Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA

TOWARDS AN AUDIT OF
NATIONAL SURGICAL PRACTICE
NM Foley1, DJ Bowden1, G Kane2, C Fleming2, M Casey3, R Prichard2,
EW McDermott2, D Quill1, A Lowery4, MJ Kerin1
1. Department of Surgery, University College Hospital Galway
2. Department of Surgery, St Vincents University Hospital
3. Department of Histopathology, University College Hospital Galway
4. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Limerick
Background 1 of 4

Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Rare

Hormone secreting

Diagnostic challenge

10% are malignant


Background 2 of 4

Increasing use of imaging

Increasing Ix of htn in endocrine setting

Increasing pick-up rate for incidentalomata


Background 3 of 4

Changes in surgical practice

Heterogeneity of practice

Open
Laparoscopic
Retroperitoneoscopic

Perioperative management
Background 4 of 4

National registries

National joint registry

National cancer registry


Objectives

To obtain an overview of national surgical practice in


pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma
Methods 1

Databases from two tertiary centers

GUH

SVUH

Cases from 2001 - 2015


Methods 2

Demographics

Localisation

Pathology

Peri-operative Mx

Surgical Mx

Outcomes
Results 1

N = 28

27 Pheochromocytoma 1 Paraganglioma
One malignant pheo

10 male 18 female

Mean age 54 (range 21 - 80)


Results 2

18 patients were symptomatic at diagnosis

Peri-operative Mx

All received preoperative blockade


Phenoxybenzamine n=23
Prazocin n=1
Doxazocin n=1
Combination n=3
Results 3 Technique

Surgical Mx

Open n = 10

Lap n= 8

Retro n = 10 Open Laparoscopic Retroperitoneoscopic

2 conversions in each group


Results 3 Technique

Surgical Mx

Open n = 10

Lap n= 8

Retro n = 10 Open Laparoscopic Lap converted Retroperitoneoscopic Retro - converted

2 conversions in each group


Results 4

Complications
Min invasive 4/18
Open 6/10

Clavien-Dindo grading of complications


I n=2
II n=5
III n=1
IV n=7
Results 5

Median post operative stay

Open 12.5 days

Minimally invasive 4.5 days


Conclusions

Minimally invasive techniques demonstrate benefits in

Reduced morbidity

Reduced inpatient convalescence

Variety of surgical practice

Variety of perioperative practice

Scope for development of national registry

You might also like