Oleh : Dr. Ir.

Rachmat Sudibjo
Peta Struktur Reservoir
Struktur Reservoir

3
SUMUR PRODUKSI & PENGOLAHAN LAPANGAN
Radial flow geometry
Pressure profile around wellbore
Drainage radius
Aliran fluida dalam formasi
(Inflow Performance)
 PRODUKTIVITAS SUMUR

PI = q /(Pr-Pwf)
PI : productivity index
Q : production rate
Pr: reservoir pressure
Pwf: well bottom hole pressure
Productivity Index (PI) & IPR Linier
 Darcys Law for radial flow :

where: pi = pressure at point of interest (pounds per square inch)

pe = pressure at drainage radius of well (pounds per square inch)

q = production rate (stock tank barrels of oil per day)

Bo = formation volume factor of produced oil (reservoir barrels per stock tank barrel)

Meu= viscosity of produced fluids (centipoise)

k = formation permeability (millidarcies)

h = thickness of the reservoir (feet)

re = drainage radius of well (feet)

ri = radial distance from wellbore to the point of interest (feet)

Metode of determining Skin

Horner plot of shut-in pressure for a buildup
test.
Pressure Profile, Damage Well
IPR Linier (@berbagai harga FE)
VOGEL CORRELATION
 VOGEL CORRELATION
FOR VARIOUS FE

(FE=1)

q / Qmax (FE=1)
IPR : metoda HARRISON
IPR SUMUR, Pwf < Pb
INFLOW PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP
(depleted reservoir)
 COMPOSITE IPR
of different layers

teknik reservoir lanjut - RS -teknik

25
perminyakan - trisakti
Equations
NODAL ANALYSIS
POINT OF NODES
NODAL ANALYSIS
PRESSURE LOSSES
 Multiphase flow in pipes
Pressure loss in fluid flow:

Elevation or static component

Friction component
Acceleration component

dP/dZ = dP/dZ elev + dP/dZ frict + dP/dZ accel

Multiphase flow in pipe
FLOW PATTERN
Multiphase flow in TUBING
FLOW PATTERN
FRICTION FACTOR
PRESSURE TRAVERSE
(TUBING)
 Vertical flow
Pressure traverse
 Horizontal Flow
Pressure traverse
 Vertical flow
Pressure traverse
Fig. 1. Complex producing system
Fig. 2.Nodes for complex producing system
Fig. 3. Simple producing system
Fig. 4. Nodes for simple producing system
 Example Problem
NODAL ANALYSIS

Oil rate Pressure drop Pressure drop

BOPD Tubing (psi) Flow line (psi)

1 200 635 15
2 400 740 40
3 600 850 80
4 800 990 130
5 1000 1095 175
6 1500 1420 320
 O
D
A
L
A
N NODAL NO
O
T D
D
N
N A
NODAL AT SEPARATOR:
O
A
O
L
D
L
D A
P sep = .... (constnt)
A
A
TL
T
L S
P sep = P wf P tubing P flowline
A
N
A
O
T
E
T P
D
N
NODAL AT WELLHEAD:
B
A
O
O A
LD
P wh = P sep + P flowlineRA
T
T
A
TL
P wh = P wf - P tubing TO
O
M
B
A
TO
H R
TB
O
T
O
L
O
T
E
TM
:
H
O
O
 A N
L O
A D
N NODAL
T
N
N
O
A
L
O
O D A
D
D A +
NODAL AT BOTTOM HOLE:
A
L
A L +
L A T
P wf = P sep + P flowline + P tubing
A
T
A T S
T N E
P wf = Pr q / PI
N
O
B O P
O D
D
NODAL AT RESERVOIR:
A
T
T
A A
R
L L
P r = P sep + P flowline + PAT tubing + Pr
A
O
M
A
T T
P r = .... (constant)
B
H
O
B
O
O
R
O
L T
T
E T
T
: O
O
M M
H H
O O
Fig. 5. Effect of separator pressure on
well performance
Fig. 6. Effect of flow line size on well
performance
Fig. 7. Effect of IPR on well performance
Fig. 8. Effect of tubing size on well performance
Fig. 9. Effect of depletion on well performance
Fig. 10. Effect of perforation on well
performance
Fig. 11. Effect of choke size on well
performance (node 2)
Fig. 12. Effect of choke size on well
performance (node 6 and 3)
Mayer & Garder