Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 46

Chapter 1:

Auditing, Assurance, and


Internal Control

Hall & Singleton, 2e

AUDITING
Auditing is a systematic process of
objectively obtaining and evaluating
evidence regarding assertions about
economic actions and events to ascertain
the degree of correspondence between
those assertions and establishing criteria
and communicating the results to
interested users.

INTERNAL AUDITS
Internal auditing: independent appraisal function
established within an organization to examine
and evaluate its activities as a service to the
organization

Financial Audits
Operational Audits
Compliance Audits
Fraud Audits
IT Audits
CIA
IIA

IT AUDITS
IT audits: provide audit services where
processes or data, or both, are embedded in
technologies.
Subject to ethics, guidelines, and standards of the
profession (if certified)
CISA
Most closely associated with ISACA
Joint with internal, external, and fraud audits
Scope of IT audit coverage is increasing
Characterized by CAATTs
IT governance as part of corporate governance

FRAUD AUDITS
Fraud audits: provide investigation services
where anomalies are suspected, to develop
evidence to support or deny fraudulent
activities.
Auditor is more like a detective
No materiality
Goal is conviction, if sufficient evidence of fraud
exists
CFE
ACFE

EXTERNAL AUDITS
External auditing: Objective is that in all material
respects, financial statements are a fair
representation of organizations transactions
and account balances.
SECs role
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
FASB - PCAOB
CPA
AICPA

EXTERNAL vs. INTERNAL


External auditing:

Independent auditor (CPA)


Independence defined by SEC/S-OX/AICPA
Required by SEC for publicly-traded companies
Referred to as a financial audit
Represents interests of outsiders, the public (e.g.,
stockholders)
Standards, guidance, certification governed by AICPA, FASB,
PCAOB; delegated by SEC who has final authority

Internal auditing:

Auditor (often a CIA or CISA)


Is an employee of organization imposing independence on self
Optional per management requirements
Broader services than financial audit; (e.g., operational audits)
Represent interests of the organization
Standards, guidance, certification governed by IIA and ISACA

FINANCIAL AUDITS
An independent attestation performed by an expert (i.e.,
an auditor, a CPA) who expresses an opinion regarding
the presentation of financial statements
Key concept: Independence
{Should be} Similar to a trial by judge
Culmination of systematic process involving:
Familiarization with the organizations business
Evaluating and testing internal controls
Assessing the reliability of financial data

Product is formal written report that expresses an


opinion about the reliability of the assertions in financial
statements; in conformity with GAAP

ATTEST definition
Written assertions
Practitioners written report
Formal establishment of measurement criteria or their
description
Limited to:
Examination
Review
Application of agreed-upon procedures

ATTEST vs. ASSURANCE


ASSURANCE
Professional services that are designed to improve
the quality of information, both financial and nonfinancial, used by decision-makers

IT Audit Groups in Big Four


IT Risk Management
I.S. Risk Management
Operational Systems Risk Management
Technology & Security Risk Services
Typically a division of assurance services

AUDITING STANDARDS
Auditing standards
Set by AICPA
Authoritative
#1 = Ten Generally Accepted Auditing Standards
(GAAS)
Three categories:
General Standards
Standards of Field Work
Reporting Standards
# 2 = Statements on Auditing Standards (SASs)
SAS #1 issued by AICPA in 1972

AUDITS
Systematic process
Five primary management assertions, and
correlated audit objectives and procedures
[Table 1-1]
Existence or Occurrence
Completeness
Rights & Obligations
Valuation or Allocation
Presentation or Disclosure

AUDITS
Phases [Figure 1-3]
1. Planning
2. Obtaining evidence
Tests of Controls
Substantive Testing
CAATTs
Analytical procedures

3. Ascertaining reliability
MATERIALITY

4. Communicating results
Audit opinion

Audit Risk Formula


AUDIT RISK:
The probability that the auditor
will give an inappropriate opinion
on the financial statements: that
is, that the statements will contain
materials misstatement(s) which
the auditor fails to find

Audit Risk Formula


INHERENT RISK:
The probability that material
misstatements have occurred
Material vs. Immaterial

Includes economic conditions, etc.


Relative risk (e.g., cash)

Audit Risk Formula


CONTROL RISK:
The probability that the internal controls
will fail to detect material misstatements

Audit Risk Formula


DETECTION RISK:
The probability that the audit
procedures will fail to detect material
misstatements
Substantive procedures

Audit Risk Formula


AUDIT RISK MODEL:
AR = IR * CR * DR
example inventory with:
IR=40%, CR=60%, AR=5% (fixed)
.05 = .4 * .6 * DR
... then DR=4.8%
Why is AR = 5%?
What is detection risk?
Can CR realistically be 0?
Relationship between DR and substantive
procedures

Audit Risk Model


Relationship between tests of controls and
substantive tests
Illustrate higher reliability of the internal controls and
the Audit Risk Model
What happens if internal controls are more reliable than last
audit?
Last year: .05 = .4 * .6 * DR [DR = 4.8]
This year: .05 = .4 * .4 * DR [DR = 3.2]
The more reliable the internal controls, the lower the CR
probability; thus the lower the DR will be, and fewer
substantive tests are necessary.

Substantive tests are labor intensive

Role of Audit Committee


Selected from board of directors
Usually three members
Outsiders (S-OX now requires it)
Fiduciary responsibility to shareholders
Serve as independent check and balance
system
Interact with internal auditors
Hire, set fees, and interact with external auditors
Resolved conflicts of GAAP between external
auditors and management

What is an IT Audit?
most accounting transactions to be in
electronic form without any paper
documentation because electronic
storage is more efficient. These
technologies greatly change the nature of
audits, which have so long relied on paper
documents.

THE IT ENVIRONMENT
There has always been a need for an effective
internal control system.
The design and oversight of that system has
typically been the responsibility of accountants.
The I.T. Environment complicates the paper
systems of the past.
Concentration of data
Expanded access and linkages
Increase in malicious activities in systems vs. paper
Opportunity that can cause management fraud (i.e.,
override)

THE IT ENVIRONMENT
Audit planning
Tests of controls
Substantive tests
CAATTs

INTERNAL CONTROL
is policies, practices, procedures
designed to
safeguard assets
ensure accuracy and reliability
promote efficiency
measure compliance with policies

BRIEF HISTORY - SEC


SEC acts of 1933 and 1934
Ivar Kreugers Contribution to U.S.
Financial Reporting, Accounting Review,
Flesher & Flesher
All corporations that report to the SEC are
required to maintain a system of internal
control that is evaluated as part of the
annual external audit.

BRIEF HISTORY - Copyright


Federal Copyright Act 1976
1. Protects intellectual property in the U.S.
2. Has been amended numerous times since
3. Management is legally responsible for violations of
the organization
4. U.S. government has continually sought
international agreement on terms for protection of
intellectual property globally vs. nationally

BRIEF HISTORY - FCPA


Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977
1. Accounting provisions

FCPA requires SEC registrants to establish and maintain books,


records, and accounts.
It also requires establishment of internal accounting controls
sufficient to meet objectives.
1. Transactions are executed in accordance with managements
general or specific authorization.
2. Transactions are recorded as necessary to prepare financial
statements (i.e., GAAP), and to maintain accountability.
3. Access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management
authorization.
4. The recorded assets are compared with existing assets at
reasonable intervals.

2. Illegal foreign payments

BRIEF HISTORY - COSO


Committee on Sponsoring Organizations - 1992
1. AICPA, AAA, FEI, IMA, IIA
2. Developed a management perspective model
for internal controls over a number of years
3. Is widely adopted

BRIEF HISTORY S-OX


Sarbanes-Oxley Act - 2002
1. Section 404: Management Assessment of Internal
Control
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control structure and procedures.
Must certify by report on the effectiveness of internal control
each year, with other annual reports.

2. Section 302: Corporate Responsibility for Incident


Reports
Financial executives must disclose deficiencies in internal
control, and fraud (whether fraud is material or not).

Modifying Assumptions
1. Management responsibility
2. Reasonable assurance
no I.C.S. is perfect
benefits => costs
3. Methods of data processing
Objectives same regardless of DP method
Specific controls vary w/different
technologies

Modifying Assumptions
4. Limitations

Possibility of error
Possibility of circumvention
Management override
Changing conditions

EXPOSURES AND RISK


Exposure (definition)
Risks (definition)
Types of risk
Destruction of assets
Theft of assets
Corruption of information or the I.S.
Disruption of the I.S.

THE P-D-C MODEL


Preventive controls
Detective controls
Corrective controls
Which is most cost effective?
Which one tends to be proactive measures?
Can you give an example of each?

Predictive controls

SAS 78: Consideration of Internal Control in


a Financial Statement Audit

COSO (Treadway Commission)


The control environment
Risk assessment
Information & communication
Monitoring
Control activities

SAS 78
(#1:Control Environment -- elements)
Describe how each one could adversely
affect internal control.

The integrity and ethical values


Structure of the organization
Participation of audit committee
Managements philosophy and style
Procedures for delegating

SAS 78
(#1:Control Environment -- elements)
Managements methods of assessing
performance
External influences
Organizations policies and practices for
managing human resources

SAS 78
(#1:Control Environment -- techniques)
Describe possible activity or tool for each.
Assess the integrity of organizations
management
Conditions conducive to management fraud
Understand clients business and industry
Determine if board and audit committee are
actively involved
Study organization structure

SAS 78
(#2:Risk Assessment)
Changes in environment
Changes in personnel
Changes in I.S.
New ITs
Significant or rapid growth
New products or services (experience)
Organizational restructuring
Foreign markets
New accounting principles

SAS 78
(#3:Information & Communication-elements)
Initiate, identify, analyze, classify and record
economic transactions and events.

Identify and record all valid economic


transactions
Provide timely, detailed information
Accurately measure financial values
Accurately record transactions

SAS 78
(#3:Information & Communication-techniques)

Auditors obtain sufficient knowledge of


I.S.s to understand:
Classes of transactions that are material
Accounting records and accounts used
Processing steps:initiation to inclusion in
financial statements (illustrate)
Financial reporting process (including
disclosures)

SAS 78
(#4: Monitoring)
By separate procedures (e.g., tests of
controls)
By ongoing activities (Embedded Audit
Modules EAMs and Continuous Online
Auditing - COA)

SAS 78
(#5: Control Activities)

Physical Controls (1-3)


Transaction authorization
Example:
Sales only to authorized customer
Sales only if available credit limit

Segregation of duties
Examples of incompatible duties:
Authorization vs. processing [e.g., Sales vs. Auth. Cust.]
Custody vs. recordkeeping [e.g., custody of inventory vs.
DP of inventory]
Fraud requires collusion [e.g., separate various steps in
process]

Supervision
Serves as compensating control when lack of segregation
of duties exists by necessity

Physical Controls (4-6)


Accounting records (audit trails; examples)
Access controls
Direct (the assets)
Indirect (documents that control the assets)
Fraud
Disaster Recovery

Independent verification
Management can assess:
The performance of individuals
The integrity of the AIS
The integrity of the data in the records
Examples

IT Risks Model
Operations
Data management systems
New systems development
Systems maintenance
Electronic commerce (The Internet)
Computer applications

You might also like