Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Study Designs: Cross-Sectional Studies, Ecologic Studies (And Confidence Intervals)
Study Designs: Cross-Sectional Studies, Ecologic Studies (And Confidence Intervals)
Cross-sectional studies
Faster keyboarding - 1
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I
was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid,
aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy. It
dn'seot mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the
olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in
the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can
sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm.
Gary C. Ramseyer's First Internet Gallery of Statistics Jokes
http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/humorf.html (#162)
Faster keyboarding - 2
Most of my friends could read this with understanding
and rather quickly I might add. Then I had them read a
statistical bit of literature:
Miittluvraae asilyans sattes an idtenossiy ctuoonr epilsle
is the itternoiecsno of a panle pleralal to the xl-yapne and
the sruacfe of a btiiarave nmarol dbttiisruein.
Gary C. Ramseyer's First Internet Gallery of Statistics Jokes
http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/humorf.html (#162)
Cross-sectional studies
Today outline
Cross-sectional studies (and sampling)
Ecologic studies
Confidence intervals
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
Cross-sectional studies
Cross-sectional studies include surveys
People are studied at a point in time, without
follow-up.
Can combine a cross-sectional study with follow-up
to create a cohort study.
Can conduct repeated cross-sectional studies to
measure change in a population.
2/10/2009
Cross-sectional studies
Cross-sectional studies
Number of uninsured Americans rises to 50.7 million .
(USA Today, 9/17/2010; data from Census Bureau)
2/22/2011
Cross-sectional studies
10
Cross-sectional studies
Incidence information is not available from a typical
cross-sectional study
Sometimes can reconstruct incidence from historical
information
Example: the incidence proportion of quitting smoking,
called the quit ratio:
ex-smokers / ever-smokers
is calculated from survey data.
2/10/2009
Cross-sectional studies
11
Cross-sectional studies
12
Population census
A cross-sectional study of an entire
population
Provides the denominator data for
many purposes (e.g., estimation of
rates, assessing generalizability,
projecting from smaller studies)
A huge effort people can be difficult to
find and to count; may not want to
provide data
Some countries maintain accurate and
current registries of the entire country
2/22/2011
Cross-sectional studies
13
Cross-sectional studies
14
National surveys
Designed to be representative of the entire country
Modes: household interview, telephone, mail
Employ complex sampling designs to optimize
efficiency (tradeoff between information and cost)
Logistically challenging (answering machines, cellphones, . . .)
See presentation by Dr. Anjani Chandra at
www.minority.unc.edu/institute/2003/materials/slides/Chandra-20030522.ppt
2/22/2011
Cross-sectional studies
15
Cross-sectional studies
16
multistaged
Improves logistical feasibility and reduces costs
(though reduces precision)
1. Divide population into primary sampling units
(PSUs)
PSU = primary sampling unit: metropolitan statistical
area, county, group of adjacent counties
2/10/2009
Cross-sectional studies
17
multistaged
2. Select sample of census block groups (SSUs) within
each selected PSU
3. Map each selected census block group or examine
building permits
4. Select one cluster of 4-8 housing units dispersed
evenly throughout the block
NCHS draws a new representative sample for each
weeks interviews
2/10/2009
Cross-sectional studies
18
stratified
US divided into 1,900 PSUs
Largest 52 PSUs are self-representing
Rest of PSUs divided into 73 categories (strata),
based on socioeconomic and demographic variables
Sampling takes place separately within each category
(stratum)
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
19
7/30/2010
Cross-sectional studies
20
Weighted sampling
Hypothetical Unweighted Weighted
Age group Pop (1,000's) Sample
Sample
20-39 yrs
40-59 yrs
60-69 yrs
Total
3/6/2006
18,000
18,000
8,000
44,000
Cross-sectional studies
900
900
400
2,200
400
400
400
1,200
21
stratified
Also place census blocks into categories and
sample within each
Oversample some strata
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
22
Defined population
Studies, especially cross-sectional studies, are easiest to
interpret when they are based in a population that has some
existence apart from the study itself (defined population)
1. Political subdivision (city, county, state)
2. Institutional (HMO, employer, profession)
Probability sampling enables statistical generalizability to
the defined population
2/10/2009
Cross-sectional studies
23
2/22/2011
Cross-sectional studies
24
HIV seroprevalence
[Schoenbach VJ, Landis SE, Weber DJ, Mittal M, Koch GG, Levine PH. HIV
seroprevalence in sexually transmitted disease clients in a low-prevalence southern
state. Ann Epidemiol 1993;3:281-288]
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
25
Syphilis
(history/current)
Gonorrhea (history)
53
9.0
37
2.6
Anal intercourse
41
1.7
5.2
[Schoenbach VJ, Landis SE, Weber DJ, Mittal M, Koch GG, Levine PH. HIV
seroprevalence in sexually transmitted disease clients in a low-prevalence southern state.
Ann Epidemiol 1993;3:281-288]
10/14/2003
Cross-sectional studies
26
Interpretation
Measures prevalence if incidence is our real
interest, prevalence is often not a good surrogate
measure
Studies only survivors and stayers
May be difficult to determine whether a cause
came before an effect (exception: genetic
factors)
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
27
Other points
Can choose by exposure or overall
Can choose by disease may not be
distinguishable from a case-control study with
prevalent cases
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
28
Outline
Cross-sectional studies (and sampling)
Ecologic studies
Confidence intervals
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
29
Ecologic studies
Most study designs cross-sectional, casecontrol, cohort, intervention trials can be carried
out with individuals or with groups
Group-level studies which use routinely collected
data are easier and less costly
Group-level studies that involve interventions
may not be easier or less costly
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
30
Cross-sectional studies
31
Interpretation
Link between summary exposure variable and
individual-level outcome must be inferred
Inference from group to individual is not
always sound
2/22/2011
Cross-sectional studies
32
Source: Bongaarts J, et al. The relationship between male circumcision and HIV infection in African populations. AIDS 1989; 3(6): 373-7.
2/22/2011
Cross-sectional studies
33
Outline
Cross-sectional studies (and sampling)
Ecologic studies
Confidence intervals
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
34
Confidence intervals
Provide a plausible range for the quantity
being estimated
Width indicates the precision of an estimate
for a given level of confidence
Confidence intervals quantify only random
error from sampling variation, not systematic
error from nonresponse, study design, etc.
3/8/2006
Cross-sectional studies
35
Cross-sectional studies
36
10/12/2004
Cross-sectional studies
37
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
38
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
39
Cross-sectional studies
40
Cross-sectional studies
41
6/29/2002
Cross-sectional studies
42
2/22/2011
Cross-sectional studies
43
True value
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
44
Cross-sectional studies
45
Cross-sectional studies
46
Estimate
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
47
o
oo
oooo
oooooo
oooooooo
oooooooooo
o ooooooooooo o
ooooooooooooooo o o
Estimate
Cross-sectional studies
48
o
oo
oooo
oooooo
oooooooo
oooooooooo
o o ooooooooooo o
oooooooooooooooo o o
Estimate
Cross-sectional studies
49
Estimate
o
oo
oooo
oooooo
oooooooo
oooooooooo
o o ooooooooooo o
oo o ooooooooooooooo
95% of the distribution
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
50
Estimate
o
oo
oooo
oooooo
oooooooo
oooooooooo
o o ooooooooooo
oo o oooooooooooooo
95% of the distribution
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
51
Cross-sectional studies
52
o
o
o
o
ooo
o
o
oo oo oo
oo
oooo
o
o
oooooooooooo
ooo
oo
ooo
oo
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo
ooo
o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo o
oo
oo
oo
ooo
oo
oo
oo
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
ooo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
o
oooooooooooo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
ooo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o o oo o
ooooooo o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o o oo o oo
oo
o
o
o
o
o
oo
oo
o o o oo o o o o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
oo
o oo o o o o o o o o
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo
oo o o
ooooooooooooooo
o
95% confidence interval
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
53
Cross-sectional studies
54
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
55
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
56
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
57
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
58
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
59
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
60
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
61
etc.
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
62
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
63
O O
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
64
O O
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
65
The sample
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
66
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
67
Interval estimate
What are all the possible populations that
would be expected to yield this prevalence in
a sample of size 10?
6/29/2005
Cross-sectional studies
68
10/15/2001
Cross-sectional studies
69
3/8/2006
Cross-sectional studies
70
3/8/2006
Cross-sectional studies
71
3/8/2006
Cross-sectional studies
72
Cross-sectional studies
73
O OO OO OOOOO O OO
OO
O
O O O OO OO O O OO OO O
OO O OO O O O O
OO
O
O O O O O OO O OO O
O
OO OO O OO O OO O O O
O O OO OOO O OO O OO
O O O O OOO OO OOO O
3/8/2006
Cross-sectional studies
74
O OO OO O OOO O OO O OO
O
O O O OO OO O O OO OO O
OO O OO O O OO O
O
O
O O O O O OO O OO O
O
OO OO OO OO O OO O O O
O O OO O O O OO O OO
OO O OO O OOO OO OOO O
3/8/2006
Cross-sectional studies
75
Cross-sectional studies
76
Cross-sectional studies
77
78
79