Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Profitability Ratios: A) Gross Profit Margin B) Operating Profit Margin C) Net Profit Margin
Profitability Ratios: A) Gross Profit Margin B) Operating Profit Margin C) Net Profit Margin
2014
2015
gross profit
100%
revenue
10,628.7
100%
10,628.7
100%
gross profit
100%
revenue
11,235.1
100%
11,235.1
100%
gross profit
100%
revenue
11,721.6
100%
11,721.6
100%
Analysis:
the gross profit margin for the three years remains
constant, i.e. 100%
zero cost of goods sold being incurred for every RM 1
revenue earned in each year.
Gross profit margin is not a reliable ratio to be used to
assess the performance of a service-based company due
to the nature of such company to not have direct costs
that are attributable to the services renderred.
2013
OI
100 %
revenue
1,373.6
100 %
10,628.7
12.92 %
2014
OI
100%
revenue
1,299.1
100%
11,235.1
11.56%
2015
OI
100%
revenue
1,230.5
100%
11,721.6
10.50%
*OI : Operating
2013
2014 2015
10,62 11,23
8.7
5.1
11,72
1.6
9,378 10,09
.3
5.1
10,58
8.2
Analysis:
The operating profit margin measures the efficiency of profit
generation of a company, in which has declined
ORthroughtout the years.
For example, OPM of 12.92% for year 2013 implies
that5.71%
the company
%
earns only 12.92 cents of profit for every RM1 revenue generated from
4.33%
its provision of services before taking into account taxation, interest
OC
expense and other income.
7.64%
%
This ratio is a good measure of business performance as it places
emphasis on recurring profits of a business which are not affected
by
4.88%
2013
PBT
100%
revenue
1,046.0
100%`
10,628.7
9.84%
2014
PBT
100%
revenue
1,105.5
100%
11,235.1
9.84%
2015
PBT
100%
revenue
911.8
100%
11,721.6
7.78%
2013
PBT
reve
-nue
PBT
%
2014
1,046. 1,105.
00
50
10,62
8.70
2015
911.8
0
11,235 11,72
.10
1.60
5.69%
-17.52%
reve
-nue
5.71%
Analysis:
%
The net profit margin remains constant in 2013 and 2014
4.33%
and declined slightly in 2015.
This implies that the company earned lesser net profit of
7.78 cents in 2015 as compared to 9.84 cents in 2013 and
2014 for every RM1 of its revenue.
This is notably so due to the increase in the company's
finance cost and foreign exchange loss on its borrowings,
which in turn reduces its profit before tax by 17.5%.