This document discusses how ESOPs (employee stock ownership plans) have evolved from being used primarily for employee benefit purposes to also serving as an anti-takeover defense. It notes a key takeover battle in 1988 where an ESOP was used defensively. While ESOPs are less effective than poison pills, they can still deter takeovers as a substitute defense. ESOPs may increase or decrease shareholder wealth through tax benefits versus reduced takeovers, requiring further analysis. The document also outlines how an ESOP can be leveraged as part of a leveraged buyout process.
This document discusses how ESOPs (employee stock ownership plans) have evolved from being used primarily for employee benefit purposes to also serving as an anti-takeover defense. It notes a key takeover battle in 1988 where an ESOP was used defensively. While ESOPs are less effective than poison pills, they can still deter takeovers as a substitute defense. ESOPs may increase or decrease shareholder wealth through tax benefits versus reduced takeovers, requiring further analysis. The document also outlines how an ESOP can be leveraged as part of a leveraged buyout process.
This document discusses how ESOPs (employee stock ownership plans) have evolved from being used primarily for employee benefit purposes to also serving as an anti-takeover defense. It notes a key takeover battle in 1988 where an ESOP was used defensively. While ESOPs are less effective than poison pills, they can still deter takeovers as a substitute defense. ESOPs may increase or decrease shareholder wealth through tax benefits versus reduced takeovers, requiring further analysis. The document also outlines how an ESOP can be leveraged as part of a leveraged buyout process.
This document discusses how ESOPs (employee stock ownership plans) have evolved from being used primarily for employee benefit purposes to also serving as an anti-takeover defense. It notes a key takeover battle in 1988 where an ESOP was used defensively. While ESOPs are less effective than poison pills, they can still deter takeovers as a substitute defense. ESOPs may increase or decrease shareholder wealth through tax benefits versus reduced takeovers, requiring further analysis. The document also outlines how an ESOP can be leveraged as part of a leveraged buyout process.
company with the purpose of employee respression Now on, ESOP become an Anti- takeover Defense PolaroidShamrock Holdings takeover battle in 1988. Effectiveness of ESOPs as an Anti-takeover Defense
ESOPs compare favorably even with
poison pills. poison pills still the most important anti- takeover defense in the 2000s. ESOPs only a substitutes for other anti-takeover defenses such as poison pills. ESOPs and SHAREHOLDER WEALTH
ESOPs may have an impact on
shareholder wealth in two opposing ways. 1. provide tax benets to corporations = lower their tax liabilities = increasing SH wealth 2. used as an antitakeover defense = reducing shareholder wealth . Further analysis is needed to prove both of two impact ESOPs and LBO Leverage ESOPs Process ESOPs may be used to lower the cost of the LBO by taking advantage of the tax deductions allowable under the law. LESOP uses the loan proceeds to purchase stock in the new corporation rather than to purchase assets. The new corporation uses the proceeds of the sale to buy the assets of the parent corporation. Step 1. A new company is formed, which will be the division in an independent form. Step 2. The management of the division, which will constitute the new owners of that part of the parent company. Step 3. An ESOP for the new company is established. The ESOP negotiates with a bank or other lenders for a loan. Step 4. Then the ESOP uses its loan proceeds to purchase newly issued stock of the new company. Step 5. The new company agrees to make tax- deductible contributions to the ESOP for the repayment of the ESOPs debt.