Select right probe and anemometer configuration


Select proper A/D board
Perform set-up (hardware set-up, velocity calibration, directional
calibration)
Define experiment (traverse, sampling frequency and number of
samples)
Reduce the data (moments, spectra, correlations)
Evaluate results
Recalibrate to make sure that the anemometer/probe has not drifted

Purdue University - School of Aeronautics and Astronautics

You might also like