Integrating Triad of Learning in

ent-Teachers Enhancement Prog

As a Tool
or Reviewing Human Developmen
to 4 year Student-Teachers of
th

Columban College
 Objectives
The research aims to maintain and sustain
retention of knowledge among students
through the triad of learning among which
can greatly contribute to strengthen the
foundation of their knowledge as they
prepare themselves for the LET and the
field of teaching through the Student-
Teachers Enhancement Program.
 Assumptions
The following assumptions are made:
1. Mastery of the Professional Education
subjects is an essential factor to pass the LET
and to become an effective and efficient
educator.
2. Regular review programs prevent
knowledge lost and promote retention of
learnings.
3. Utilization of technology in enhancement
review programs will be of great help in all
levels.
Research Questions
How can ATP help the college in preparing the
student-teachers for the Licensure Exam?
What can the students and the institution do to
improve the weaknesses of the student-teachers
revealed in the result of the ATP?
Does the triad of learning of the STEP improved
the students-teachers weakness?
What is the impact of the triad of learning to the
student-teachers?
Are refresher programs like STEP can be helpful
to the institution as they prepare every student-
teachers for the LET and the field?
Conceptual Framework
P
Uncontrolled P Interventions
O
Variable R (Triad of Learning)
S
E
T
-
T
T
E
E
S
T
S
Controlled T
Variable

Figure 1. Conceptual Framework

RESPONDENTS
Intervention
Documentation
 CONCLUSION
Based on the findings obtained in the study, the
researchers concluded that:
Assessment for Teaching Potential which revealed
the strengths and weaknesses of each student
teachers. It can be used as a basis or tool for
developing a review program. It will improve their
weaknesses and boost their strengths as they
prepare themselves to the challenging Licensure
Examination as well as in the actual field of teaching.
It is very important for every educational institution
to provide programs which enhance the skills of
every student teachers. As stated in the Code of
Ethics for Professional Teachers Article 1 Section 1.
 CONCLUSION

The systematic process of the triad of learning

greatly contributed in enhancing the weakness
of the student teachers and in relearning things.
The triad of learning also improved
communication skill of the student-teachers as
well as their relationship with each other.
 CONCLUSION

Programs like Student Teachers Enhancement

Program provides opportunity to both student
teachers and graduates of education to relearn
their weak points at their own convenience. For
students, this could be of great help if they want
to have an advanced learning or if they have
certain confusions or queries to a certain topic
yet they dont have guts to ask their teachers.
For graduates, this can be a way of reviewing in
preparation to the LET
 Recommendation
Based on the findings obtained in the study, the
researchers offered the following recommendations
to wit:
The institution must use assessments like ATP to
monitor the progress of every student-teachers:
the strengths and weaknesses. Which can help
them to formulate appropriate review programs.
The College of education must require every
Department to conduct relearning programs or
reviews with regards to their area of specialization.
 Recommendation
The triad of learning can be used as mode of
review programs for every students as well as a
teaching strategy.
Teachers can make use of the triad of learning in
improving communication skill of every learner.
The institution must have annual review and
seminar for all levels to maintain and sustain the
knowledge of every student teachers in all
subjects.
Summary of ATP Result
Human Development

23

10
8

0 0
1
Superior Above Average High Average Average Low Average Below Average
Summary of ATP Result
Facilitating Learning
20
18
18

16
14
14

12
10
10

0
0
Superior Above Average High Average Average 0
Low Average 0
Below Average
Summary of ATP Result
Practice Teaching
18
17
16
16

14

12

10

6
5

2 2
2

0
Superior
0 Above Average High Average Average Low Average Below Average
Summary of ATP Result
Assessment of Learning

19

13

5
4

1 0
Superior Above Average High Average Average Low Average Below Average
 Pre-test and Posttest
Pre-test and Posttest Result

99 90 100
99
92 86 89 91
96 90 81 86
89 92 78 74
65 77
77 74 75 67
42 48 51 48 54 58 58
41 28 27 32 31 40
24

PRE- TEST POST TEST

mean Mean Difference Standard Deviation St Difference

Pre-Test 48. 64 38.83 16.84 13.44

Posttest 87.44 9.388
 Pre-test and Posttest
Pre-test and Posttest Result

45
21. Liavi, Ann
43

28
20. Borja, Chrisha
31

24
19. Llavore, Nio Jearonnie
27

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

mean Mean difference Standard Deviation St Difference

Pre-Test 33.67 -1.33 8.33 2. 89

Posttest 32.33 11.15

 Evaluation
COMMENTS

Keep it up! dayang

The intervention done by the researchers was good.

The content of the module help me a lot for incoming Licensure

Examination for Teachers.

Good Job!

Thank You!

Good Job and Good Bless! KEEP IT UP!

Good Job!

Job Well Done! Tunay na nakatulong ang ginawang intervention para

sa aming graduating students na magtetake ng board exam this

coming October. Maraming Salamat!

Thank You
&
God Bless!
 Pre-Test
PRE- TEST
90
80 77 74 75
70 67
58 58
60 54
48 51 48
50 43
41 42 40
40 32 31
28 27 31
30 24 27
20
10
0