Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Implantation
Implantation
Implantation
Osseointegration
Biomechanics of osseointegrated
implant.
Oral Implant:
A device or inert substance, biologic or
alloplastic, that is surgically inserted into soft or
hard tissues, to be used for functional or
cosmetic purposes.
Oral Implant:
A permucosal device which is biocompatible and
biofunctional and is placed within mucosa or, on
or within the bone associated with the oral cavity
to provide support for fixed or removable
prosthetics.
Introduction
Examples
Examples
Examples
Osseointegration
A time-dependant healing process where by
clinically symptomatic rigid fixation of
alloplastic materials is achieved, and
maintained, in bone during functional
loading. (Zarb & Albrektson,1991)
Bone Quality
Quality I
Was composed of homogenous compact bone, usually found in the
anterior lower jaw.
Quality II
Had a thick layer of cortical bone surrounding dense trabecular bone,
usually found in the posterior lower jaw.
Quality III
Had a thin layer of cortical bone surrounding dense trabecular bone,
normally found in the anterior upper jaw but can also be seen in the
posterior lower jaw and the posterior upper jaw.
Quality IV
Had a very thin layer of cortical bone surrounding a core of lowdensity trabecular bone, It is very soft bone and normally found in the
posterior upper jaw. It can also be seen in the anterior upper jaw.
Surgical technique
Minimal tissue violence at surgery is essential
for proper osseointegration.
Careful cooling while surgical drilling is performed at
low rotatory rates.
Use of sharp drills.
Use of graded series of drills.
Proper drill geometry is important, as intermittent
drilling.
The insertion torque should be of a moderate level
because strong insertion torques may result in
stress concentrations around the implant, with
subsequent bone resorption.
Loading condition
Delayed loading:
Immediate loading:
Biomechanics of osseointegrated
implant
In all incidences of clinical loading, occlusal forces are first
introduced to the prosthesis and then reach the bone implant
interface via the implant. So far, many researchers have,
therefore, focused on each of these steps of force transfer to
gain insight into the biomechanical effect of several factors
such as
Overall
What is the most practical and feasible
implant treatment that will produce optimal
chewing function and optimal cosmetic
results in a timely and affordable manner?
Diagnosis and
Treatment Planning
The evaluation of a patient as a suitable candidate for
implants should follow the same basic format as the
standard patient evaluation, although some areas
require additional emphasis and attention:
Medical History.
Psychological Status.
Dental History.
Diagnostic phase
Problem list & treatment considerations
radiographic analysis
surgical analysis
esthetic analysis
3. Occlusal Forces
The maximum bite force of subjects with a
mandibular denture supported by implants is 60 to
200% higher than that of subjects with a conventional
denture
Edentulous patients that are predisposed to
clenching and bruxing may be given the necessary
"tools" to begin parafunctional habits once the implant
bar is secured in place.
5. Implant Size
The greater the surface area of the implant-bone system,
the less concentrated the force transmitted to the crest of
bone at the implant interface. Similarly, the greater the
surface area of the implant-bone system, the better the
prognosis for the implant.
For each 0.25 mm increase in diameter, the surface area
of a cylinder increases by more than 10 per cent;
For each 3.0 mm increase in length , the surface area of
a cylinder increases by more than 10 per cent.
6. Implant Location
7. Arch configuration
Mandibular arch forms may be classified as tapered or
square.
With tapered arch forms, the most posterior right and left
implants in a four-implant treatment are often placed well
around the "turn" of the arch, creating a "U" shaped
design that is well suited to cantilevering,
With a square arch, the four implants are usually placed in
a relatively straight line. This "straight line" bar design is
not well suited to cantilevering.
9. Cantilevering
Treatment Planning
When all the diagnostic information has been assembled, a
variety of available treatment options must be assessed:
1. One-Implant Overdenture
2. Two-Implant Overdenture
3. Three-Implant Overdenture
4. Four-Implant Overdenture
5. Five-Implant Overdenture
Outline
Cont
Preservation of bone.
Retrievability.
Resistance to disease.
Increased confidence.
Conclusions
References.
2.
3.
Cont
1.
2.
3.
Advancement of technical
procedures (CADCAM).
Many training courses are
offered by universities,
professional societies and
implant manufacturers.
Profitable.
Successful implant
Successful Osseointegration.
Successful implant
Successful implant
Clinically:
Immobile.
Successful implant
Radio-graphically :
No peri-implant radiolucency.
3.
4.
Fixed bridge
Implant
Cont
Fixed partial dentures
Preservation of bone.
loss of teeth
Lack of stimulation to the residual bone
Decrease in bone density, height and width.
Cont
Cont
1.
2.
3.
Cont
Cont
Resistance to disease.
Implants are resistant to caries, natural teeth
are not.
Cont
Increased confidence.
Conclusions
Amazing implants
Outline
Cont
Preservation of bone.
Retrievability.
Resistance to disease.
Increased confidence.
Conclusions
References.
2.
3.
Cont
1.
2.
3.
Advancement of technical
procedures (CADCAM).
Many training courses are
offered by universities,
professional societies and
implant manufacturers.
Profitable.
Successful implant
Successful Osseointegration.
Successful implant
Successful implant
Clinically:
Immobile.
Successful implant
Radio-graphically :
No peri-implant radiolucency.
3.
4.
Fixed bridge
Implant
Cont
Fixed partial dentures
Preservation of bone.
loss of teeth
Lack of stimulation to the residual bone
Decrease in bone density, height and width.
Cont
Cont
1.
2.
3.
Cont
Cont
Resistance to disease.
Implants are resistant to caries, natural teeth
are not.
Cont
Increased confidence.
Conclusions
Amazing implants