election Project Fund Village and PNPM

Project PNPM be used for

100% Village Use Fund Village for need 60% activity Rehabilitation and
Infrastructure
Conservation
Hall Meeting Type
Office Village Name Project
Project
PKK office manufacture Fertilizer Compost empowerment
Street Environment
Street Business farmer cultivation Clove, Pala, rambutan Rehabilitation

Bridge cultivation Mahogany Rehabilitation

Market Village
cultivation Nutmeg and sengon Rehabilitation
polindes
INFRASTRUCTURE cultivation Nutmeg and Sengoon Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Building TK
Beronjong River Renovation Water springs Palayuga Infrastructure
Drainage
barrier Waves Infrastructure
talud
basin container Water Rain Conservation Coral Conservation

IHC
Means Water Clean
lavatory
election Project Fund Village
Example Project that
Proyek yang bisa didanai dana desa stated Village is record:
5
4
3
9/9 Street, Bridge, and
Infrastructure
In Determination Project
too must consider Status
Village, in Village
2 Village by include BUMDES
Waangu-Angu, Some
1
community in plan talud
0
TK (Salary Project as Field kick Ball
Proyek-Proyek yang Sesuai dengan Proyek-proyek Lainnya
dekat dengan Permendagri dan dibawah 1<M
kindergarten teacher) no refraction use fund
Masyarakat dan Pagu pagu yang
Dapat dirasakan diberikan oleh etc village because village
Langsung oleh
masyarakat
Pemerintah
WC, Air clean mentioned entry
Home worthy Huni category Village left
behind
Proposed Approved
Proyek Proyek yang Tidak bisa Didanai Dana Desa Example Project that
when Proposed
5

4
2/ 9 stated Village is:
Project Religious
Education
mentioned urgent,
Corresponding with
Village declare
3 budgets that there is,
Priority Studio Art
2 community already Approved by
Field kick ball
Could included consultant technical
1
to proposal year Funeral
0 next
Proyek di Bidang yang Proyek yang membutuhkan Proyek Proyek yang bukan
merupakan kewenangan Dana Besar (>1 M) menjadi Prioritas Masyarakat
Pemerintah Pusat pada sasat Musrembang
OVERVIEW OF THE VILLAGE / VILLAGE AND POLICY FUND VILLAGE

Jumlah Penduduk Desa Number of Projects funded by Dana Desa

2500 10
2000 8
1500
6
1000
4
500
0 2

0
2015 2016 2017

1 project 2 projects not identified yet

Jumlah Dana Desa Per Desa 2015 - 2017

Sumber Pagu Informasi Dana Desa
1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000 11%
400000 Pagu BPM
300000 11% Pagu Kementerian
200000
100000 Pagu Pemerintah Pusat
0 56%
11%
Pagu Rapat Kepala Desa
11% Pendamping

2015 2016 2017

Evaluation PNPM Green
Keberhasilan PNPM Consideration in PNPM Green is:
Hijau dalam kegiatan Some Project cultivation no enclose Countermeasures
Disease (Kaongkongkea)
Sukses dengan No there is training and care cultivation Mahogany
25% Pertimbangan
37% Sukses No Success:
Because head village no involved
Tidak Sukses
38% No be adapted with condition village

Some Village meet difficulty in:

Kesulitan dalam Proyek Time project that no be adapted with circumstances
environment village (Kel, Todombulu)
material Material that is relative low quality (Ds.
movement Prosperous)
33% 34% Sulit No be adapted with priority village (Ds. Clothing Food)
Tidak ada No Success:
Tidak tahu
No there is clarity project (Ds.Tira)
33% No know project come just
Evaluation and Supervision PNPM Green
Evaluation: Pengawasan Proyek PNPM
Pencapaian PNPM 1. Village Waangu-Angu
No clarity care project
Merealisasi Tujuan Desa thereafter
No there is act more
12% Desa
from project
2. Urban Village Todombulu Tidak Ada
25%
Lack of fund for 63%
25% Sudah Membantu kelurahan Tim Kecamatan dan
Desa

50% Tidak ada Reason no success :

1. Village Tira
Sudah membantu
25%
dengan Evaluasi No Ever held
2. Village Clothing Food
Team supervisor districts
Only a little people who
1. Tim TPK districts that be formed from SK district
get plant teak and
2. companion Technical
mahogany
Team supervisor Village
1. TPK Village that be formed time Musrembang
2. community
PNPM - Influence in Period Long
There two exception: Influence in Period Long When:
Pengaruh dalam Jangka Project will take effect in period long
Panjang when there is care and training Quantity seedling propagated (1/9 Village)
fertilization (Village Kancinaa) training Eradication Hama (3/9 Village)
When locations cultivation tree held
training Maintenance (3/9 Village)
in locations that no critical (Village
13%
Clothing Food) release land for cultivation (1/9 Village)
Ya involve all element community (2/9 Village)
Tidak training Distance planting (2/9 Village)
87%
Maintenance Project (talud) (1/9 Village)
training into consultant in village (1/9 Village)
Sustainability Project (2/9 Village)

"Program should next however added with training to community, for example training way planting, distance
cultivation, and too eradication pest, community too need involved in activity training"- Head Village Kancinaa
learning - plan
Fund Village
all village declare Head Village
and all Element community
involved in plan project,
Head Village knowing process
filing to reception fund
all activity plan budgets held by
Village
Project held throughout village
without with the exception of
PNPM Green
Only four village that say
involved in plan project,
Head village no knowing process
funding and processing from
government center to to village
plan budgets held by districts
There ranking system proposal
so that no all village receive
fund
learning - Implementation
Fund Village
all community participated in
implementation and supervision
Some village no get supervision
and accompaniment from
center in comprehensive
Head Village responsible answer
on all activity and
implementation work to
community
Management finance Fund
Village submitted to village
PNPM Green
Implementation held by Tim TPK
from districts
No all community receive
benefit from PNPM Green
Implementation, Supervision
and Accompaniment held by
Center to ketahap end
Party districts that responsible
answer on implementation
project
Management finance held by
districts
learning - Report accountability answer
Fund Village PNPM Green
Head Village responsible answer
on report accountability answer Processing LPJ held by
fund village districts
Head Village knowing process
activity reporting to to stage Head village no involved in
administration file document to manufacture LPJ however
BPMD
Head Village knowing document
responsible answer on
document What just that must be handover evidence finance
given to government district in
case this BPMD and Department
finance
oblige Head Village for doing
function computation in
manufacture LPJ
learning - Influence
Fund Village
Fund Village perceived more
helpful for village because all
village receive fund mentioned
Fund Village adjust with activity
that be expected village
Fund Village give influence
directly and helpful to
community
influence no focus to field - field
, no corresponding with condition
PNPM Green
Aim clear, so that program
implementation more directional
and helpful especially on
environment
community receive benefit directly
from PNPM Green on time
implementation however tend less
take effect in period long
however community still rate
PNPM Green no relevant proposal
proposal community so that tend
finally no treated by community or
field