Chapter Three: Foreign Policy Decision Making

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

Chapter Three

Foreign Policy Decision Making


The Modern State System
• state sovereignty: the state has supreme
authority over internal affairs; legal equality
with other states
• state: legal entity with permanent population,
well-defined territory, and a government
• nation: collection of people who perceive
common ties based on ethnic, linguistic,
and/or cultural factors
Figure 3.1: The Major Sources of States’
Foreign Policy Decisions:
Influences at Three Levels
Geopolitics

• geopolitics: the interaction of geography


(location, terrain, resources) with world
politics; study of influence of geography on
foreign and military policy
• states’ attributes: size, location, wealth,
domestic political factors
• imperialism
Map 3.1: Geographic Influences on
Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy Determinants

• geopolitical position
• military capabilities
• economic conditions
• type of government
– constitutional democracy
– autocratic
Type of Government
• democratic peace: “Democracies don’t attack
each other.” --Bill Clinton
• end of history: liberal democracies with
market economies are the only workable
options for modern societies
• associated with the neoliberal approach to
using international organizations to promote
peace
Map 3.2: The Map of Freedom: The
Location of Democratically Governed
Countries in 2004
Policy Making as Rational Choice

1. problem recognition and definition


2. goal selection
3. identification of alternatives
4. choice
• associated with realist/state as unitary actor
• 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis
• 1999 Clinton Kosovo intervention
Impediments to Rational Choice
• bounded rationality
• cognitive dissonance
• policy makers’ policy agendas
• satisficing
• prospect theory
• two-level games
• muddling through
• constructivism
Bureaucratic Politics
• bureaucracies: government agencies, regulatory
commissions, departments
• factors bureaucratic efficiency/rationality:
– multiple advocacy
– bureaucratic politics model
– policy networks/caucuses
– standard operating procedures
– groupthink
Table 3.1: Foreign Policy Decision
Making in Theory and Practice
The Role of Leaders

• history-making individual model


– Nixon Doctrine/Reagan Doctrine/Clinton
Doctrine/Bush Doctrine
• procedural rationality: perfect information
and careful weighing of all options
• instrumental rationality: comparing all
options and selecting the best one
Factors Affecting Leadership Capacity

• personality
• degree of control over foreign policy
• sense of political efficacy
• amount of available information
• ability to deal with crises
• “great person” versus zeitgeist debate
Discussion
• What factors explain why George W. Bush did not
take action when given intelligence warnings of
impending terrorist attacks in the weeks prior to
September 11, 2001?
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of the
history-making individuals model? Who qualifies
as a history-making individual?
• What factors explain why bureaucracies do not
always produce the best options?
Discussion, continued

• What are some contemporary examples of


the importance of geopolitics?
• How do the concepts of this chapter explain
the conflict between the George W. Bush
administration and Iraq in 2003?
• In what ways does the individual level of
analysis affect foreign policy making?

You might also like