Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparison Between Compressors
Comparison Between Compressors
Different Types of
Compressors
Performance and Efficiency
Flow Rate and Pressure Ratio (single stage)
Flow Pressure Efficie Additional
Type
Rate Ratio ncy comments
Very high Low - narrow operating
(860k (1.05 2.1; up region
Axial-flow 80 91 % + smaller and lighter
ft3/min) to 30 for
multistage) than centrifugal
Medium
High 75 87 % + very wide operating
Centrifugal (170k region
(1.2 9.0)
ft3/min)
High
Reciprocatin Low
(4; 8 for low 75 82 %
g
capacity)
Low High 75 82 %
Rotary
(15k ft3/min) (2 5)
Obtainable Pressures and Power Consumption
Obtainable
Type Power Consumption
Pressures
Multistage: 15 kW (2000 hp) for
light gases. 4 kW (500 hp) general
Centrifugal > 34.5 MPa (5000 psi)
hydrocarbon
Single Stage: Low power
Reciprocating 690 MPa (105 psi) 110 kW (15000 hp)
Sliding-Vane: 0.86 MPa (125
psi)
Sliding-Vane: 3 kW (400 hp)
Straight-lobe: 83 kPa (12 psi)
Straight-lobe: ---------
Rotary Liquid-Piston: 0.52 MPa (75
Liquid-Piston: -----------
psi)
Screw: 10 6000 hp
Helical Screw: 1.17 MPa (170
psi)
Advantages of Centrifugal Compressors
Low cost.
Highest compression efficiency and overall efficiency
over all types of rotary compressors.
Very high volumetric efficiency and hence high flow
rate with respect to machine size
Continuous lubrication of internal rubbing parts is
required (10 times more than reciprocating machines).
High maintenance due to wear.
Sensitive to solids in gas stream and so require filters
in air service.
Pros and Cons of Liquid Ring Rotary Compressors