Paper ID: 2452

Design and Evaluation

of Network-Based
Distributed Mobility
Management Solution
Based on PFMIPv6

M. Balfaqih, M.Ismail,
R.Nordin, Z. Balfaqih and
T. Yuwono

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Outline
Introduction
Network-Based Distributed
Mobility Management Solution
Performance Analysis
Results
Conclusion

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Introduction
Taxonomy of IP Mobility Management Solutions

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Introduction
CMM Centralized Mobility Management
LMA Local Mobility Anchor
MAG Mobile Access Gateway
AP Access Point
MN Mobile Node
CN Corresponding Node

CMM, PMIPv6 Architecture

4

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Proposal
Network-Based Distributed
Mobility Management Solution

Initial Registration Operation

DMM Distributed Mobility Management
MAAR - Mobile Anchor Access Router
CMD Central Mobility Database

Moving from
CMA to DMM
5

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Proposal

Initial Registration Operation

6

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Proposal

Handover Management Operation in First Roaming

7

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Proposal

Handover Management
Operation in First
Roaming

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Proposal
Handover Management Operation in Second Roaming

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Proposal

Handover Management
Operation in Second
Roaming

10

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Performance
Performance Metrics

11

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Performance
Handover Timeline of the IETF Proposal

Handover

Latency (HL):
( IETF )
IETF
T HL
T L 2 T Auth T Binding
IETF
CMD
MA AR
T Binding
2d MU MA AR (c ) 2d CMD MAA R (c ) T PC
2T PC

Packet

Loss (PL):

IET F
PL IET F LdT SR

IETF
T SRIETF (T HL
d MU MAAR (c )) d MA AR MAAR (d ) d MU MAAR (d )
12

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Performance
Handover Timeline of the Network-based DMM Proposed Solution

Handover

Latency (HL):
proposed
T HL
((2d MU MA AR (c ) T HI ) (( L 2 T Auth ) x ))
MA AR
T HI 2d MAA R MA AR (c ) T PC

Packet

Loss (PL):

PL proposed Ld (max{d MU MA A R (c ) T HI ) , 0} max{T Buffering B , 0}

T Buffering (d MU MAAR (c ) ((T L 2 T Auth ) x ) d MAAR MAAR (d )

13

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Handover Latency

Results

14

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Results
Packet Loss

15

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Conclusion
We can conclude from the analysis that
the proposed solution reduces the
handover latency and the packet loss
significantly comparing to IETF proposal.
Increasing the time between receiving
report message and when the MUs link
goes down increases the handover
latency of the proposed solution.

16

2016 Dr.MBI@UKM

Thank you
http://www.ukm.my/mahamod
mahamod@ukm.edu.my
mahamod@gmail.com
019-2615404/019-3275425
03-89216326