Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bioethics and Professionalism in Medical - Care, Education, Research For The 21st Century 15 Agustus 2016
Bioethics and Professionalism in Medical - Care, Education, Research For The 21st Century 15 Agustus 2016
Bioethics and Professionalism in Medical - Care, Education, Research For The 21st Century 15 Agustus 2016
IN MEDICAL
Care, Education, Research
for the 21st Century
Resolving Ethical Dillemma
Soenarto Sastrowijoto
Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities
Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada
Yogyakarta, 2016
KASUS (THT-KL)
Seorang pasien dengan mastoiditis kronis yang
memungkinkan dilakukan operasi mastoidektomi
sekaligus rekontruksi telinga tengah, atau pasien yang
lain dengan kanker nasopharing yang kalo diberikan
kemoterapi dan radioterapi hasilnya akan menjanjikan,
namun kedua pasien tersebut menolak karena
jaminan asuransinya tidak mencukupi .
Keadaan-keadaan ini akan membuat dokter dan pasien
menghadapi kesukaran
Hippocrates : To help and do no harm
I.
INTRODUCTION
2.
3.
UNESCO (2008)
Bioethics Core Curriculum eg. Syllabus Ethics Education Programme
5.
Generation
20
Informative
Curriculum
Learning
Information/ lecture
Practice
Examination
EXPERT
II
Formative
Curriculum
Learning
Idem I
Values
Innovative/ PBL
PROFFESIONAL
III
Transformative
Curriculum
Learning
Idem II
Leadership
Management
New sense of bioethics
AGENT OF CHANGE
New
Transformative
21
IV
Reformation
Objective/ Process
Output
II.
SOME CLARIFICATION
1. Ethics:
A study of general nature of moral choice to be made by a person; moral
philosophy.
Ethical principles (Belmont Reports, 1979 USA)
1)Respect for person
2)Beneficene
3)Justice
2. Bioemedical Ethics (Beauchamp and Childress 1979)
1)Respect for autonomy
2)Non maleficence
3)Beneficence
4)Justice
3.
Bioethics
1) Bioethics is a new discipline which combines biological
knowledge and human values system, bridge between the
science and the humanities, help humanities to survive and
sustain, and improve the civilized world.
(Potter, 1971)
2) Bioethics
The study of ethical and moral implication of new biological
discoveries and biomedical advances as in the field of genetic
engineering and drug research
(Soukhanov et al, 1996)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Climate change
Trafficking
Child labour
Scarce resources
To buy a body part
Immigration
etc
7)
Professional Behavior
Declaration of
Independence (4
July 1776) USA
-Freedom/Liberty
-Human Right
- Autonomy
Manifesto
Communist (1847)
USSR
Pancasila
(1 June1945)
INDONESIA
-Historis-materialism
-Proletarianism
-Marxism
-Communism
Rukun Negara
Semaul Undong
Confucianism
Hinduism
Buddhism
Taoism
Shintoism
Christian
Islamism,
-Individualism
-Liberalism
-Capitalism
-Colonialism
-Imperialism
Professional
Behavior
Professional
Behavior
Professional
Behavior
4.
1).
Mono
Multi
Inter
Trans
5.
III.
1.
PROFESSIONALISM
In 2009, School of Medicine, UGM arranged a workshop
professionalism to develop the CORE components/ attributes of
professionalism and the challenges that have to be avoided. The
result could be learned from following table (Fig. 3)
Professionalism
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
Challenges
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
Abuse of power
Breach confidentiality
Arrogance & greedy
Conflict of interest
Lying & Fraud
Discrimination
Etc
2.
3.
IV.
1.
1)
Clinical Ethics (Forrow et al, 1999), some principles in medical care should be
conducted:
a.
Fundamental Principles:
A clinical intervention is justified if and only if the expected benefits outweight the
expected burdens from the perspective of patient.
b.
Share decision making:
a). Paternalistic, b) complete patient autonomy, or c) share decision making.
c.
Rules/ medico legal perspective:
Competent or incompetent patients or surrogate decision maker (parent,
community leader, local regulation/ tradition)
d.
Some cases and judicial guidance:
DNR/ hydration, ECT/ antipsychotic medicine, Jehovahs winesses, and living
will.
e.
Keep in mind:
That good decision requires good data seek win-win solution and
be creative think about who should decide as well as what decision
is the best.
f.
Question:
On what are the important:
. Fact (history, diagnosis, interventions, family/ patient choice)
. Values (patient/ family, team, institutions, third parties, etc);
conflicts (what values?) possible courses of aaction; decision
and justifications (compare, choose, improve that choice)
. Further reflection (preventive ethics)
g. Ethical disagreement:
about fact, values, follow up, and where decision authority lies.
h. Preventive ethics:
with establish a trust worthy partnership with patient/ family; and
communicate early, often and realistic about goals and endpoint.
i. Some cases:
informed consent, end of life issues, physician assisted dying, organ
donation, truth telling, confidentiality, interaction with peers,
disability, interaction with supervisor, conflict of interest mistake/
error/ malpractive, sex/ abortion, gift, language differences, money/
managed care, etc
2)
1. Diagnosis
2. Treatment
3. Prognosis
1. Before
2. During
3. After
MEDICAL INDICATION
QUALITY OF LIFE
CONTEXTUAL FEATURES
1. Patient
2. Family
3. Team
1. Support system
2. Cost availability
3. Special
circumstance
Terminally Ill
(< 6 months to life)
Patients Treatment
1
STOP
Futile
CONTINUED
Aggresive
(Fig 5)
1. Questions
. What level of statistical/ experience
evidence to support futility?
. Who dicide wether an intervention is
futile, physician or patient?
. What process should be used to
disagreement, between patient/
surrogate and clinical team?
2. Questions
. The success of treatment (1 3
6)%? Should be continued?
. The contextual features, too high
price, minimal benefit, will be
continued?
. What level of EBP to support
aggressive treatment
1. Cost
2. Accesst to medical
Insurance
Gov or Private
Congress (USA)
(DPR)
Court
Content competent
Pedagogical competent
Dealing with sensitive topic
Student development
Dual relationship
Confidentiality
Respect for colleagues
Valid assessment for students
Respect for institution
(Murray et al, 1996).
Curriculum
Design
Student
Selection
Teaching Learning
Methods
Role
Modeling
2
9
4
0
1
9
Assessment
Methods
3
7
Conclusion:
1) No single instrument for measuring of all aspects of professionalism.
2) The important of multidimensional approach summative and formative
assessment, in the curriculum
3) Different clinical setting, may use different assessment methods should
be chosen appropriately.
2.
3.
4.
10 11
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Lecture
Tutorial
Lab. Works
Field work
Self directed
learning
6. Campus
environment
Basic ME
Undergraduate
(Blocks)
Graduate/ clinical
rotation
Postgraduate
Master/ Doctorate
Specialist/ Sub
Specialist
CPD
(SoenartoSastrowijoto, 2006)
A
Quality development
Basic standard
Under standard
A: Affective/ Attitude
S: Skills
K: Knowledge
OUT PUT
(Standards)
PROCESS
(Fig. 10)
TEACHER/LECTURER
TEACH
CONTENT
MATERIAL
STUDENT
TEACHING
METHODS:
LECTURE
SMALL GROUP
DISCUSSION
CASES BASED
ETC
KNOWLEDG
E OF
MEDICAL
ETHICS
APPLICATION
OF MEDICAL
ETHICS
FORMATIVE
ASSESMENT
SUMMATIVE
ASSESMENT
OUTPUT
(Fig. 11)
TUTORIAL TOOL
(Fig. 12)
TUTORIAL TOOL
(Fig. 13)
SINCERE
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
CANT BE ASSESED YET IN UNDERGADUATE, SHOULD BE ASSES
LATER IN NEXT GRADES
INTEGRITY
CANT BE ASSESED YET IN UNDERGADUATE, SHOULD BE ASSES
LATER IN NEXT GRADES
NOBLE
ALTRUIST
SHOW
THEIR
2.
In carrying out a clinical trials and translational research, physicianresearcher has to fairly treat the patients/research participants and
the sponsors. Various issues in collaborative clinical trials and
translational research with industries (pharmaceutical and others)
and universities or research institutions: the owner of specimen,
data equipments, intellectual property rights; MTA: authorships;
royalties; etc. All should be agreed before the studies will be started,
based on the idea of the New Sense of Bioethics (Sastrowijoto S,
2012)
3.
Abad - 20:
Ilmuwan-ilmuwan Dasar (Biomedical Scientists) dan tokoh-tokoh
laboratorium memandang rendah (scorn) kegiatan-kegiatan
klinik adalah tidak ilmiah.
Para klinisi menolak penelitian-penelitian laboratorik tidak praktis,
tidak cocok dengan kondisi-kondisi klinis.
Mereka lupa bahwa bidang kegiatan (domain) mereka adalah
bagian dari natural science human life (Freinstein AR, 1967;
Schuster, 2005; Toesteson et al, 1994); Sastrowijoto, 2011).
Translational research
Clinical trials
Transdisciplinary attitude
In Clinical Trials:
Physician researchers have to serve two masters, the need and
demand of patients/ families and interest of the sponsors (ABCFG).
The quality and standards of clinical research should be seriously
considered:
1) Ethical and regulatory aspects of health research: Scandals and
tragedies on medical/ health research; involving human and
animal participants; Certain population: women, children, captive
population (students, soldiers, prisoners, impairments, etc);
Genetics and stem cell studies, biobank, stored materials.
2) Collaborative studies: interceters, intercountries regional and
international, with varies agreements: MTA; owners of specimen
stored materials; data; equipment; products; intellectual
property rights, sharing benefits, sharing publications,
marketing of products all have to be agreed before the study
will be started.
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
Informed consent,
Scientific misconduct,
Conflicts of interest,
DMC, DSMB, and or CIC development,
Research participants selection & recruitment,
Research involving human, animal, plants, and mirobes,
Writing report,
Ethics in clinical trials, their rights and autonomy,
Conflicts of interest in ABCFG partnership.
Clinical Research
Lab Oriented
Research
Invitro Studies
Animal Physio/
Anthology
Disease Oriented
Research
Patient Oriented
Research
Human Physio/
Pathology
Dx/ Rx Disease
Translational
Research
Clinical Trials
Population Oriented
Research
Epidemiology
Behavioral Studies
Outcome/ HSR
Clinical Practice
(Fig. 15) Interaction and interrelationships among clinical research, basic research
and clinical practice activities, diagnostic, and therapeutic studies: A Health Services
Research (HSR) (Shuster, 2005; Ludbrook, et all, 2005)
59
ABCFG PARTNERSHIP
Collaborations/ Partnership
National, regional, global; institutional
Inter centers/Inter countries/Trans center
A B C F G partnership
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
AUTHORSHIPS
Who will be included in authorship? Who will be PI and Co Pis?
Student could be as PI?
The word author is dirived from the Latin word auctor,
meaning creator, originato. The word authority comes from
the same root. In more mordern thinking, the term intelectual
property is a central issue.
In discussing who is or are the author(s) and contributor(s), we
are better to difine the role of authors and contributors. (ICJME,
2015, International Committee on Medical Journal Editors)
All those designated as author should meet all four criteria for
authorship, those who do not meet all four criteria should be
acknowledged.
All people named as authors meet all four criterias, and it is
not the role of journal editors todetermine who qualifies or
does not quality for authorship.
If agreement cannot be reached about who qualifies for
authorship, the institution(s) where the work was performed,
not journal editor, should be asked to investigate.
VIOLATIONS
ETHICS
Ethics
Biomedical
Ethics
Bioethics
Global
Bioethics
New Sense of
Bioethics
PROFESSIONALISM
Cognitive
Phychomot
or
Affective
LEGAL
Guidline
Regulations
Acts
BPJS Act 24; 2011
JKN Act 40; 2004
SUMMARY/ ABSTRACT
Professionalism of an institution such as School of Medicine have to be improved
continuously through the improvement of each individual person (students,
resident, administrative staff and faculty members), for the 21 st Century. The role of
Bioethics and HELP (Humanities, Ethics, Law and Professionalism) in medical
health service, research and education as an important and compulsory part
concept that have to be implemented at each institution.
Partnership among disciplines in health (medicine, nursing, nutrition, and the allied
health disciplines) should be developed based on the new tolerance on
transdisciplinary attitude is an assential part of partnership.
Various issues of professionalism should be discussed seriously, and in the School
of Medicine will be supported by Professional Behavior Committee of the schools.
Institutional, national, regional, and international ABCFG-Partnership based on the
new spirit of New Sense of Bioethics should be improved
V.
REFERENCES
AAMC and NBME, 2002. Embedding Professionalism in Medical Education;
Assessment as a Tool for Implementation. Report from an Invitational Conference,
Baltimore, Maryland. May 15-17
Angell M, 2003 Ethical Imperialism? Ethics in International Collaborative Clinical
Research, Reading and Commentary Edited by Emanuel Ej.et al. The John
Hopkins Univ. Press. Pp 563-567
Beauchamp T.L. and Childress J.F, 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Fifth Ed.
Oxford University Press. Inc.
Belmont Report, 1979
Boelen C, 1996. The Five Star Doctor: An Asset to Health Care Reform? WHO,
Geneva, Switzerland.
Callahan D, 1999. The Hasting Center and the Early Years of Bioethics. Kennedy
Institute of Ethics Journal, 9(1): 53-71
Sastrowijoto S, 2011. The New Sense of Global Bioethics: Local/ National Wisdoms
Contribution to the Applied Medical Ethics Principles The 12th ABC Conference Sept
28-Oct 2, Taipei.
Schuster, DP, 2005. The Value of Translational and Experimental Clinical Research.
Introduction: Translational and Experimental Clinical Research. Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins. Baltimore p XVII
SoenartoSastrowijoto and Mahardinata NA, 2006. Teaching and Learning Bioethics
in Higher Education: UGM Experience (Medicine). The 8th World Conference on
Bioethics, Beijing 2-9 August.
SoenartoSastrowijoto, 2012. Bioethics in Clinical Trials/ Translational Research in
the Global Era.Symposium on Translational Research.School of Medicine
Universitas Indonesia Jakarta.
Soukhanov HA et al, 1996. The American Heritage Dictionary of English LanguageThird Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, New York
Toesteson DC, Adelstem SJ and Carver AS, 1994. New Pathway to Medical
Education, Learning to Learn at Harvard Medical School. Harvard Univ. Press, MA.