Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Appendix A and B in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering
Appendix A and B in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering
Appendix A and B in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering
Outline
1. Types of vibratory motion
Periodic loading : Simple Harmonic Motion
Nonperiodic loading
2. Fourier Series
3. SDOF
Undamped Free vibration
Damped Free vibration
Undamped forced vibration
Damped forced vibration
4. Response Spectrum
Periodic Loading:
Non-Periodic Loading:
It has same PERIOD elapsed for 1 cycle Random period (inconsistent interval
Ex: harmonic motion
Ex: impact loading, explosion,
falling weight, Earthquake
T
T
Impact loading
Earthquake loading
T
Periodic Loading
Harmonic Loading
T
A
IMPORTANT properties:
1. Amplitude (A)
2. Period (T)
3. Frequency (f)
4. Natural frequency ()
5. Phase ()
For 1 Sinusoidal:
For 2 Sinusoidal:
+b
Real part
(imaginary number)
Eulers law:
Imaginary part :
+b
Velocity
Acceleration
Complex
Non-Periodic Loading
Periodic Loading
Fourier Series
Developed by French mathematician, J.B.J. Fourier
Periodic function = as the SUM of a series of
simple harmonic loading
Different amplitude, frequency, and phase
Loading
Time Hystory
Calculation of
Summation of harmonic
The response of each load
Responses to create
For a SDOF system
complex time hystory of respon
Fourier representation
of loading time
hystory
as a sum of harmonic
Fourier Series :
1. Trigonometric forms
The Problem
0
-1
-0.5
0.5
1.5
-0.5
-1
-1.5
t(Tf)
Square wave
function
Fourier Series :
2. Exponential forms
Fourier Series :
3. Discrete Fourier Transforms (DFT)
Ground motion parameters are described by a finite number of data
Thus, fourier coefficient are obtained by summation rather than integration
That summation = The Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)
VIBRATING SYSTEM
Definition of Degress of Freedom:
The number of INDEPENDENT VARIABLES needed to describe
the motion of a system
Modes of vibration for foundation:
1) Longitudinal (translation about
y-axis)
2) Rocking (rotation about z-axis
3) Vertical (translation about zaxis)
4) Yawing (rotation about z-axis)
5) Lateral (translation about xaxis)
VIBRATING SYSTEM
Movement
Movement in
Only in
Vertical and rocking
Vertical direction
(2 DOF)
(1 DOF = SDOF)
m1, m2, m3
translation
(3 DOF)
Discrete system:
Mass concentrateted at a finite
Number of locations and have a
finite DoF
Infinite DOF
Infinite DOF
Continous system
Mass is distributed throughout syst
And have a infinite DOF
SDOF
Example of SDOF
Characteristic of SDOF:
1) M connected to a spring (K)
2) M connected to a dashpot
of viscous damping coeff.
(c)
3) M is subjected to external
loading (Q(t))
inerial force
viscous damping
Generalized system
fI =
fD =
force
Fs =
Q(t)=
m =
u(t)
c =
u(t)
K =
u(t) =
mass
= acceleration
coef of viscous damping
= velocity
spring constant
displacement
SDOF : Vibration of
Support
For earthquake engineering,
dynamic loads result from:
Static
condition
ub(t)
= displ acement of base
u(t) = displacement of frame relative to
base
ut(t)
= total displacement
ub+u
Critical damping
coefficient
Damping
ratio In EQ engineering, the structure are alwa
virtually underdamped, then :
he equation can be expressed as:
Therefore,
Harmonic Loading
Tuning Ratio:
Initial condition
C 2 = uo
he case, in which the system initially at rest in its equilibrium position (uo=uo=0
Responses
Responses
If = 1 = /, the displacement, u
When
harmonic loading applied at of SDOF
system, the response goes infinity ().. Infinity
indicating RESONANCE of the system.
In reality, because real system has damping,
Infinity is never reached, but it can become
Ub(t)=ubsint
See Ex B.1
After
ubtituting two previous equation into equation of motion & grouping the sin and
Response Spectra
nition
e MAX response (Acc, Vel, Disp) of all possible linear SDOF
Ground Acc (EQ loading)
SDOF system
T=
=
T=
=
T=
=
Deformation Response
Response Spectra
The response will depend on:
Mass (m)
Stiffness (k)
Damping ratio ()
D, V, and A values are the peak response of all possible linear SDF system
TUGAS 1
Tugas Vibratory Motions:
Braja M.Das. Principles of Soil Dynamics, 1993,
Hal 47-49 No. 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.7, & 2.8