SIX MONTHS INDUSTRIAL TRAINING

At
TATA FICOSA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS LTD
(TATA AUTOCOMP SYSTEMS LTD.)
Prepared By:Harish Kumar
Univ. R. No.- 123456789
KEYSTONE GROUP OF INSTITUTIONS
RAJASTHAN TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

GROUP PROFILE
TACO (TATA AUTOCOMP SYSTEMS LTD.)
Group is founded by TATA group in 1995.
Group offers a range of auto component
products and services to automotive
manufacturers
Have 14 business units, 3 engineering
centers & 3 Export oriented units
Has total workforce of 6700
Group office is in Pune & head quarter in
Mumbai

COMPANY PROFILE
TATA FICOSA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS
LTD.
BUSINESS UNIT: TACO
JOINT VENTURE: 50% TACO & 50%
FICOSA INTERNATIONAL, SPAIN
YEAR OF ESTABLISHMENT: 1998

COMMODITIES

IRVM

ORVM

PBL

WASHER SYSTEM

GSL

CONTROL CABLES

CUSTOMERS

QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPT.

Quality refers to the characteristics and desired
properties of anything.
Quality Assurance Dept. ensures the quality and its
implementation in the company.
FUCTIONS:
Conformance of quality at every stage of work
To implement quality policies
To follow quality standards

SUB-DEPT. OF QA

QUALITY ASSURANCE

RECEIVING
INSPECTIO
N

PROCESS
QUALITY

STA

CUSTOME
R
SUPPORT

PROJECT

IMPROVEMENT IN CHILD
PART QUALITY PLAN
(CPQP)

PURPOSE

To make CPQP more robust and to control

shop & customer rejections

CPQP DETAILS

CPQP (Child Part Quality Plan) refers to the

quality plan of any child part which includes
Important Dimensions
Class (SC, CC, KCC, CEC, D/TLD)
Method of Measurement
Quality Standard
Reaction Plan

ACTIVITIES

To review the Child Part Quality Plan

(CPQP) related to parts supplied to:(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

FORD
(9) JOHN DEERE
GMI
(10) FIAT
MRL
(11) NISSAN
M&M
(12) HONDA
VW
TML
HINDUSTAN
BROSE

METHODOLOGY
1. To take hard copies of CPQP and Drawings

To study SC/CC (Significant/Critical Characteristics)

Ensure if all SC/CCs are mentioned in CPQP, if not,
modify CPQP
Check the necessary dimensional parameters,
tolerances & material specifications, if not present
then modify CPQP

2. Take note of customer complaints from shop

and QA

Check whether these complaints are addressed in

CPQP, if not, modify CPQP

3. To take note of internal complaints from shop

and QA

Check whether these complaints are addressed in

CPQP, if not, modify CPQP

CPQP REVIEW w.r.t. DWG.

Sr. No.

CUSTOMER

CPQPs REVIEWED

FORD

141

GMI

127

MRL

67

M&M

65

VW

92

TML

262

HINDUSTAN

38

BROSE

28

JOHN DEERE

10

FIAT

20

11

NISSAN

22

12

HONDA

10

TOTAL CPQP CORRECTED

Sr. No.

CUSTOMER

CPQPs CORRECTED

FORD

38

GMI

34

MRL

22

M&M

17

VW

26

TML

60

HINDUSTAN

26

BROSE

JOHN DEERE

10

FIAT

11

NISSAN

10

12

HONDA

CPQP CORRECTED w.r.t. SC/CC, DIMENSIONS,

TOLERANCE & MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS

Sr. No.

CUSTOMER

CPQPs CORRECTED

FORD

30

GMI

27

MRL

18

M&M

17

VW

12

TML

60

HINDUSTAN

26

BROSE

JOHN DEERE

10

FIAT

11

NISSAN

10

12

HONDA

CPQP CORRECTED w.r.t. CUSTOMER

COMPLAINTS

Sr. No.

CUSTOMER

CPQPs CORRECTED

FORD

GMI

MRL

M&M

VW

TML

HINDUSTAN

BROSE

JOHN DEERE

10

FIAT

11

NISSAN

12

HONDA

CPQP CORRECTED w.r.t. IN-HOUSE

COMPLAINTS

Sr. No.

CUSTOMER

CPQPs CORRECTED

FORD

GMI

MRL

M&M

VW

TML

HINDUSTAN

BROSE

JOHN DEERE

10

FIAT

11

NISSAN

12

HONDA

CONCLUSIONS

This project was very helpful for control over

rejections. It is concluded that to make CPQP robust,
a through revision is required time to time. Training
should be provided to Quality Inspectors to make
them aware and to capture the non-conformities.

THANK YOU