Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

ACTIVITY BASED COSTING

MANUFACTURING SECTOR

INTRODUCTION

In Manufacturing three types of costs


are included:
1.

Material Cost (Direct Cost)

2.

Labor Cost (Direct Cost)

3.

Manufacturing Cost (Overhead Cost)

Direct cost are chargeable to end


product without any difficulty

Indirect cost creates problems in


determining the accurate product cost

FLOW OF MANUFACTURING COST

APPROACH

Indirect cost can be allocated and apportioned by any of the


following two approaches:
1.

Traditional approach

2.

Activity Based Costing approach

COMPARISON
Traditional approach

RESOURCE
COSTS

Directly
traced or
allocated
Cost Pools:
Plants or
Departments
Predetermin
ed
Cost
overhead
Objective
rate

ABC approach

RESOURCE
COSTS

Cost Pools:
Activities or
Activities
centers

Cost
Objective

Directly
traced or
allocated

Cost driver
rates for
each
activity

Shift from Traditional to ABC approach

Since traditional costing uses average overhead rate for all activities it
lead to under costing of certain product and over costing of other products

Need to measure more accurately how different products or services use


company resources has led to more refined costing system know as ABC

ABC is:

Accurate and reliable


Better pricing decision
Realistic
Control of cost
Greater cost efficiency

PROBLEM
Major Ltd. manufactures two products A and B. The product A is a low-volume
item and its sales are 5000 units p.a. The product B is a high volume item and
its sales are 20000 units p.a. Both products require two direct labor hours for
completion. The company works 50000 direct labor hours each year as given
below:
Hours
Product A: 5000 units x2
hours

10000

Product B: 20000 units x 2


hours

40000

Total Hours

50000

PROBLEM
Details of costs for material and labor for each product (per unit) are given
below:
Product

Direct Material

Rs. 25

Rs. 15

Direct Labor (@ Rs 5 per


hour)

10

10

The companys total manufacturing overheads cost are Rs 8,75,000 per annum.
The company has analyzed its operations and has determined that five activities
act as cost drivers in the incurrence of overhead costs. Data relating to the five
activities are as follows:

PROBLEM
Activity

Traceabl
e Cost
(in Rs.)

Total

Product A

Product B

Machine Set up

2,30,000

5,000

3,000

2,000

Quality
Inspection

1,60,000

8,000

5,000

3,000

Production
Order

81,000

600

200

400

3,14,000

40,000

12,000

28,000

90,000

750

150

600

Machine hours
worked
Material
receipts

SOLUTION

Traditional Method
Produc
tA

Product B

Units
Produced

5000

20000

Overhead
Absorption rate:

Direct
Material

25

15

Direct Labor

10

10

8,75,000
50,000 labor
hrs.

Prime Cost

35

35

Over Head

35

35

Product
Cost

70

60

=17.5 per labor


hrs.

SOLUTION

Overhead calculation for ABC


Activity

Total Cost
apportione
d (per
unit)

Product A

Product B

Machine Set up

46

1,38,000

92,000

Quality Inspection

20

1,00,000

60,000

135

27,000

54,000

7.85

94,200

2,19,800

120

18,000

72,000

3,77,200

4,97,800

5000

20000

75.44

24.89

Production Order
Machine hours
worked
Material receipts
Total
Units Produced
Over Head Cost

SOLUTION

ABC Method
Produc
tA

Product B

Direct
Material

25

15

Direct Labor

10

10

Prime Cost

35

35

Over Head

75.44

24.89

Product
Cost

110.44

49.89

SUMMARY
COST OF PRODUCTION PER UNIT
Product A

Product B

Traditional Method

70

60

ABC Method

110.44

49.89

Statements of cost prepared under traditional method and ABC method


produces different results. Under traditional method Product A does not
cheaper then compared to in ABC method, where as Product B appears more
costly compared to latter method. As ABC approach is considered more
logical, it may be presumed that results produced by ABC are more accurate.
If selling price is fixed on the basis of cost, product A would be priced lower
and Product B will be priced higher in traditional approach. This will lead to
loss of sale of product B and loss of per unit of product A, leading to a loss to
the company

THANK YOU

You might also like