This document discusses key ethical issues in emergency medicine. It begins by outlining differences between emergency and primary care practices. Namely, emergency patients do not choose their physician and decisions must be made quickly. It then examines ethical issues like informed consent, patient decision-making capacity, and limiting resuscitation. Throughout, it provides examples and considerations for evaluating and managing these issues in the emergency setting.
This document discusses key ethical issues in emergency medicine. It begins by outlining differences between emergency and primary care practices. Namely, emergency patients do not choose their physician and decisions must be made quickly. It then examines ethical issues like informed consent, patient decision-making capacity, and limiting resuscitation. Throughout, it provides examples and considerations for evaluating and managing these issues in the emergency setting.
This document discusses key ethical issues in emergency medicine. It begins by outlining differences between emergency and primary care practices. Namely, emergency patients do not choose their physician and decisions must be made quickly. It then examines ethical issues like informed consent, patient decision-making capacity, and limiting resuscitation. Throughout, it provides examples and considerations for evaluating and managing these issues in the emergency setting.
(Bioethics) Department of Bioethics School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Differences between Emergency and Primary Care Practice (Iserson, 2004) Emergency Practice Primary Care Practice Brought in by ambulance, police, etc. Patients choice to enter service Patient does not choose physician Patient chooses physician (?) ED personnel do not know patient Often know patient+values Patient experiences acute change Patient has chronic medical problems Anxiety, pain, alcohol and altered mental Less frequent status are frequent Decisions are made quickly Time for discussion+ deliberation Decisions made independently Greater opportunity to consult Physician represents institution Represents self or medical group Environment open + less controlled Work environment private+controlled Stressful work schedule Schedule often set 2 Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013 Emergency patients rely heavily on the interpersonal skills, moral behavior, emotional maturity, goodwill, and ethical capacity of emergency providers. (Larkin, 1999)
3 Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013
Ethical issues related to emergency medicine:
1. Informed Consent and Refusal
2. Patient Decision Making Capacity 3. Treatment of Minors 4. Advance Directives 5. Limiting Resuscitation 6. Futility 7. Confidentiality 8. Truth Telling and Communication 9. Compassion and Empathy 10.Moral Issues in Disaster Medicine 4 Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013 1. Informed consent & refusal The Emergency Rule 1. Patient unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting exception to informed consent
2. Limited time emergency services
operate under the moral imperative of beneficence, acting in the best interests of the patient.
3. In time of life threatening crisis
physician's duty to do that which 5 the occasion demands, even Blok ECCE 2 without 24/05/2013 How urgent?
How urgent a situation is
depends upon: - consequences of a delay in giving treatment, or - consequences of a failure to give any treatment at all.
6 Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013
Refusal 1. Patients with decision making capacity (capacity) have a right not to consent to care.
2. The elements of a valid, informed
refusal are the same as consent: capacity & comprehension of information (risks & harm)
3. Refusal of care may conflict with
physicians judgment & 7 Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013 recommendation emphasize the 4. Both consent and refusal must be made voluntary, without coercion/duress.
5. Physicians should provide
treatment despite: - a verbal refusal in patients with no capacity, or - life threat is so acute no time to assess refusal.
6. When patients do not have capacity
8 Blok benefit ECCE 2 must outweigh24/05/2013 the 2. Patient Decision Making Capacity Define decision making capacity Contrast medical interpretations of decision making capacity with the legal definition of competence List the ways decisions can be made when a patient lacks decision-making capacity 9 Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013 The Medical Concept of Decision Making Capacity All adult patients unless there is evidence obtained by history, behavior, or physical examination The determination of decision making capacity requires that: 1. The patient appreciates he/she has the power to make decisions on his/her behalf 2. The patient understands - the medical situation & prognosis, - the nature of the recommended evaluation or care, - the alternatives, - the risks & benefits of each, and 10 - Blok the likely ECCE 2 consequences 24/05/2013 3. The patient's decision is stable over time, Level of capacity
The degree/level of decision-making
capacity varies with the degree & probability of risk, benefit, & patient's decision to consent/refuse.
The greater the risk the more
exacting the standard of capacity A patient might need a low level of capacity to consent to a procedure 11 with Blok ECCE 2 substantial benefits 24/05/2013 and The Concept of Legal Competence?
Each state may have slightly
different criteria for the determination of competence How about Indonesia??
12 Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013
When a Patient Lacks Decision-Making Capacity
How should medical decisions be
made? depends on: - the speed with which the decision must be made - what information about patient preferences is available
When patients previously
13 expressed wishes are known, Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013 Case Study: 60 y.o. referred from private hospital with (suspect of) CRF (7 days of hospitalization, askeskin) Arrived in E.R. unconscious (somnolen, GCS 12), suspect of metabolic disorder Latest lab results reveal normal, doctors advise head CT-scan to find etiology & establish diagnosis Wife disagrees (wishes for 14 homecare) Blok ECCE 2 but children agrees 24/05/2013 to 3. Limiting Resuscitation "Do Not Resuscitate Order" (DNR order) Withholding & withdrawing: no moral difference Legally+ethically acceptable to withhold resuscitation attempts on patients who have expressed clear wishes (Indonesia?) Challenge communication must be legally, ethically, and medically 15 sound Blok ECCE 2 (ex: form with patient & 24/05/2013 Emergency setting patient's wishes, medical condition, and prognosis are usually unknown.
If there is doubt resuscitative
efforts should be initiated.
The decision to resuscitate must be
an immediate yes or no decision.
"Slow codes," suboptimal effort, or
delayed intervention are never medically or ethically acceptable. 16 Blok ECCE 2 24/05/2013 Reference Larkin GL. Evaluating Professionalism in Emergency Medicine: Clinical Ethical Competence. Academic Emergency Medicine ,1999; 6:302-11 Rucoba, RJ. Ethical, legal concerns for emergency medical care. AAP News, 25 July 2011 SAEM Ethics Committee Ethics Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residencies,1994 Iserson KV. Ethical Considerations in Emergency Care. Israeli Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2004; 4: 10-17 Pauls M et al. Ethics in the trenches: Part 2. Case studies of ethical challenges in emergency medicine. Can J Emerg Med, 2004;6(5):363-6 Marco CA et al. Ethics Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Graduate Medical Education. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010; pp. 17 17 Franklin Blok ECCE 2JS et al. Ethical Dilemmas in Emergency 24/05/2013Medicine. Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, 2008; 12-14