Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Econ 03
Econ 03
1.Buy 8 low-end workstations at $2 000 each. Give two drafters 1 years notice.
At the end of the year they each get $5 000 severance pay. Train the
remaining eight in AutoCAD. The first training course is available in a year,
and costs $2 000 per participant. After completing the course, each drafter
gets a $100/week raise.
2.Buy 5 high-end workstations at $5 000 each. All the drafters get a years notice
and $5 000 severance pay at the end of the year. Five new graduates are hired at
$1 200 per week. They are trained in Pro-Engineer; to keep current, they will
each need a $5 000 retraining session every six months.
3.Do nothing.
Any of these options would allow the company to service its current
customers. Any money saved can be invested at 10%, which is also the
cost of borrowing money. What should they do?
A drafting company employs 10 drafters at $800/week each. The CEO considers three alternatives:
1.Buy 8 low-end workstations at $2 000 each. Give two drafters 1 years notice. At the end of the year they each get
$5 000 severance pay. Train the remaining eight in AutoCAD. The first training course is available in a year, and
costs $2 000 per participant. After completing the course, each drafter gets a $100/week raise.
2. Buy 5 high-end workstations at $5 000 each. All the drafters get a years notice and $5 000 severance pay at the
end of the year. Five new graduates are hired at $1 200 per week. They are trained in Pro-Engineer; to keep current,
they will need a $5 000 retraining session every six months.
3. Do nothing.
Any of these options would allow the company to service its current customers. Any money saved can be
invested at 10%, which is also the cost of borrowing money. What should they do?
$40,000
$10 000
P=F(P/F,i,1)
$16 000
$10 000
PW = -16,000 - .
$40,000
26,000(P/F,i,1
)
PW = -16,000 26,000(P/F,i,1)
P=40,000(P/A,i,4)
$40,000
P
PW = -16,000 26,000(P/F,i,1) +
P=F(P/F,i,1)
P=40,000(P/A,i,4)
PW = -16,000 26,000(P/F,i,1) +
P=40,000(P/A,i,4)(P/F,i,1)
$25 000
$50,000
$50 000
PW ($000) = - 25
$100 000
P=F(P/F,i,1)
$50,000
$50 000
PW ($000) = - 25
$100 000
$50,000
50,000(P/F,i,1)
PW ($000) = - 25 50(P/F,i,1)
$50 000
PW ($000) = - 25 50(P/F,i,1) +
P=50,000(P/A,i,4)
$50 000
PW ($000) = - 25 50(P/F,i,1) +
P=50,000(P/A,i,4)(P/F,i,1)
PW ($000) = - 25 50(P/F,i,1) +
P=50,000(P/A,i,4)(P/F,i,1)
A = G(A/G,i,N)
G
4G
3G
2G
A=G(A/G,i,N)
A
P=A(P/A,i,N)
A
3. You get a regular salary and a $100 raise every year
(or a $100 cut every year)
A = A/ + G(A/G,i,N)
Sample problem: I get to choose between a job in industry
with a starting salary of $50,000 and $5,000 raises every
year.
And if i = g, P =NA/(1+g)
Sample problem: I get to choose between a job
in industry with a starting salary of $50,000 and
5% raises every year
b)Use j = (1+ i)4 1 to get a quadrennial interest rate, then use (P/A, j, N
c)Use (A/F, i, 4) to turn the first payment to an annuity, then use (P/A,i,N)
Comparing projects based on Annual
Worth
If most of our cash flows are annual, its easier to convert one-time
expenses to their annual equivalent.
Also, you may want to know ``How much will I have to spend a
week? rather than ``What is the present worth of my annual salary?
Comparing projects on this basis will always give the same result as
comparison based on present worth or future worth.
Example
A company wants to expand its capacity. It is considering two alternatives:
Assume an interest rate of 15%. Compare the annual cost of the two altern
Summary of comparison methods we know so far:
Present worth
Future worth
Annual worth
Still to come:
Rate of return
Cost/benefit
Payback period
Comparing Alternatives
In comparing alternatives, any cost common to all the alternatives
can be ignored.
http://www.sfu.ca/~jones/ENSC201/index.html