Professional Documents
Culture Documents
q3m1l4 Kontrasabenevolentassimilation 130919191209 Phpapp02
q3m1l4 Kontrasabenevolentassimilation 130919191209 Phpapp02
Benevolent Assimilation
January 5, 1899
General Otis styles himself Military Governor of these Islands, and I
protest one and a thousand times and with all the energy of my soul
against such authority. I proclaim solemnly that I have not recognized
either Singapore or in Hong Kong or in the Philippines, by word or in
writing, the sovereignty of America over this beloved soil. On the
contrary, I say that I returned to these Islands on an American warship
on the 19th of May last for the express purpose of making war on the
Spaniards to regain our liberty and independence. I stated this in my
proclamation of the 24th of May last, and I publish it in my Manifesto
addressed to the Philippine people on the 12th of June. Lastly, all this
was confirmed by the American General Merritt himself, predecessor of
General Otis, in his Manifesto to the Philippine people some days before
he demanded the surrender of Manila from the Spanish General
Jaudenes. In that Manifesto it is distinctly stated that the naval and field
forces of the United States had come to give us our liberty, by
subverting the bad Spanish Government, And I hereby protest against
this unexpected act of the United States claiming sovereignty over these
Islands. My relations with the United States did not bring me over here
from Hong Kong to make war on the Spaniards for their benefit, but for
the purpose of our own liberty and independence. . .
GAWAIN 1: Sagutin:
1. Sino ang may-akda ng manipesto?
A. PANGULONG WILLIAM
MC KINLEY
B. PANGULONG EMILIO
AGUINALDO
GAWAIN 1: Sagutin:
1. Sino ang may-akda ng manifesto?
A. PANGULONG WILLIAM
MC KINLEY
B. PANGULONG EMILIO
AGUINALDO
GAWAIN 1: Sagutin:
2. KAILAN ISINULAT ANG
MANIPESTO?
A. DISYEMBRE 21,1898
D. ENERO 5, 1899
GAWAIN 1: Sagutin:
2. KAILAN ISINULAT ANG
MANIPESTO?
A. DISYEMBRE 21,1898
D. ENERO 5, 1899
GAWAIN 1; Sagutin:
3. ANO ANG NAIS ILAHAD NG
MAY-AKDA SA KANIYANG
MANIPESTO?
GAWAIN1; Sagutin:
3. ANO ANG NAIS ILAHAD NG
MAY-AKDA SA KANIYANG
MANIPESTO?
GAWAIN 1; Sagutin:
B. ANG PAGKALUPIG
NG HUKBONG ESPANYOL
SA MGA AMERIKANO
NOONG MAYO 1, 1898
GAWAIN 1: Sagutin:
B. ANG PAGKALUPIG
NG HUKBONG ESPANYOL
SA MGA AMERIKANO
NOONG MAYO 1, 1898
GAWAIN 1: Sagutin:
D. PATATALSIKIN NG MGA
AMERIKANO ANG MGA
ESPANYOL SA PILIPINAS
Gawain 1:Sagutin:
D. PATATALSIKIN NG MGA
AMERIKANO ANG MGA
ESPANYOL SA PILIPINAS
GAWAIN 2:
-Happy face-kung damdamin ni Aguinaldo
-sad face kung hindi,pagkaraan ipaliwanag ang
General Otis styles
himself Military Governor of these Islands,
sagot
and I protest one and a thousand times and with all the energy
of my soul against such authority.
Paliwanag
And I hereby protest against this unexpected act of the United
States claiming sovereignty over these Islands.
Paliwanag
My relations with the United States did not bring me over here
from Hong Kong to make war on the Spaniards for their benefit,
but for the purpose of our own liberty and independence. . .
Paliwanag
Kung hindi ko
tinanggap ang
pamamahala ng mga
Amerikano
ANTI-IMPERIALIST LEAGUE
Address to the People of the United States Issued by the AntiImperialist League November 19, 1898 ----A true republic of free men must rest upon the principles that all
its citizens are equal under the law, that a government derives its
just powers from the consent of the governed, and that there
must be no taxation without representation. These principles
abandoned, a republic exists but in name, and its people lose their
rights as free men.
Planting itself upon these lasting truths, the people of the United
States solemnly declared in their Constitution that the citizens of
each State should have the privileges and immunities of citizens of
the several States; that all persons born or naturalized in the
United States and subject to its jurisdiction should be citizens of
the United States and of the several States; and that the rights of
none should be abridged on account of race, color, or previous
conditions of servitude. The Constitution gives to the United
States, no more than to the individual, the right to hold slaves or
vassals, and recognizes no distinction between classes of
citizens,--one with full rights as free men, and another as subjects
governed by military force.
We are in full sympathy with the heroic struggles for liberty of the people
in the Spanish Islands, and therefore we protest against depriving them of
their rights by an exchange of masters. Only by recognizing their rights as
free men are all their interests protected. Expansion by natural growth in
thinly-settled contiguous territory, acquired by purchase for the expressed
purpose of ultimate statehood, cannot be confounded with, or made
analogous to, foreign territory conquered by war and wrested by force
from a weak enemy. A beaten foe has no right to transfer a people whose
consent has not been asked, and a free republic has no right to hold in
subjection a people so transferred.
No American, until today, has disputed these propositions; it remains for the new
Imperialism to set up the law of might and to place commercial gain and a false
philanthropy above the sound principles upon which the Republic was based. In
defence of its position it has already urged the fallacy of the Declaration of
Independence and proclaimed a wisdom superior to that of the framers of the
Constitution. As solemnly as a people could, we announced the war to be solely for
humanity and freedom, without a thought, desire, or purpose of gain to ourselves;
all that we sought has been accomplished in Cuba's liberation. Shall we now prove
false to our declaration and seize by force islands thousands of miles away whose
peoples have not desired our presence and whose will we have not asked?
Sagutin:
I wanted the American eagle to go screaming into the Pacific ... Why not
spread its wings over the Philippines, I asked myself? ... I said to
myself, Here are a people who have suffered for three centuries. We can
make them as free as ourselves, give them a government and country of
their own, put a miniature of the American Constitution afloat in the
Pacific, start a brand new republic to take its place among the free
nations of the world. It seemed to me a great task to which we had
addressed ourselves. But I have thought some more, since then, and I
have read carefully the treaty of Paris [which ended the
Spanish-American War], and I have seen that we do not intend to free,
but to subjugate the people of the Philippines. We have gone there to
conquer, not to redeem. It should, it seems to me, be our pleasure and
duty to make those people free, and let them deal with their own
domestic questions in their own way. And so I am an anti-imperialist. I
am opposed to having the eagle put its talons on any other land
Sagutin:
1.
Saan inihalintulad ang Estados
Unidos?
2. Ano ang ginawa ng Estados
Unidos?
3. Ano ang gusto niyang gawin ng
Estados Unidos sa Pilipinas?
4. bakit gusto niyang gawing malaya
Ang Pilipinas?
5. Bakit niya sinabing Great Task
ang gusto niyang mangyari?