Case Study of Supervisor Training To Optimize Response in Food Processing Industry

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Case Study of Supervisor Training To Optimize Response To

Injury In The Food Processing Industry


INTRODUCTION

Work and organizational factors have been shown to influence


the frequency and disability duration associated with common
workplace injuries, and this has led to growing interest among
employers to improve disability management practices.
Although modified duty programs have been shown to reduce
disability costs methods for obtaining supervisor support and
participation in these activities have not been studied.
OBJECTIVE OF THE CASE STUDY

The objective of this controlled study is to assess the


effectiveness of a supervisor training workshop to improve
the responses of supervisors to workers' health and safety
concerns and to reduce workforce disability in the food
processing industry
METHOD
Participants:-
- Participants were 23 supervisors (22 male, 1 female) representing
the primary production departments of a food processing plant in
the north eastern United States.
- Supervisors from 28 departments participated.
- Age of the supervisors was 24 to 53 and their tenure ranged from
3 months to 34 years.
- All but two supervisors had worked as production line
employees at the same company before being promoted to
supervisory positions.
METHOD
Procedure:-
- All supervisors were asked to complete a survey relating to
workplace safety and disability.
- This information, in addition to a series of interviews with
workers and supervisors and other needs assessment strategies
provided a basis for design of the workshops.
- Departments selected for study were divided into two groups
randomly.
- This provided two groups of supervisors who were incharge of
400 employees each.
METHOD
- One group of supervisors was randomly chosen to participate in
the first workshop program, while the other served as a (7-month
delayed intervention) cross-over control group.
- The managers in the first group were invited to participate in the
training programme which went on for several weeks.
- Seven months later the second group was invited.
- The seven-month lag was set to provide a reasonable, short-term
evaluation of program effectiveness while avoiding periods of
peak plant production.
TRAINING WORKSHOP
Training workshops were held in two 2- hour sessions separated
by 4 to 7 days.
Multiple workshop sessions were available to provide optimal
group sizes for discussion (no more than 8 supervisors per
workshop).
Primary elements of the workshop are
- Information about the different work injuries and statics related
to it, research supporting the key role of supervisor to prevent
disability.
- Communication with the workers about the pain and injury.
- Understanding the discomfort of muscoskeletal pain and injury.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Outcomes for Group I (treatment group) and Group II (delayed-
treatment control group) were compiled.
Out-come measures were aggregated for three time periods:
- seven months prior to the Group I training,
- seven months between the Group I and II trainings
- seven months following the Group II training.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Group 1 experienced a reduction of 47% in new injury claim rate
between periods 1 and 2.
In the absence of supervisor training group 2 showed an increase
of 27% of new injury claim rate in periods 1 and 2.
There was not much improvement when the supervisor training
crossed over to the delayed treatment control group.
CONCLUSION
This case study has shown evidence of a substantial reduction in
injury claim frequency and disability after implementing a
training workshop to improve responses to health and safety
concerns of workers for supervisors in the food processing
industry.
It also suggests that improved communication between
supervisors and workers about work-related health concerns may
be an effective secondary prevention strategy for employers in
industries with high physical work demands.
CONCLUSION
Supervisors' increased willingness to address reports of minor
discomfort may have prevented symptoms to escalate to
disabling levels requiring medical treatment.
Also, employee viewed their supervisors as more flexible and
helpful to overcome minor discomfort, thus reducing the
perceived need of validation by filing a workers' compensation
claim
Ergonomic component of the training led to increased efforts
among supervisors to address ergonomic risk factors, thus
reducing the frequency of musculoskeletal problems.
BIBLOGRAPHY
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7300103_A_controlled
_case_study_of_supervisor_training_to_optimize_response_to_i
njury_in_the_food_processing_industry

You might also like