Microblogging For Crisis Communication: Examination of Twitter Use in Response To A Violent Crisis

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 29

Microblogging for Crisis

Communication: Examination
of Twitter Use in Response to a
Violent Crisis

Thomas Heverin & Lisl Zach


Drexel University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Overview

• Purpose
• Description of Event
• Data collection & Methods
• Results
• Conclusion

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Purpose
• What types of information are transmitted over Twitter
during violent crises?

• Who is creating and sending the information?

• How can official response agencies use the information


transmitted on Twitter during violent crises?

www.ischool.drexel.edu
www.ischool.drexel.edu
November 29, 2009

Sgt. Mark Renninger, Ronald


Owens,Tina Griswold, and Greg
Richards

www.ischool.drexel.edu
“Four police officers shot dead in
coffee-shop ambush near Tacoma”

Tacoma News Tribune, McClatchy


Newspapers, November 29, 2009
www.ischool.drexel.edu
www.ischool.drexel.edu
Data Collection & Methodology

• Observations of Twitter usage


• Collected 6013 tweets (#washooting) Nov
29-Dec 1 via Twitter Search API
• Qualitatively coded data
– types of authors
– contents of messages
– trends of contents of messages

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Results

• Author types and characteristics


• Message types
• Trends of message types
• Observed behaviors

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Author Types

• 1668 unique authors of 6013 tweets


• Citizens:
– 91.5% of authors, contributed to 82.3% of the
tweets
• Local/national media:
– 4.5% of authors, 8.9% of the tweets
• Local government:
– < 1% of authors, < 1% of tweets

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Author Types

• 1668 unique authors


• Citizens:
– 91.5% of authors, contributed to 82.3% of the
tweets
• Local/national media:
– 4.5% of authors, 8.9% of the tweets
• Local government:
– < 1% of authors, < 1% of tweets

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Author Types

• 1668 unique authors


• Citizens:
– 91.5% of authors, contributed to 82.3% of the
tweets
• Local/national media:
– 4.5% of authors, 8.9% of the tweets
• Local government:
– < 1% of authors, < 1% of tweets

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Author Types

• 1668 unique authors


• Citizens:
– 91.5% of authors, contributed to 82.3% of the
tweets
• Local/national media:
– 4.5% of authors, 8.9% of the tweets
• Local government:
– < 1% of authors, < 1% of tweets

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Citizen Geographic Distribution

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)
• Opinion-related (17.8%)
• Technology-related (3.8%)
• Emotion-related (3.7%)
• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Information Broadcasting
• Photographs of suspect
• Background information about suspect
• Previous legal & criminal history of suspect
• License plate number of suspect’s get-away car
• Twitter & Facebook profiles of suspect
• Locations of alleged sightings
• Locations of police activity & response

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)
• Opinion-related (17.8%)
• Technology-related (3.8%)
• Emotion-related (3.7%)
• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)
• Opinion-related (17.8%)
• Technology-related (3.8%)
• Emotion-related (3.7%)
• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)
• Opinion-related (17.8%)
• Technology-related (3.8%)
• Emotion-related (3.7%)
• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)
• Opinion-related (17.8%)
• Technology-related (3.8%)
• Emotion-related (3.7%)
• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Message Types

• Information-related (79.0%)
• Opinion-related (17.8%)
• Technology-related (3.8%)
• Emotion-related (3.7%)
• Action-related (0.9%)

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Trends of Tweet content per 12 hour time period

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Behaviors Observed
• Collaboration
• Self-policing information
• Citing information sources & creating own
• Questioning information sources
• Technology instruction

www.ischool.drexel.edu
Conclusion

• In this case….
– citizens contributed the most to the stream of
messages
– #washooting primarily used for sharing crisis-
related information
• Future work
– retweets, information extraction &
visualization, law enforcement views on using
& monitoring Twitter

www.ischool.drexel.edu

You might also like