Professional Documents
Culture Documents
UMTS Technology and Its Evolution - En.slo
UMTS Technology and Its Evolution - En.slo
UMTS Technology and Its Evolution - En.slo
User Services:
Following are the some of the examples:
E-mail.
Telecommuting.
Multimedia messaging.
Improved quality of service.
Support for video and audio clips.
Wireless personal Internet-information anywhere at anytime.
Existing GSM and UMTS Service Concept
Name Flexi BTS Mast Head RF Module changed to OBSAI 40W Remote
Radio Head
Added RNC450 Coverage Optimised Solutions
Removed Path Selection
Removed UBR+ for Iub User Plane
Removed Transport Bearer Tuning
Name Hybrid BTS Backhaul using DSL and Ethernet only changed to Hybrid
BTS Backhaul
Added Combined and Optimized 2G/3G backhaul (One Pipe)
RAS06
Transport
Iub and HSDPA Efficiency
Hybrid BTS Backhaul
Combined and Optimized 2G/3G Backhaul (One Pipe)
Indoor Solutions
Pico WCDMA BTS Rel 2 (P7 Q1/08)
RAS06
Introduction
RU10 introduces several new features. In transport solutions, the new IP
based interfaces are a major improvement. These enable the user to
choose between the ATM and IP solutions, thus making the network
configurations more flexible. Place this before RU10 where RU10
information is being added. RU10 is supported in Release 6 and 7 of
UMTS.0.
RU10
Evolution of RU10
RU10 was first released in 2008. It is combination of UMR and RAS06.
Now you will study the RU10 features in brief.
Nokia Siemens Networks will harmonize WCDMA/HSPA roadmap
starting with RU10.
Nokia Siemens Networks will provide improved roadmap to both Nokia
and Siemens customers.
The first common release RU10 will be available Q2 2008
RU10 content will be feature rich and it will include N-S Iub interface,
enabling connection of Nokia and Siemens Node B to RNC2600
UMTS Release 6
Transport
HSDPA Congestion Control
Full Native IP Connectivity
Timing over Packet
Indoor Solutions
Home Access Point Solution
Introduction to Flexi Multimode Base Station
1.- The maximum bit rates still are factor 20 and more behind the current
state of the art systems like 802.11n and 802.16e/m. Even the support for
higher mobility levels is not an excuse for this.
2.- The latency of user plane traffic (UMTS: >30 ms) and of resource
assignment procedures (UMTS: >100 ms) is too big to handle traffic with
high bit rate variance efficiently.
Traffic volume
Revenue
/bit
Profitability
Network
cost
Voice dominated Data dominated
Time
Source: Light Reading (adapted)
LTE: lower cost per bit and improved end user experience
LTE = Long Term Evolution
OFDM technology
Flat, scalable IP based Decreased cost / GB
architecture
History and Future of Wireless
HSDPA/EUL SAE(LTE)
WCDMA/cdma2000
HIGH GSM/IS95 3G Enhancement 3G Evolution
3G
AMPS 2G
1G
802.16a/d 802.16e
LOW
< 200 kbps < 1 Mbps < 10 Mbps < 50 Mbps < 100 Mbps < 1 Gbps
Networks Architecture Evolution
RNC RNC
Evolved
Node B Node B Node B + Node B
(NB) (NB) RNC (eNB)
Functionality
Current alternatives for wireless data
transmission
WiMAX WLAN (802.11) HSDPA (High
802.11n offers data Speed Downlink
802.16 working rates up to 550..630 Packet Access)
group of IEEE Mbps utilizing MIMO Pushes the
(Multiple Input downlink packet bit
first offered only bit Multiple Output) rates to over 10
rates around 100 In addition to this Mbps on physical
Mbps for stationary quality of service layer (around 7.2
usage (QoS) is now also Mbps above
part of WLAN, which physical layer).
New versions of will make it possible
802.16 to do streaming or
(802.16e/m) will VoIP via WLAN.
offer bit rates up to WLAN still lacks
support for high
1 Gbps stationary mobility users, but
and around 100 this has never been
Mbps for mobile a major design goal
usage. for 802.11 working
group.
The right solution for each segment
High speed data rates High speed data with Broadband multimedia
with full mobility limited mobility with full mobility
WiMAX and HSPA/LTE Technology Positioning
Spectrum
Licenced
HSPA for paired FDD spectrum HSPA/LTE
FDD band
LTE initially for paired FDD
spectrum Licenced
WiMAX
WiMAX initially for unpaired TDD TDD band
spectrum
Interworking
Tight interworking between 3GPP
technologies (HSPA, LTE) including cdma
common network management and
handovers GSM
Loose interworking between 3GPP WCDMA
and WiMAX LTE
Max path loss 1 Mbps / 64 kbps 162 dB 162 dB 153 dB 162 dB 110 dB
Spectrum IMT-2000 bands IMT-2000 bands 2300, 2500, 3500 IMT-2000 bands 2400, 5400
Cell range in urban area (indoor 2.87.4 km 2.87.4 km 0.61.5 km 2.87.4 km 30100 m
outdoor)
All radio standards show comparable performance under comparable conditions and similar feature set:
Laws of physics apply to all of them (Shannon Theory)
User rates mainly depend on bandwidth, modulation/coding and availability of MIMO (2x2 assumed)
Spectrum Efficiency is determined by Frequency Reuse and Feature Set (e.g. FSPS, MIMO, )
Latency (e.g. PING Performance) depends on chosen Frame Duration or TTI
Coverage depends on frequency band, RF power limitations and duplex mode
Wimax & LTE, 3G and HSPA
FEATURES AND Wimax/LTE 3G HSPA
TECHNIQUES
Frequency reuse 4-1(WiMAX) 1 (LTE) 1 1
Terminal antenna Omni or directional Omni Omni
Channel impairment Sensitive to doppler Sensitive to Sensitive to
multipath multipath
Base station antenna Directional, array Directional Directional
Main radio KPI SINR EcNo EcNo (SINR)
Dominant Traffic Data Voice Data
Handover Scheme HHO SHO HHO (HSDPA)
SHO (HSUPA)
Own-cell Interference Adjacent subcarriers Other codes in the Other codes in the
at high doppler cell, non- cell, non-
orthogonality orthogonality
issues issues
Capacity Expansion Increasing the More carriers More carriers
OFDMA bandwidth using Inter-
or more carriers frequency
Handover
LTE Schedule
Commercial solutions
in 2009/2010
Standardization
LTE/SAE key Requirements
User experience ARPU Investment Protection
Throughput Latency
Re-use of
Sites and
infrastructure
Backhauling
Frequency bands
HSPA LTE HSPA LTE
or
900 MHz GSM LTE
3G 3.5G iHSPA LTE 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020
user experience
Throughput Latency
3.5G
iHSPA
LTE
Traffic (MByte/Month)
Profitable not profitable
General Requirements for LTE
Requirements Excerpt
significantly increased downlink bit rates
Requirements Input (>100 Mbps)
significantly increased uplink bit rates (50
Mbps)
Demand for higher
data rates increased cell edge bit rates
low delay
Demand for quality of
service, lower delay
higher spectrum efficiency
2G/3G spectrum refarming for LTE
Expected new spectrum scalable bandwidth per cell (operator
allocations
choice)
Request for flexible acceptable Network and Terminal
bandwidth usage complexity and costs (lower than
WCDMA)
Demand for reduced
Network complexity Flet Network Architecture: 2 nodes
Architecture: one NE in RAN + 1NE in
Demand for reduced Core
Terminal complexity
IP Based interfaces
optimization for low speed (0-15 km/h)
but support for high and highest speed
(up to 500 km/h)
compatibility with WCDMA
Requirements for LTE Air Interface
OFDMA (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access)
DOWNLINK
UPLINK
cell IP Network
Gateway
< 5 ms (unloaded condition)
IDLE ACTIVE
(no resources)
Resource
No resource
Allocated
< 100 ms
< 50 ms
Overview of LTE/SAE design benefits
UMTS Specifications:
The following figure is taken directly from the specification and
identifies where to find information on the types of services that
have been covered in this module:
Review
4. A cluster is:
a. A location area.
b. An area of cells, where the hole set of frequency is used
once.
c. Cellular network of one operator.
d. Coverage area of one BSC.
e. Coverage area of one BTS.