THIRD REVIEW

TRANSIENT STABILITY
ENHANCEMENT OF MUTIMACHINE
SYSTEM USING DIFFERENTIAL
EVOLUTION ALGORITHM
STUDENTS

REGISTRATION NUMBER

Aravindh S

12009105004

Arun Seshadri R

12009105008

Durairaj S

12009105028

Venkatesh V

12009105105

GUIDE: Mr. M. Jagadeesh Kumar AP III EEE

MULTIMACHINE SYSTEM
Most power system have many generating stations, each
with several generators, and many loads, most of which
are combination of synchronous motors, synchronous
condensers, induction motors, lamps, heating devices,
and others. This is called multimachine system.

TRANSIENT STABILITY
It is the ability of the power system to maintain
synchronism
when
subjected
severe
transient
disturbances. The study period of interest is usually 3-5
seconds after the fault.

ABSTRACT
The project deals with the transient
stability
enhancement
of
a
multimachine power system using a
STATCOM controlled by Feedback
Linearization
Controller.
The
controller is optimized by differential
evolution algorithm.

STANDARD IEEE 9 BUS DATA

Bno Bcode V
1 1 1.04
2 2 1.025
3 2 1.025
4 0 1.0
5
6
7
8
9

0
0
0
0
0

1
1
1
1
1

ang Pd Qd Pg
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

125
90
0
100
0

50
30
0
35
0

Qg qmin
0
0
163
0
85
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

qmax
0
0
0
0

mvar
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

0
0
0
0
0

LINEDATA:
nl
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
7
8

nr
4
7
9
5
6
7
9
8
9

R
0
0
0
0.01
0.017
0.032
0.039
0.0085
0.0119

X
B/2
linetap
0.0576 0
1
0.0625 0
1
0.0586 0
1
0.085
0.088
1
0.092
0.079
1
0.161
0.153
1
0.17
0.179
1
0.072
0.0745 1
0.1008 0.1045 1

GENERATOR DATA
gen xd'
H
Td0' Tq0'
1

xd

xq

xq'

j*0.0608 23.64 0.146 0.0969 0.0969 8.96

0.31
2 j*0.1198 6.4
0.8958 0.8645 0.1969 6
0.535
3 j*0.1813 3.01
1.3125 1.2578 0.25
5.89
0.6

System Parameters
STATCOM
Rp=0.04 p.u
Xp=0.1 p.u
Rdc=150
C=5000uF
PI Controller
Kps=1, Kis=10, Kpq=5, Kiq=1666
Kpc=0.1,Kic=1, Kpd=50, Kid=1667
Feedback Linearization Controller
K11=1, K12=0.0025
K22=3500,K23=10000,K21=35
Feedback Linearization Controller Tuned by Differential
Evolution
K11= 2, K12= 1
K22=1875 ,K23= 15625, K21=75

Feedback Linearization
Definition:
Basic idea is to algebraically transform a
non-linear models into linear models
It is different from conventional linearization
(Jacobian) as it is more accurate due to the
usage of state transformations

Usage

Here,
u= control parameters
X= input state vector
k,z= parameters for linear
feedback system

 Control inputs for STATCOM are

Input State Vector is

Final voltages fed to the STATCOM after dq transformation are

COMPARISON BETWEEN PI AND

FBLC CONTROLLER
Graphs shown below provide us a
comparison between PI and FBLC controllers.
Load angle of the three generators and the
STATCOM voltage during fault is shown
below.
_._._._. STATCOM WITH PI CONTROLLER
STATCOM WITH FBLC CONTROLLER

GENERATOR 1-2 ROTOR ANGLE

GENERATOR 1-3 ROTOR ANGLE

GENERATOR 3-2 ROTOR ANGLE

STATCOM VOLTAGE AT BUS 8

DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION
ALGORITHM

Differential evolution is one of the most

powerful stochastic real parameter
optimization algorithms in current use.

Unlike traditional EAs the DE variants

perturb the current generation population
members with the scaled differences of
randomly selected and distinct population
members.

Differential evolution as an
attractive optimization tool
Compared to most other EAs, DE is much more
simple and straightforward to implement and
the space complexity of DE is low.
The number of control parameters in DE is very
few(Cr, F, and NP in classical DE).
Three main control parameters of the DE
algorithm: the mutation scale factor F , the
crossover constant Cr and the population size
NP.

IMPLEMENTATION OF DE FOR FBLC

CONTROLLER
The output of FBLC controller are Vdc
and Vs
These are determined by asymptotic
pole tracking method
The constant K11,K12,K21,K22,K23
are determined from the poles polev
and poledc
These poles are optimized using
differential evolution algorithm.

COMPARISON BETWEEN FBLC

CONTROLLER AND FBLC TUNED WITH DE

Graphs shown below provide us a

comparison between FBLC and FBLC
tuned with DE.
Load angle of the three generators
and the STATCOM voltage during
fault is shown below.

GENERATOR 1-2 ROTOR ANGLE

GENERATOR 1-3 ROTOR ANGLE

GENERATOR 3-2 ROTOR ANGLE

STATCOM VOLTAGE AT BUS 8

REFERENCES
1. Swagatam Das and B.K. Panigrahi, Non linear control of
STATCOM for stabilization of synchronous generator Engineering
Modelling 16 (2003) 3-4, 111-120 UDC 519.61:621.313.13
2. Ouassima AKHRIF, Francis-Aim6 OKOU, Louis-A. DESSAINT, Roger
CHAMPAGNE,Application of a Multivariable Feedback
Linearization Scheme for Rotor Angle Stability and Voltage
Regulation of Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on Power
Systems, Vol. 14, No. 2, May 1999.
3. Swagatam Das and Ponnuthurai Nagaratnam Suganthan,
Differential Evolution: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art IEEE
Transactions on Evolutionary computation.,vol.15.,No 11.,Feb
2011.

3. Amara, S.; Hsan, H.A., Power system stability improvement

by FACTS devices: A comparison between STATCOM, SSSC
and UPFC , IEEE Conference Publications on Renewable
Energies and Vehicular Technology (REVET), 2012.
4. Jon Are Suul, Marta Molinas, and Tore Undeland, STATCOMBased
Indirect Torque Control of Induction Machines
During Voltage Recovery After Grid Faults, IEEE
Transactions on Power Electronics vol. 25, NO. 5, MAY
2010
5. Amara, S.; Hsan, H.A., Power system stability improvement
by FACTS devices: A comparison between STATCOM, SSSC
and UPFC , IEEE Conference Publications on Renewable
Energies and Vehicular Technology (REVET), 2012.