Evaluation of My 1st Eportfolio by Venla Varis at IntCultNet Project Prague Conf. in 2004 Collecting Milestones Re. Building My International PLE

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

Evaluating a student’s

portfolio – a case
example
2
SUCCESS OR FAILURE ON AN INTERNATIONAL
ASSIGNMENT

DEALING WITH CHANGE & LIFE LONG LEARNING


Withdrawal/Avoidance of Change vs Will to Change/Seek Adventures
SOCIO-CULTURAL COLLABORATION
Isolation vs Participation
PERSONAL PRESENCE
Passivity /Caution vs Initiative/Energy
POSITION ON AUTHORITY
Power/Authority is Assigned vs Power /Authority is Earned
INNER COHERENCE & INTEGRITY
Inner conflict/ fear/ hopeless vs Inner peace/ self-esteem/ hope

Daniel Kealey, 2000


3
The functions of the portfolios are to:

• Encourage for self-directed acting

• Empower creative thinking

• Facilitate learning of self-reflection and self-


assessment

• Facilitate improving your personal contribution to


teamwork

• Enhance problem solving and proactive behavior

• Improve changing and transformative learning

• Anticipate future learning needs and development


4

CULTURE
IS A CONTINUOUS INTERACTION
BETWEEN THE IDEAS OF OUR HEADS
AND OUR ACTUAL BEHAVIOUR -
WITHIN OUR CULTURE WE DO
WHAT WE DO BECAUSE
IT IS ” THE RIGHT OR NORMAL” WAY
TO DO THINGS

© Jaakko Lehtonen
5
SELF - MANAGEMENT
Relationship strategies: How a learner enhance
communication and resolve conflicts ?
A learner’s:
 power to see the situation
 motivation and fear
 perspectives; things (what and why) people (who and
how)
 managing self, people, process and performance
 “opportunities” and points of view on:
- rules, standards, competition, working alone or with team,
- problems, chaos, praise, helping others,
- decision making, change, responsibility, process, etc.
© Mlp, DiSc-tool, Venla Varis
6
Collaborative learning

 Orientation to collaborate
 Display of respect
 Empathy and Sensitivity
 Interaction management
 Task role behaviour
 Relational role behaviour
 Tolerance for ambiguity
 Interaction posture others
7
1. Orientation to collaborate
How did Ievo explain herself and world around her ?

• She was “principal center” on the level interdependent.

• She wrote very openly 65 lines with confidence. It was


easy to her to her private self to the co-learners.

• She saw her learning as her life using right side of brain
=wisdom.
• She understood and explained how the various tasks
and principals apply and relate to each others and her
earlier experience

• She showed power or capacity to act. She had vital


energy to make choices and decisions even overcome
deeply embedded habits

• She did realistic self-inquiry using material and self-


assessment tools
V. Varis 2004
- (What was her motivation?)
2. Display of respect 8

How did Ievo show positive regard for other


learners, tutors etc. ?

• Her lifestyle was proactive, seeking to motivate and serve


others.

• She explained her life experiences in the terms of opportunities


for learning and contribution.

• Her respect attitudes (points 27 from 28) she validated it in her


own life.

• She “listened” by appreciative, comprehensive, discerning,


evaluative or other non-judgmental way
© VenlaVaris 2004
3. Empathy and Sensitivity 9

How did Ievo understand others’ feelings ?

• She tried to understand others at first ( not to be


understood herself at first) = Inter-depending level

• She was listening (reading) others with intent to


understand (instead ignoring, pretending, selective or
attentive).

• It was not so easy to her to understand co-learners’


feelings and moods

• She did not practice very deeply of tactful and


respectful sensitivity

• She wanted the co-learners to do their part.


( What was her fear ?)
©Venla Varis
10
4. Interaction management

How did Ievo show key qualification of socio-


cultural know how?

• She values differences by looking for synergy and


public victory

• She is positive and creative

• Her basic coping skills are; communication,


problem solving, flexibility and satisfaction

• She was not a learner that co-learners use to ask


advices from her

©Venla Varis
11
5. Tolerance for ambiguity

What were Ievo’s reactions in new and


ambiguous situations ( quality and quantity of
discomfort) ? .

• She has a strong need to take charge

• She likes to thrive on the demanding learning

• She has will to help others

• She has motivation to develop solutions

©Venla Varis
12
6. Task role behaviour

How did Ievo innovate and create ideas and


solve problems in team?

• She used to adapt well

• She utilized previous competence to new


challenges

• She was motivated to see clear visual images in her


mind

• She did not have problem to complete her


©Venla Varis
study tasks
13
7. Relational role behaviour
• She looked for opportunities to help and contribute

• She was one unique, talented, creative individual in the


midst of many co-learners.

• She works independently and interdependently and can


accomplish many things.

• Her security was a function of the social mirror.

• She was willing to know and understand the opinion of


others = Proactive behaviour.

• She tried to couch and innovate co-learners

 Her team member role was;


Member, Thinker, Jugler, Closer
©Venla Varis
14
8. Emotional Competence

• She showed awareness of own feelings, self-discipline, flexibility,


innovativeness.
• She was motivated to discover many emotional hints
and understand first other people and only after that becoming
understood by others

• She showed willingness to be of service and developing of


others, anticipating the needs of others, recognizing and
fulfilling and discovering the development needs of others and
promoting their skills

• Her motivation was to collaborate, consciousness of the emotional


flows and empowerment relations

• She understood utilization of diversity

©Venla Varis
15
9. Transformative learning

 Her focus of learning is life skills and wisdom


- She learned to regocnize and to value her
impacts

 She felt sense of unknown and was able to


compare it to her previous experience with:
- positive emotions
- open mind
- constructive attitudes

 She was able to:


- improve from the level minimization
to acceptance

 her plan is to reach adaptation level ©Venla Varis


world view and empathy
16

10. Learners’ resource management


Ievo has

 Basic virtual learning skills


 Point of studies: meaning and utilization of
previous experiences
 Motivation, intention and goal choice abilities
 Mastery and performance orientation
 Self-regulative and creative learning
 Transformative learning skills
 Collaborative and co-operative learning skills
©Venla Varis
17

Levels of Communication (case Ievo)


High
Synergistic (Win/Win

TRUST Respectful (Compromise)

Defensive (Win/lose or Lose/Win


Low
Low COOPERATION High

©S. Covey, 1989


Team members in Z-process 18
Ievo in collaborative team (Z – prosess)
Informal
Spontaneous
1. 2.
I- D I-S
3.
Conceptual

Normative
Adaptive
Dominant

FACILTATOR
D-C – I-S

4. 5.
D-S C-S

Formal
Methodical

© Mlp,V. Varis 2004


19
9. Self-ínquiry

Ievo’s socio - cultural competence is on the


level

• Integration- Excellent………………
• Adaptation- Very good X ( 19 points)
• Acceptance Good …………………
• Minimization Satisfied…………….
• Deviant & Defence poor……………

Ievo’s own assessment with reasoning is in her


Portfolio (29 pages) on the level acceptance (18
points)
Her personal development plan is to improve:
-Adaptation and situational awareness
-Proactive way of thinking
-Collective understanding
-Skills to empower team members’ learning

©Venla Varis
20
QUALITY OF PORTFOLIOS
Flow
Greatest gainers per-
Positive affective and 15 % fec-
volitional experiences tio-
low learner empowerment well nists
done Excellent work 15 %8 %
15 %

Normal performance 13 %
Easy
learning 8 %
OK 4 %
The opponents-
Anxiety 8 %
not motivated 15 %
Negative affective and volitional experiences

You might also like