23 - Evolutionofpopulations Text

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 61

Chapter 23

The Evolution of Populations

PowerPoint Lectures for


Biology, Seventh Edition
Neil Campbell and Jane Reece

Lectures by Chris Romero


Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Overview: The Smallest Unit of Evolution


One common misconception about evolution is
that individual organisms evolve, in the
Darwinian sense, during their lifetimes
Natural selection acts on individuals, but
populations evolve

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Genetic variations in populations


Contribute to evolution

Figure 23.1
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Concept 23.1: Population genetics provides a


foundation for studying evolution
Microevolution
Is change in the genetic makeup of a
population from generation to generation

Figure 23.2
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

The Modern Synthesis


Population genetics
Is the study of how populations change
genetically over time
Reconciled Darwins and Mendels ideas

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

The modern synthesis


Integrates Mendelian genetics with the
Darwinian theory of evolution by natural
selection
Focuses on populations as units of evolution

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Gene Pools and Allele Frequencies


A population

MAP
AREA

CANADA

ALASKA

Is a localized group of individuals that are capable of


interbreeding and producing fertile offspring

Beaufort Sea

Porcupine
herd range

N
TE OR
RR TH
IT W E
O S
RI T
ES

Fortymile
herd range

ALASKA
YUKON

Fairbanks

Whitehorse

Figure 23.3
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

The gene pool


Is the total aggregate of genes in a population
at any one time
Consists of all gene loci in all individuals of the
population

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

The Hardy-Weinberg Theorem


The Hardy-Weinberg theorem
Describes a population that is not evolving
States that the frequencies of alleles and
genotypes in a populations gene pool remain
constant from generation to generation
provided that only Mendelian segregation and
recombination of alleles are at work

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Mendelian inheritance
Preserves genetic variation in a population
Generation
1
CWCW
CRCR
genotype
genotype
Plants mate

Generation
2
All CRCW
(all pink flowers)

50% CR
gametes

50% CW
gametes

Come together at random

Generation
3
25% CRCR

50% CRCW

50% CR
gametes

25% CWCW

50% CW
gametes

Come together at random

Generation
4
25% CRCR

Figure 23.4
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

50% CRCW

25% CWCW

Alleles segregate, and subsequent


generations also have three types
of flowers in the same proportions

Preservation of Allele Frequencies


In a given population where gametes contribute
to the next generation randomly, allele
frequencies will not change

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
Describes a population in which random
mating occurs
Describes a population where allele
frequencies do not change

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

A population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium


Gametes for each generation are drawn at random from
the gene pool of the previous generation:
80% CR (p = 0.8)

20% CW (q = 0.2)

Sperm
CR
(80%)

CW
(20%)

pq

CR
(80%)

p2
64%
CRCR
CW
(20%)

Eggs

p2

16%
CRCW

16%
CRCW

qp

4%
CWCW

q2
If the gametes come together at random, the genotype
frequencies of this generation are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium:
64% CRCR, 32% CRCW, and 4% CWCW

Gametes of the next generation:


16% CR from
64% CR from
+
CRCW homozygotes
CRCR homozygotes
4% CW from
CW CW homozygotes

16% CW from
CRCW heterozygotes

80% CR = 0.8 = p

20% CW = 0.2 = q

With random mating, these gametes will result in the same


mix of plants in the next generation:

Figure 23.5

64% CRCR, 32% CRCW and 4% CWCW plants

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

If p and q represent the relative frequencies of


the only two possible alleles in a population at
a particular locus, then
p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1
And p2 and q2 represent the frequencies of the
homozygous genotypes and 2pq represents
the frequency of the heterozygous genotype

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Conditions for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium


The Hardy-Weinberg theorem
Describes a hypothetical population

In real populations
Allele and genotype frequencies do change
over time

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

The five conditions for non-evolving


populations are rarely met in nature
Extremely large population size
No gene flow
No mutations
Random mating
No natural selection

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Population Genetics and Human Health


We can use the Hardy-Weinberg equation
To estimate the percentage of the human
population carrying the allele for an inherited
disease

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Concept 23.2: Mutation and sexual


recombination produce the variation that
makes evolution possible
Two processes, mutation and sexual
recombination
Produce the variation in gene pools that
contributes to differences among individuals

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Mutation
Mutations
Are changes in the nucleotide sequence of DNA

Cause new genes and alleles to arise

Figure 23.6
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Point Mutations
A point mutation
Is a change in one base in a gene
Can have a significant impact on phenotype
Is usually harmless, but may have an adaptive
impact

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Mutations That Alter Gene Number or Sequence


Chromosomal mutations that affect many loci
Are almost certain to be harmful
May be neutral and even beneficial

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Gene duplication
Duplicates chromosome segments

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Mutation Rates
Mutation rates
Tend to be low in animals and plants
Average about one mutation in every 100,000
genes per generation
Are more rapid in microorganisms

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Sexual Recombination
In sexually reproducing populations, sexual
recombination
Is far more important than mutation in
producing the genetic differences that make
adaptation possible

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Concept 23.3: Natural selection, genetic drift,


and gene flow can alter a populations genetic
composition
Three major factors alter allele frequencies and
bring about most evolutionary change
Natural selection
Genetic drift
Gene flow

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Natural Selection
Differential success in reproduction
Results in certain alleles being passed to the
next generation in greater proportions

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Genetic Drift
Statistically, the smaller a sample
The greater the chance of deviation from a
predicted result

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Genetic drift
Describes how allele frequencies can fluctuate
unpredictably from one generation to the next
Tends to reduce genetic variation
CWCW

CRCR

CRCR

Only 5 of
10 plants
leave
offspring

CRCW
CWCW

CRCR

CRCR

CRCW
CWCW

CRCR
CRCW

CRCW
CRCR

CWCW

CRCW
CRCR

CRCR

CRCW

Generation 1
p (frequency of CR) = 0.7
q (frequency of CW) = 0.3

CRCR

CRCR
CRCR

CRCR

CRCR

CRCR
CRCR

CRCR
CRCW

CRCW
Generation 2
p = 0.5
q = 0.5

Figure 23.7
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Only 2 of
10 plants
leave
offspring

CRCR

CRCR

Generation 3
p = 1.0
q = 0.0

The Bottleneck Effect


In the bottleneck effect
A sudden change in the environment may
drastically reduce the size of a population
The gene pool may no longer be reflective of
the original populations gene pool

(a) Shaking just a few marbles through the


narrow neck of a bottle is analogous to a
drastic reduction in the size of a population
after some environmental disaster. By chance,
blue marbles are over-represented in the new
population and gold marbles are absent.

Original
population

Figure 23.8 A
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Bottlenecking
event

Surviving
population

Understanding the bottleneck effect


Can increase understanding of how human
activity affects other species

(b) Similarly, bottlenecking a population


of organisms tends to reduce genetic
variation, as in these northern
elephant seals in California that were
once hunted nearly to extinction.

Figure 23.8 B

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

The Founder Effect


The founder effect
Occurs when a few individuals become
isolated from a larger population
Can affect allele frequencies in a population

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Gene Flow
Gene flow
Causes a population to gain or lose alleles
Results from the movement of fertile
individuals or gametes
Tends to reduce differences between
populations over time

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Concept 23.4: Natural selection is the primary


mechanism of adaptive evolution
Natural selection
Accumulates and maintains favorable
genotypes in a population

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Genetic Variation
Genetic variation
Occurs in individuals in populations of all
species
Is not always heritable

(a) Map butterflies that


emerge in spring:
orange and brown

(b) Map butterflies that


emerge in late summer:
black and white

Figure 23.9 A, B
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Variation Within a Population


Both discrete and quantitative characters
Contribute to variation within a population

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Discrete characters
Can be classified on an either-or basis

Quantitative characters
Vary along a continuum within a population

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Polymorphism
Phenotypic polymorphism
Describes a population in which two or more
distinct morphs for a character are each
represented in high enough frequencies to be
readily noticeable

Genetic polymorphisms
Are the heritable components of characters
that occur along a continuum in a population
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Measuring Genetic Variation


Population geneticists
Measure the number of polymorphisms in a
population by determining the amount of
heterozygosity at the gene level and the
molecular level

Average heterozygosity
Measures the average percent of loci that are
heterozygous in a population
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Variation Between Populations


Most species exhibit geographic variation
Differences between gene pools of separate
populations or population subgroups

Figure 23.10

2.4

3.14

5.18

8.11

9.12

10.16

13.17

2.19

3.8

4.16

9.10

11.12

13.17

15.18

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

7.15

19

XX

5.14

6.7
XX

Some examples of geographic variation occur


as a cline, which is a graded change in a trait
along a geographic axis
EXPERIMENT Researchers observed that the average size
of yarrow plants (Achillea) growing on the slopes of the Sierra
Nevada mountains gradually decreases with increasing
elevation. To eliminate the effect of environmental differences
at different elevations, researchers collected seeds
from various altitudes and planted them in a common
garden. They then measured the heights of the
resulting plants.

Mean height (cm)

Heights of yarrow plants grown in common garden

Atitude (m)

RESULTS The average plant sizes in the common


garden were inversely correlated with the altitudes at
which the seeds were collected, although the height
differences were less than in the plants natural
environments.

CONCLUSION The lesser but still measurable clinal variation


in yarrow plants grown at a common elevation demonstrates the
role of genetic as well as environmental differences.

Figure 23.11
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Sierra Nevada
Range

Great Basin
Plateau

Seed collection sites

A Closer Look at Natural Selection


From the range of variations available in a
population
Natural selection increases the frequencies of
certain genotypes, fitting organisms to their
environment over generations

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Evolutionary Fitness
The phrases struggle for existence and
survival of the fittest
Are commonly used to describe natural
selection
Can be misleading

Reproductive success
Is generally more subtle and depends on many
factors

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Fitness
Is the contribution an individual makes to the
gene pool of the next generation, relative to
the contributions of other individuals

Relative fitness
Is the contribution of a genotype to the next
generation as compared to the contributions of
alternative genotypes for the same locus

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Directional, Disruptive, and Stabilizing Selection


Selection
Favors certain genotypes by acting on the
phenotypes of certain organisms

Three modes of selection are


Directional
Disruptive
Stabilizing

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Directional selection
Favors individuals at one end of the
phenotypic range

Disruptive selection
Favors individuals at both extremes of the
phenotypic range

Stabilizing selection
Favors intermediate variants and acts against
extreme phenotypes
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Frequency of individuals

The three modes of selection

Original
population

Original population

Phenotypes (fur color)

Evolved
population

(a) Directional selection shifts the overall


makeup of the population by favoring
variants at one extreme of the
distribution. In this case, darker mice are
favored because they live among dark
rocks and a darker fur color conceals them
from predators.

(b) Disruptive selection favors variants


at both ends of the distribution. These
mice have colonized a patchy habitat
made up of light and dark rocks, with the
result that mice of an intermediate color are
at a disadvantage.

Fig 23.12 AC
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

(c) Stabilizing selection removes


extreme variants from the population
and preserves intermediate types. If
the environment consists of rocks of
an intermediate color, both light and
dark mice will be selected against.

The Preservation of Genetic Variation


Various mechanisms help to preserve genetic
variation in a population

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Diploidy
Diploidy
Maintains genetic variation in the form of
hidden recessive alleles

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Balancing Selection
Balancing selection
Occurs when natural selection maintains
stable frequencies of two or more phenotypic
forms in a population
Leads to a state called balanced polymorphism

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Heterozygote Advantage
Some individuals who are heterozygous at a
particular locus
Have greater fitness than homozygotes

Natural selection
Will tend to maintain two or more alleles at that
locus

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

The sickle-cell allele


Causes mutations in hemoglobin but also
confers malaria resistance
Exemplifies the heterozygote advantage

Distribution of
malaria caused by
Plasmodium falciparum
(a protozoan)

Figure 23.13
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Frequencies of the
sickle-cell allele
02.5%
2.55.0%
5.07.5%
7.510.0%
10.012.5%
>12.5%

Frequency-Dependent Selection
In frequency-dependent selection
The fitness of any morph declines if it becomes
too common in the population

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

An example of frequency-dependent selection


On pecking a moth image
the blue jay receives a
food reward. If the bird
does not detect a moth
on either screen, it pecks
the green circle to continue
to a new set of images (a
new feeding opportunity).

Parental population sample

Experimental group sample


Phenotypic diversity

0.06
0.05
0.04
Frequencyindependent control

0.03
0.02
0

Plain background

Patterned background

Figure 23.14
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

20

60
40
80
Generation number

100

Neutral Variation
Neutral variation
Is genetic variation that appears to confer no
selective advantage

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Sexual Selection
Sexual selection
Is natural selection for mating success
Can result in sexual dimorphism, marked
differences between the sexes in secondary
sexual characteristics

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Intrasexual selection
Is a direct competition among individuals of
one sex for mates of the opposite sex

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Intersexual selection
Occurs when individuals of one sex (usually
females) are choosy in selecting their mates
from individuals of the other sex
May depend on the showiness of the males
appearance

Figure 23.15
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

The Evolutionary Enigma of Sexual Reproduction


Sexual reproduction
Produces fewer reproductive offspring than asexual
reproduction, a so-called reproductive handicap
Sexual reproduction

Asexual reproduction
Generation 1

Female

Female

Generation 2

Male
Generation 3

Generation 4

Figure 23.16
Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

If sexual reproduction is a handicap, why has it


persisted?
It produces genetic variation that may aid in
disease resistance

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Why Natural Selection Cannot Fashion Perfect Organisms

Evolution is limited by historical constraints


Adaptations are often compromises

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

Chance and natural selection interact


Selection can only edit existing variations

Copyright 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin Cummings

You might also like