Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Condylar fractures

Dr. Demerew

Classification Schemes

Condylar fractures:
General classification:
In order from most inferior to
superior
Subcondylar
Condylar neck
Intracapsular

Dr. Demerew

Condylar Process
Fractures

Incidence:
Represent 25-35% of
all mandible
fractures
Location:

14% intracapsular
(41% in children <10)
24% condylar neck
(38% in adults >50)
62% subcondylar
84% unilateral
16% bilateral
Dr. Demerew

Diagnostic findings of
Condylar
1.Evidence
of facial trauma, especially in
fractures

the area of the mandible and symphysis.


2.Localized pain and swelling in the region
of the TMJ.
3.Limitation in mouth opening.
4.Deviation, upon opening, towards the
involved side.
5. Posterior open bite on the contralateral
side.
Dr. Demerew

Cont.
6. Shift of occlusion towards the

ipsilateral side with possible cross bite.


7. Blood in the external auditory canal.
8. Pain on palpation over the fracture
site.
9. Lack of condylar movement upon
palpation

Dr. Demerew

Cont.

10. Difficulty in lateral excursions as well


as protrusion.
11. The occurrence of anterior open bite
with bilateral subcondylar fractures. This
is associated with posterior gagging of
the occlusion.
12. Persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak
through the ear is indicative of an
associated fracture of base of skull.
Dr. Demerew

Condylar Process
Fractures

Classifications:
Wassmund Scheme:
I- minimal displacement of head (10-45)
II- fracture with tearing of medial joint
capsule (45-90), bone still contacting
III- bone fragments not contacting, condylar
head outside of capsule medially and
anteriorly displaced
IV- head is anterior to the articular eminence
V- vertical or oblique fractures through
7
condylar head Dr. Demerew

Condylar Process
Fractures

Classifications:
Lindahl classification:
I- nondisplaced
II- simple angulation of displacement, no
overlap
III- displaced with medial overlap
IV- displaced with lateral overlap
V- displaced with anterior or posterior
overlap
VI- no contacts between segments

Dr. Demerew

Condylar Process
Fractures

Classifications:
MacLennan classification:
I- nondisplaced
II- deviation of fracture
III- displacement but condyle still in
fossa
IV- dislocation outside of glenoid fossa

Dr. Demerew

Condylar Process
Fractures

Goals of condylar fracture repair:


1) Pain-free mouth opening with
opening of 40mm or greater
2) Good mandibular motion of jaw in
all excursions
3) Restoration of pre injury occlusion
4) Stable TMJs
5) Good facial and jaw symmetry
Dr. Demerew

10

Condylar Process
Fractures

Growth alteration from condylar


fractures:
Estimated that 5-20% of all severe
mandibular asymmetry is from
condylar trauma
Believed to be from shortening of
the ramus or alterations in muscle
action leading to growth changes
Dr. Demerew

11

Condylar Process
Fractures

Treatment alternatives:
Non-surgical- diet, observation and
physical therapy
Closed reduction- utilizes a period of
IMF the physical therapy
Open reduction

Dr. Demerew

12

Condylar Process
Fractures

Closed reduction:
Indications:
Split condylar head
Intracapsular fracture
comminuted condyle

Treated with short course of IMF with


post-operative physical therapy

Dr. Demerew

13

Condylar Process
Fractures

Open reduction:
Zides absolute indications:
1) middle cranial fossa involvement with
disability
2) inability to achieve occlusion with
closed reduction
3) invasion of joint space by foreign
body

Dr. Demerew

14

Condylar Process
Fractures

Open reduction:
Zides relative indications:
1) bilateral condylar fractures where the
vertical facial height needs to be restored
2) associated injuries that dictate early or
immediate function
3) medical conditions that indicate open
procedures
4) delayed treatment with malalignment
of segments

Dr. Demerew

15

Malunion (Dysarthrosis or
Meta-arthrosis) and
Pseudoarthrosis

Dysarthrosis:Here morphological
change is seen in unreduced fracture
dislocation producing nonarticulating
deformed condyle.
The malunion results in disturbance in
anatomy as well as in function. Patient
will have pain and limitation of
movements of lower jaw.
Dr. Demerew

16

Meta-arthrosis:It is result of healed


fracture in malposition, but it produces
no symptoms. These are the type of
joints with altered anatomy, but
functionally acceptable (anatomically
altered, transformed, modified joints)
Pseudoarthrosis:False joint, very painful
during normal excursions.
Condylectomy may be required
Dr. Demerew

17

Condylar Process
Fractures

Open reduction
techniques:
Multiple
approaches and
fixation have
been developed
and used

Dr. Demerew

18

Condylar Process
Fractures

Studies have shown that closed


reduction techniques rarely produce
pain, limit function, or produce growth
disturbances
Open reductions techniques show an
early return to normal function, but are
technique sensitive, time extensive,
and can lead to facial nerve
dysfunction depending upon surgical
approach
Dr. Demerew

19

Complications

Due to dirty environment of oral


cavity, mandible fractures should be
on antibiotics to decrease infections,
especially with fractures in the
dento-alveolar portion.
Difficult to get a concensus of
infection rates due to wide range and
case report citings in the literature
Dr. Demerew

20

Complications

Malocclusion:
More difficult to manage with rigid
fixation
Most studies have shown that
malocclusion occur more frequently
with rigid fixation
May be due to plate malpositioning/iatrogenic
Low risk in pediatric fractures due
to growth and dentition reposition
Dr. Demerew

21

Complications

Malunion and nonunion:


Most nonunions occur from infections
of the fracture or teeth in the line of
fracture
Malunions are usually tolerated well by
the patient, most malunions of the
body, symphysis, or angle can result in
malocclusions. This is harder for the
patient to tolerate. More common with
improper use of fixation technique.
Dr. Demerew

22

You might also like