Level

of
Assessm
ent

Level
3
Utilization
of
Resources
(People,
Peso,
Physical
Assets)

Findings
(Data/Evidence)

Strengths Weaknes
ses

A. People
On Teacher-Pupil
Ratio
K

S
2012-2013
2013-2014
2014-2015

1:22
1:25
1:24

1:27
1:27
1:26

1:29
1:30
1:26

2015-2016

1:21

1:25

1:28

Based from the

ratio generated

NO

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)
On Unfilled
Teaching/NonTeaching Personnel
(As of March 2016)
ELEMENTARY
Teaching
Teacher I7
Teacher II 6
Teacher III 11
MT I 2

Strengt
hs
Weaknesse
s

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)
Non-Teaching
ASDS
1
PSDS
2
PIII
1
PI 3
Accountant III
1
HEPO III
1
Statistician Aide
1
Admin Aide IV 4

Strengt
hs
Weaknesse
s

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)

Strengt
hs
Weaknesse
s

On Unfilled
Teaching/NonTeaching Personnel
(As of March 2016)
SECONDARY

Teaching
Teacher I3
Teacher II 2
Teacher III 2
MT I 1

Unfilled
teaching
items causes
teachers
handle multigrade

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)
On Unfilled
Teaching/NonTeaching Personnel
(As of March 2016)
SHS

Teaching
SST I
4
Non-Teaching
Asst. SP II 3
ADOF II 6

Strengt
hs
Weaknesse
s

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)
On Unfilled
Teaching/NonTeaching Personnel
(As of March 2016)
Non-Teaching
ADAS II 52
PDO I
2

Strengt
hs
Weaknesse
s

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)
Non-Teaching
Head Teacher III 1
Administrative Officer
IV 1 Guidance
Counselor III 2
School Librarian II 1
Admin Aide III
1
Admin Aide IV
2
Admin Aide VI
1

Strengt
hs
Weaknesse
s
Unfilled nonteaching
items causes
delays on
submitting
reports and
other office
transactions.

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)
B. Physical Assets
On ClassroomPupil/Student Ratio
E
S
2012-2013
1:21
1:37
2013-2014
1:21
1:37
2014-2015
1:21
1:37
2015-2016
1:21

Strength
s
Weakness
es
Accommodat
ion of 3
NQESH
passers for
the position
of Asst.
School
Principal II

Delay of
benefits due to
SHS teachers
due to lack of
personnel

Immediate and
judiciously
spending of
Decreases
SHS funds
unemployme would not be
nt rate
possible

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)
On Internet
Connectivity
ELEM
SEC
Year 2014- 23 58
Year 2015- 23 59
Year 2016SCHOOLS

ALL

Strength
s
Weakness
es
To
expanded
communica
tions or
beyond
current
projections,
and to
boost
internet
promotion
of data

TELCOS
cannot
provide
efficient and
effective
internet
connection.
Some Schools
are not
properly
utilizing their

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)

Strength
s
Weakness
es

DepEd Computerization
Program (DCP)

Some
teachers do
not like to
meet &
embrace 21st
Century
Education.

To
strengthen
DCP Packages delivered the ICT
capabilities
and installed since 2008
of teachers
with different packages. and
Primary Schools
Multimedia
students
Packages
Elementary 1 server
for meet
6 Thin Clients
the
2 laptop
challenges
1 LCD Projector
1 Multimedia Speaker
of 21st
Secondary 7 Servers
Century
42 Thin Clients

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)

Strength
s
Weakness
es

On Ancillary Facilities
in school
C. PESO
Utilization of MOOE
by expense category:
Water 100%
Electricity 100%
Other Supplies 100%
School/Office Supplies
100%

Fully
Utilized &
Implement
ed

From the
monitoring
group some
funds are not
properly

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)

Strength
s
Weakness
es

On Ancillary Facilities
in school
C. PESO
Utilization of MOOE
by expense category:
Training 100%
Traveling 100%
Representation 100%
Transportation 100%
Labor 100%

Fully
Utilized &
Implement
ed

From the
monitoring
group some
funds are not
properly

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)

Strength
s
Weakness
es

On Ancillary Facilities
in school
C. PESO
Utilization of MOOE
by expense category:
Repair 100%
Communication 100%

Fully
Utilized &
Implement
ed

From the
monitoring
group some
funds are not
properly

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Findings
(Data/Evidence)

Strength
s
Weakness
es

On MOOE
Liquidation

Elementary 93%
Secondary 88%

Most
Schools
were able
to
liquidate
as to
document

Absence of
WFP, APP,
SIP and
PPMP
Issuances
of credit
notice,
suspension

Findings
(Data/Evidence)

Level
of
Assessm
ent

Strengt
hs
Weaknes
ses

Percentage of Liquidation per

Program

ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY

Program Downloaded
Percentage
MOOE 200 M
91%
SBM
30 M
100%
SBFP
9.5 M
93%

Liquidated
182 M
30 M
8.9 M

FULLY
Download
ed

Absence of
WFP, APP, SIP
and PPMP
Not fully
liquidated
Non
involvement
of School

Members: Level 3
Jane P. Manalang
Salvacion P. Pulido
Julimar R. Buquing
Arcelyn A. Rola