Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 26

Calibration System

Project
Prepared by: Socorro Cruz
Approved by: Fermin Del Rio

Term 93th
March 23, 2015

Agenda

Objective
Current Status in Apr 2014
Magnitude Analysis
Schedule
History of annual calibration service
Supplier Performance
Summary Suppliers Evaluation
In house calibration project
Opportunities
Database

P 2/22

Objective

To achieve savings in cost calibration service.


Implementing internal calibrations according to
ISO 17025.
Be prepared for automotive industry
Carry out measurements and calibrations with
known statistical methods and tools for
equipment reliability

P 3/22

Master List March31, 2014


According to Master List Equipment =570

Equipment not shown when inventories were taken / Lack of knowledge, if location of equipment in

B
Disposal of equipment was not registered

/ There is no person as assigned to equipment


P 4/22
responsibilities

Current Status May 2014


Inventory was taken to analyze what are the magnitudes at SMK, comparing
data base with the equipment of all areas (March-May,2014)

P 5/22

Magnitude Analysis
Determine what is the magnitude for every equipment

583 Equipments

According to analysis, the project will be held in electrical magnitude


P 6/22

Missing Equipment in May, 2014

P 7/22

Current Status April 2014


Findings

Certificate of calibration not accredited.


One supplier in calibration services.
Procedures not according to ISO 17025 General Requirements for
the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.
Formats and methods without specs and uncertainties.
There is no register in disposal equipment and new purchase.

Accreditation

Accreditation means
that an accrediting
entity assessed the
technical competence
and qualified personnel.
P 8/22

Electrical Magnitude
According to analysis, the project will be held in electrical magnitude
Tasks
Procedures according ISO 17025.
Formats, TUR, TAR, methods ISO 17025
Evaluation of equipment specs in final area
Looking for suppliers to provide an electrical standard
In regarding to our Devices Under Test, Performance, Evaluation of specs in
electrical in order to purchase a standard

ELECTRICAL MAGNITUDE

Calibration in
current DC

Calibration in
voltage DC

Generators
Meters
Generators
Search standard to calibrated
above equipment,
considering
Test Accuracy
Ratio 3:1

P 9/22

Schedule

Due to mis-understandig, I thought somebody else will do internal calibration and data
entry, but at the end I end up doing it.
P 10/22

History of annual calibration services

Term

90

2011

91

2012

92

2013

93

2014

According to PORs in the system. It will be verify term 60 (Qty Eq)

P 11/22

Data of Previous graphic

P 12/22

Summary Suppliers Evaluation


Last year visited calibration laboratories, it were evaluated and call them to
negotiated prices in Calibration services, They were traded certain
calibration points.

According to Evaluation Suppliers, We changed calibration


laboratory agreeing price for two years
P 13/22

Summary Suppliers Evaluation


Phone calls to calibration labs or reached by email.

P 14/22

Summary Suppliers Evaluation


Local Laboratories: Techmaster, Microprecision, CIDESI, Techmaster, Test Solutions

Lead Time
Cost (Calibration Points)
Accreditation (Scope)
Facilities
Customer Service

Changed Foreign Laboratory


Calibration to a National (Optical
Research Center).
Reduce cost
Lead time ( 8 weeks to 2 weeks)

P 15/22

Evaluation & Negotiation for external


calibration services
$ 33,515.90
$ 20,798.02

Agreeing Cost of calibration services for two years and all services
with accreditation.
Weekend services to not affect production.
No extra charge in emergency services.
No extra charge for minimum amount service.

P 16/22

Evaluation & Negotiation for external


calibration services

$ 33,515.90
$ 20,798.02

P 17/22

Purchase
Search for new suppliers
Increasing current directory supplier.
Negotiation prices in purchase.
Support other areas in purchase and suggest supplier and equipment.
Help with problems in production area suggest a kind of multimeter.
Request to new suppliers free technical courses to meet new face of test.
As plus free Courses Back to Basic RF, The beginning of Measurement, Technologies
& Applications with verniers

P 18/22

In house Calibration Project


According to magnitude analysis at the beginning, it will be make an
investment of electrical standard for calibration of powers
suppliers and multimeter.

We will not pay for these equipment in calibration service this year
INVESTMENT
EQUIPMENT
Source Meter

MANUFACTURER
Keithley

MODEL
2450

$4,860.00

Source Meter Unit


ANNUAL CALIBRATION SERVICE
EQUIPMENT

MANUFACTURER

MODEL

Power Supply

Agilent

1550

Multimeter

Steren

MUL-600

QTY

COST PER UNIT

TOTAL COST

92

$35.00

3,220.00

138

$25.00

3,450.00

6,670.00

ROI
PERCENTAGE ROI

YEAR ROI

137 %

0.72

Power Supply Multimeters

QC METROLOGA

P 19/22

In house Calibration Project


Formats to take
Measurements, Uncertainty,
Internal Calibration Reports,
Standard Data.

Standard
evaluation (all
electrical
equipment
specifications)

Calculation of
estimation
uncertainty

Procedures
(Current DC &
Voltage DC)
Training

QC METROLOGA

P 20/22

Design of internal calibration report with requirement of


ISO 17025

QC METROLOGA

P 21/22

Internal & External Calibration

P 22/22

Opportunities in calibration area

There are magnitudes dimensional & Mass to migrated in internal calibration project.

Implementing metrological culture by internal trainings, this way SMK save money to avoid external training in metrology topics.

To trained staff and acquire knowledge for better decision when they purchase equipment.

Improve measurement process in areas: Design, NPD, IQC, auditors, etc.

Improve a current data base.

QC METROLOGA

P 23/22

Propose new database

Benefits

Control Equipment (Add new one, moves in departments, Disposa1, etc).


Automatic notification in due calibration.
Improve the management of equipment.
Records automatically updated
Automated Reports
Access to all users
To making labels

P 24/22

Propose training

Benefits

Better decisions to purchase equipment


To meet specs and accuracy
Improve measurement methods
Staff trained, Staff productive
P 25/22

Conclusions

2014

Saving
52%

QC METROLOGA

P 26/22

You might also like