Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning in Silence: Improvement of Library Service Through Lessening of Noise
Learning in Silence: Improvement of Library Service Through Lessening of Noise
Learning in Silence: Improvement of Library Service Through Lessening of Noise
Silence
Improvement of library
service through
lessening of noise
Part 1
Executive Summary
Libraries
partner
Goal
Observations
Interview
Survey
Library
standards
Part 2
Statement of the Problem
Inadequate policies
regarding noise
control.
Lack of discipline
among library users
inside the library.
Inadequate library
personnel.
Inadequate library
space.
Part 3
Book
collect
ion
Long
tables
Single
tables
Walls
Libraria
n
workin
g area
Entran
ce/
Exit
Part 5
Recommendation and Benefits
Prohibition of
unruly
behavior
Positive
culture
formation
Provision of appropriate
materials inside the main library.
Appropriate
materials
inside the
main library
Eliminated
factors that
contribute to
noise
Quiet
environment
conducive for
learning
Better quality
of services
Adequate
floor area
n of quiet
study area
from
discussion
area
Better
quality of
service
Efficient
learning
Higher
level of
accreditati
on
Achieveme
nt of
institution
al goals
Clientele
satisfactio
n
Objective
s
Review of
library
policies
and
guideline
s
Activity
a. Periodic review of
the policies and
guidelines.
b. Creation of a
punishment system
to noise makers
c. Periodic orientation
regarding library
policies and
guidelines to all
library users
Provision a. Replacing long tables
of
with single tables will
appropria
reduce unnecessary
te
conversations among
materials
library users.
inside
b. Transferring long tables
the main
to a discussion area
library
c. Put rubber padding on
University June
library
2012
departme
nt
University
library
departme
nt
June
2012
1.6 Million
Objective
s
Activity
June
2013
1.32
Million per
year
June
2014
50 Million
University
library
departme
nt
Objective
s
Activity
Responsib
le
Targe Estimate
t
d
Budget
University June
library
2014
departme
nt
1 Million
Respondent
A
Respondent B
Interview