Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Code of Conduct For Organisations: by CA Kamal Garg (B. Com (H), FCA, DISA (ICAI) )
Code of Conduct For Organisations: by CA Kamal Garg (B. Com (H), FCA, DISA (ICAI) )
Code of Conduct For Organisations: by CA Kamal Garg (B. Com (H), FCA, DISA (ICAI) )
By;
CA Kamal Garg
[B. Com (H), FCA, DISA (ICAI)]
cakamalgarg@gmail.com
Introduction
Exceptions:
1. Employee;
2. Partner;
3. Other open means (e.g. Clause 6 or 7);
4. Persons as per Clause 2, 3 and 4
Professional Bodies
for Clause 2, 3 and 5
1. ICSI;
2. ICWAI;
3. Bar Council;
4. Indian Institute of Architects;
5. Institute of Actuaries
Specified Qualified Persons
for Clause 2, 3, 4 and 5
1. CS;
2. CWA;
3. Bachelor in Law (from recognised
University or Institution);
4. Bachelor in Engineering;
5. Bachelor in Architecture;
6. Actuary;
7. B Tech;
8. MBA (from recognised University or
Institution recognised by AICTE)
Membership of Professional
Bodies
for Clause 4
1. ICSI;
2. ICWAI;
3. Advocate (i.e. member of Bar Council);
4. Engineer (i.e. member of Institution of
Engineers);
5. Architect (i.e. member of Indian
Institute of Architects);
6. Actuary (i.e. member of Institute of
Actuaries)
First Schedule:
Part II
First Schedule:
Part III
Second Schedule:
Part I
Clause 1
Clause 2
Clause 3
Clause 4
Clause 8
Clause 9
Clause 7
Second Schedule:
Part II
Central Council General Guidelines,
2008
(earlier referred as ICAI Notifications)
Books of Accounts
Practicing CA/ Firm to maintain
proper books including:
1.Cash book;
2.Ledger
Tax Audit Assignments u/s
44AB
Limited up to 45 in a financial year;
This limit is applicable on per partner
basis;
Each year audit is a separate audit
assignment;
Maintain record of assignments;
Part Time practicing CA shall not be
considered
Number of Audit
Assignments under
Companies Act, 1956
Limits u/s 224(1B) + Exemptions u/s
224(1B) < 30;
Maintain record of audit assignment;
Limit applicable to per practicing CA;
Part time practicing CA not counted
Minimum Audit Fees
(omitted w.e.f. June 7th
2011)
Undisputed Audit Fees
Guilty if appointment as an auditor
accepted
Where
Undisputed audit fees, has not been
paid by the entity to previous auditor
Exception : Audit of Sick Unit
Appointment as Cost Auditor u/s
233B
Guilty if accepts appointment u/s
233B while he is:
1.Auditor of Company u/s 224;
2.Officer or employee of company;
3.Partner or employee of (2);
4.Partner or employee of (1);
5.Indebted/ provided guarantee/
security to company for > Rs. 1,000
Appointment as Auditor while
indebted
Guilty if:
1.Accepts appointment as auditor u/s 224
when indebted > Rs. 1,000;
2.Accepts appointment as auditor in other
cases when indebted > Rs. 10,000;
3.If other limits given by some other
statute then they would be applicable
Internal auditor, concurrent auditor not
covered by this Guideline;
In case of firm, if one partner is ineligible,
then whole firm is ineligible
Remuneration for Statutory
Audit and Other Work
Applicable to audit and other work of only:
1.PSU;
2.Govt. Co.;
3.Listed Co.;
4.Other Public Co. having turnover > Rs. 50
crores in a year
Other Work Fees > Statutory Audit
Fees = Guilty of Professional
Misconduct
Remuneration for Statutory
Audit and Other Work
Other Work as per Section 2(2)(iv) &
Regulation 190A but does not include:
1.Audit under any other statute;
2.Certification work done by statutory
auditors;
3.Representation before an authority
Guideline applicable to CA in
aggregate (i.e. collectively to their
firm/ MCC/ associates etc.)
Developing Model Code of Conduct
Typically, a Code of Conduct for any organisation
should have the following essential elements:
1. Preamble
2. Applicability
3. Set of Rules including contribution to the society, being
honest and integral, maintaining confidentiality,
teamwork, compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, dealing with media, observing entitys
discipline mechanism, related party transactions, etc.
4. Continuous updating the laid down code of conduct
Challenges in implementing Code of Conduct
An important and implicit assumption of many writings on
corporate codes is that such codes do have a 'real' effect
upon behaviour;
This tends to be something that is taken for granted, but it
is not empirically validated by subsequent investigation
It is important to note that codes of conduct do not in
themselves invoke compliance.
Even with a code of ethics, ethical behavior is not
necessarily assured.
Conformance with code of conduct is influenced by three
factors, namely:
1. the extent of internalization of the codes,
2. effects of non-compliance, and
3. group identity pressures
General Observations for being
ineffectiveness of Code of Conduct
1. Majority of employees are ignorant of the code of conduct;
2. Lack of adequate and regular education of employees about
code of conduct affected its practice;
3. Senior managers never practice what the code of conduct says;
4. Code of conduct is just on paper not being practiced;
5. Code of conduct has brought about very little or no change into
the behaviour of public servants;
6. Too many inconsistencies and impartiality in administering code
of conduct have made it unsuccessful;
7. Copies of the codes are not made available to staff;
8. The language of the code of conduct is too difficult to
comprehend;
9. Code of conduct is obsolete;
10. The administrative culture does not encourage good behaviour
Model Code of Conduct*
Preamble:
Commitment to ethical professional conduct is a MUST for every
employee at ABC Limited in all of its businesses/ units/
subsidiaries. This code, consisting of imperatives formulated as
statements of personal responsibility, identifies the elements of
such a commitment. It contains many, but not all, issues employees
are likely to face.
The code is intended to serve as a basis for ethical decision-
making in the conduct of professional work. It may also serve as a
basis for judging the merit of a formal complaint pertaining to
violation of professional ethical standards.