Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Why Not Punish The Insane? Consequentialist
Why Not Punish The Insane? Consequentialist
Why Not Punish The Insane? Consequentialist
Consequentialist
Itisfutiletodoso.
Insanepeoplecantbedeterredbythreatof
punishment.
But,theinsanitydefensecanweakenthe
deterrenceofthesane,ifitcanbefaked.
DeontologicalReasons
Nofairwarning.Insanepeoplecannot
understand,appreciatethewarning.
Desertandresponsibility.Insaneoffenders
couldnothelpbutviolatethelaw,soare
notresponsiblefortheiractions.
Pityratherthanangeristheenlightened
response.
VersionsoftheDefense
MNaughtenrule:
laboringundersuchadefectofreason,fromdisease
ofthemind,asnottoknowthenatureandqualityof
theacthewasdoing;or,ifhedidknowit,thathedid
notknowthatwhatwewasdoingwaswrong.
ALIModelPenalCode
Asaresultofmentaldiseaseordefect,helacks
substantialcapacityeithertoappreciatethecriminality
(orwrongness)ofhisconductortoconformhis
conducttotherequirementsofthelaw.
ThreeprongsoftheALIcode:
Intellectual(Afailuretoknowthatwhathe
wasdoingwaswrong.)
Affective/emotional(Afailuretoappreciate
emotionallythewrongnessoftheact.)
Volitional(Aninabilitytoresisttheimpulse
toperformtheact.)
Presupposes:duetomentalillnessordefect.
Abolition(theMensReaapproach)
Duetosomementaldisease,theoffenderdid
nothavetheknowledgeorintention
requiredbythedefinitionoftheoffense.
Morealternatives
Lossofcontrol(Parsonsv.State,Alabama
1887):(i)lossof(some)powertochoose
betweenrightandwrong(ii)sofarasto
destroyfreeagencyatthetime,(iii)due
entirelytomentalillnessordistress.
Durhamrule:theunlawfulconductwasthe
productofmentaldiseaseormentaldefect.
ConsequentialistObjectionstothe
ALIModelCode
Insanitydefenseweakensdeterrence:criminals
canavoidpunishmentthroughfakery.
Psychopathy(lackofnormalfeelings)isnotreally
amentaldisease,isvirtuallyuntreatable.
Psychopathscanbedeterredbythreatof
punishment.
Underminesrespectforthelaw.Expressiveand
educativefunctionsaresuppressed.Needfor
vengeanceunsatisfied.
Anotherobjection
Itisimpossibletodecidethevolitional
prongonscientificorcommonsense
grounds.Experttestimonyonthispointis
amorphous,inconsistent.(Bonnie)
Deontologicalobjections
Ineffectivenessofdeterrenceisnotasufficient
reasontobarpunishment:somesaneoffenders
aresodeterminedintheirpurposesthatno
threatcandeterthem.
Thereisnoprincipledreasonforsinglingout
onecauseofbehavior(mentalillness)as
exculpatory.Ifcausedbehaviorshouldbe
excused,abettercasecouldbemadeforan
excusebasedonsocialdeprivation.(Morrison)
Treatsmentallyillassubhuman.
IsCausationofBehavioraValid
Excuse?
Compatibilistsbelievethatwecan
distinguishbetweenwhatanagentis
responsibleforandwhatheisnot,evenif
allbehavioriscaused/determinedbyprior
conditions.
Incompatibilistsdenythis.
Compatibilists:TheUtilitarians
BritishUtilitariantradition:Bentham,
JamesMill,JohnStuartMill
Whetherbehaviorhasacausedoesnt
matter;whatmattersisthatithaseffects.
Thetestofresponsiblebehavior:coulditbe
affectedbythreatofpunishmentorofferof
reward?
Incompatibilists:
HardDeterminists
B.F.Skinner,behaviorism.
Believethatfreedomandresponsibilityare
prescientificmyths.
Denytheexistenceoftheautonomous
self
Replacetheoriesofdesertandblamewith
effectivebehaviortechnology.
Incompatibilists:
MetaphysicalLibertarians
Believethatresponsible,freebehaviordoes
exist,andisnotdeterminedbyprior
conditions.
Thewillmakessomeirreducibleand
ultimatelymysteriouscontribution.
Somebelieveinagentcausation:actions
causedbytheagent,andnotbyanystates
orconditionsoftheagent/environment.
TheTransferArgumentfor
Incompatibilism
Wearenotresponsibleforconditionspriortoour
birth.
Ifdeterminismistrue,theseconditionsnecessitate
allofourchoices.
Transferprinciple:ifxisnotresponsibleforA,
andAnecessitatesB,thenxisnotresponsiblefor
B.
So,noneofusareresponsibleforanyofour
choices,ifdeterminismistrue.
AProblemforHardDeterminists
Ifthereisnobasisfortheideaofdesert,
thenthereisnoreasontoincarcerateonly
theguilty.
Preventativeincarcerationofpeoplewho
canbepredictedtobedangerouswouldbe
justified.
Mandatorybehaviormodification:A
ClockworkOrange?
AProblemforLibertarians
Isindeterminismsufficientfor
responsibility?
Itwouldseemthatonewhobreaksthelaw,
asaresultofanuncausedeventuality,is
simplyunlucky.
Ifitismerelyamatterofchancewhich
impulsesareactedon,whyholdthe
individualresponsible?Ifnotchance,
mustnttherebesomesufficientcondition?
IrresistibleImpulses?
Themodelofirresistibleimpulsesseemstodraw
onimplausiblepictureofourmentallife.
Asifwehadinourheadsalittleperson(homunculus)
whodecidedwhichimpulsestoresist,andhow
vigorously.
Aninfiniteregress:arethereirresistibleimpulsesinside
thehomunculus?
Forlibertarians,anyactionthatispredetermined
isduetoanirresistibleimpulse,andsonottruly
voluntary.
CompatibilistAccountsofLoss
ofResponsibility
Motiveswhicharebizarreorodd.(Hinckley?)
Impulsessopowerful,onemustactonthem,
nomatterhowstrongonesreasonstodo
otherwise.(Doeitheroftheserequireillness?)
Actionswhosetruemotiveishiddenfromthe
agenthimself(neuroticcompulsion)
Actionswhosemotivesdonotcohere
harmoniouslywiththeagentsothermotives
andinterests.(Evenifnotduetoillness?)
Actingonamotivetheagentwisheshedidnot
have(conflictwithsecondorderdesires).
Actingonthebasisofbeliefsordecision
makingprocessesthataredisruptedbyamental
disorder.Forexample:delusions(beliefsthat
areimmunetousualkindsofevidence).Whatif
theimmunityisduetostupidityoreducational
deprivation?
Canwefindaunifyingthemeorthemes?
Irrationality?True/falseself?
ProblemsforCompatibilists
Arebizarredesiresanystronger,lessresistible
thannormalones?
Criminalsoftenactirrationally,againsttheirown
interests:e.g,revenge.
Manyordinarypeoplehaveincoherentdesires,or
desirestheywouldrathernothave.
Selfconcealedmotives:alsocommoninordinary
people.Whyexculpatory?
Morequestions
Illnessalonecannotconstitutethe
differencebetweensaneandinsane.
Manycriminalactsarebothsickand
voluntary:e.g.,childmolesters,
exhibitionists,sadists.
Thepunishmentoftheillcandeter.
Isthereaviablecompatibilistaccountof
insanity?
ProceduralIssues
Shouldtheburdenofproofbeshiftedtothe
defense?
Ifthetrulyinsanedefendantisinnocent,
cansuchashiftbejustified?
Limitingtheroleofexpertwitnesses?
LimitingtheRoleofExperts
Excludingtestimonyaboutchildhood
hardships,becauseofundueemotional
impact.
Excludespeculativetheoriesabout
diagnosis:simpledescriptionsofbeliefs,
intentionsandfeelingsonly.
Howtodealwithideologicalbiasand
gullibility?Specialtraining,qualifications?
Islimitingexperttestimony
justifiable?
Canwedenydefendantstheuseof
favorableexperttestimony?
Wouldthisviolatetheirconstitutional
rights?
DispositionoftheCriminally
Insane
Doesitlessenthestigmatolabelthem
"innocent",ratherthan"guiltybutmentally
ill"?
Mandatorytreatmentvs."punishment
Insanecanbeheldindefinitely:Jonesv.
U.S.463US354(1983).
TermofConfinement
Confinementuntilcured:howisthis
measured?
Alowerbound,equivalenttothesentence
ofsaneoffenders?
Thesamelimit,asanupperbound?
Iftermsofconfinementaresynchronized
withcriminaldesert,isthedistinction
betweenguilty&innocenceobliterated?
TheJoyBakercase
WouldBakerhavebeenfoundguilty,
applyingonlythemensreatest?
Wouldshehavebeenfoundguilty,applying
theMNaughtonrule?TheALIcode?
Isitmorallyoutrageoustopunishsomeone
likeJoyBaker?Wouldguiltybutmentally
illbeappropriate?Doesitunfairly
stigmatizetheinnocent?
Mentalillnessvs.social
deprivation
Ifitistruethatsocialdeprivationisabetter
predictorofcriminalactivitythanmental
illness,isitreasonabletodefendthe
insanitydefensebutnotanequivalent
defensefromsocialdeprivation?
TheVolitionalProng
Shouldcompulsivedisorders(kleptomania,
pyromania)becoveredbytheinsanity
defense?Whyorwhynot?
Isiteverpossibletoprovethatanimpulse
wasirresistible?Doesthequestionhavea
clearmeaning?
Isitrelevant(asBonnieclaims)that
acquittalinthesecasesisoutoftouchwith
commonlysharedmoralintuitions?