Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quality Circle - EM58M - AUQCC
Quality Circle - EM58M - AUQCC
BHEL Hyderabad
Mission
We anticipate
Our can do
We are ethical We are change and
We Work We respect spirit delivers
and accountable respond with
Safely one another top
trustworthy for our actions creative
performance
solutions
25
20 19
15
10 7
5 2 3
0 0 0 0
0
Category A Category B Category C
Completed In Progress To be started
17
18
Problem Identification
Brainstorming done to identify the problems in shop and
categorized in A, B, & C category
Category Solving Method
A Category 39
A Category
64%
B Category 19
23
24
Problem Selection
Type A problem selected based on members priority.
Each member have scored the problem to be selected based on scale 1-5.
Project No QCMMP/EM58M/2017/1 Start Date 13-02-2017 End Date 15-05-2017 E Sivakumar Member
Meeting Day Monday 14:30 to 15:30 No. of Projects Completed 3 N Chetan Member
S. No. Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Target Actual
1 Defining the Problem 27-02-2017 -
27
Problem Description 28
Assembly of
Machining of
Finished Product Bearing
Bearing Shell
Components
Turbo-Generator
Bearing Assembly TS
Turbo-generator
Assembly Bearing Assembly
Bearing Pedestal
Bearing Assembly
Bearing
Shell
Spherical
33Diameter Bearing Shell Drawing
34
Problem Description
Bearing Shell Spherical Machining on Horizontal Boring Machine WD-160
Fly Cutter
Bearing Shell Horizontal Boring Machine
35
36
Data Collection
Deviation - Bearing Shell Spherical Dia. (2015 - 2017)
Work Order Drawing Value Max. Size Min. Size Piece Position Inspected Value
Position - 1 270.02
Pc-1 Position - 2 270.20
Position - 3 270.18
1226837708-13901001 270j6(+0.016/-0.016) 270.016 269.984
Position - 1 270.02
Pc-2 Position - 2 270.14
Position - 3 270.16
Position - 1 600.03
Pc-1 Position - 2 600.15
Position - 3 600.05
1024900800-13901001 600(-0.76/-0.146) 599.854 599.240
Position - 1 600.05
Pc-2 Position - 2 600.13
Position - 3 600.06
Position - 1 639.99
1027500300-13901001 640.1(-0.05) 640.100 640.050 Pc-1 Position - 2 639.80
Position - 3 639.98
Position - 1 634.97 Pos-2
Pos.- 3
1020220400-13901001 635.01(-0.05) 635.010 634.960 Pc-1 Position - 2 635.20
Pos.- 1
Position - 3 634.98
Depth of Cut on
3 t mm 3
dia
Machine Hourly Rs./Hrs
4 R 3,500
Rate .
39
Fishbone (Ishikawa) Diagram
Machine Man
Hard Material Operator idleness Poor ergonomics
Machine Capability Less Utilization
Design Constraints Lengthy Process
Manual Operation
Operation Suitability Machine Capability More Cycle time
High Vibration Medical Problems
More Machining Time Frequent Absenteeism
Lack of Knowledge
Old Machine Excess RAM overhang Incompetent Trainer Personal Issues
Poor Training Ignorance Poor surface
Less Cutting Parameter Repeatness
finish, and
Frequent Damage of Tools Manual Excess RAM Repeated Cuts dimensional
overhang Process Inspection Method
Machine Capability Operation inaccuracies
Less Cutting Poor Planning
Material Wastage Measuring
Parameter
Operational Requirements Instrument
Lengthy Process
Market Demand
More Machining Allowance Manual Operation
Hard Material Customer
Requirement
Material Composition Design Constraints More Cycle Time
Design constraint
40
Material Method
6- Finding The Route Cause
Methodology / Tool / Technique Used-
Fishbone Diagram/Ishikawa Diagram
41
Finding TheCause
Route RouteAnalysis
Cause - Man 42
Man
Poor ergonomics
Operator idleness
Less Utilization
Frequent Absenteeism
Medical Problems
Lack of Knowledge
Machine Capability
Design Constraints
Operation Suitability
High Vibration
More Machining Time
43
Finding The Route Cause - Material
Poor surface
finish, and
dimensional
inaccuracies
Frequent Damage of Tools
Inappropriate
Machine Capability Machining
parameters
Material Wastage
Operational Requirements
Material Composition
Design Constraints
44 Material
45
Finding The Route Cause - Method
Poor surface
finish, and
dimensional
inaccuracies
Repeated Cuts Process Inspection Method
Manual Operation
Poor Planning Measuring
Instrument
Lengthy Process
Market Demand
Excess RAM overhang
Method
46
47
Data Analysis
Deviation - Bearing Shell Spherical Dia.
Total number of
Work Order Drawing Value Max. Size Min. Size Piece Position Inspected Value
Position - 1 270.02
Deviations
Pc-1 Position - 2 270.20 observed due to
Position - 3 270.18
1226837708-13901 270j6(+0.016/-0.016) 270.016 269.984
Position - 1 270.02
dimensional
Pc-2 Position - 2 270.14 inaccuracies for the
Position - 3 270.16
Position - 1 600.03 bearing shells
Pc-1 Position - 2 600.15 machining
Position - 3 600.05
1024900800-13901 600(-0.76/-0.146) 599.854 599.240
Position - 1 600.05 completed (2015
Pc-2 Position - 2 600.13 2017) on
Position - 3 600.06
Position - 1 639.99 Horizontal boring
1027500300-13901 640.1(-0.05) 640.100 640.050 Pc-1 Position - 2 639.80
Position - 3 639.98
machine WD-160
Position - 1 634.97 = 6 Nos.
1020220400-13901 635.01(-0.05) 635.010 634.960 Pc-1 Position - 2 635.20
Position - 3 634.98
3
5 CL
CL
2.5
4
LCL 2
3 CL
1.5
2
1
1 0.5
LCL
0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
52
53
Development of Solution
Pradeep Verma Design and manufacture a fixture for Rejected Requires management
auto-rotation approval
Jitendar Yadav Use of CNC Centre Lathe Rejected Problem of holding the
Job
E. Sivakumar Use of Vertical Turning Lathe with Accepted Feasible
additional fixture plate
Spherical Dia.
Fixture Plate
Jaws
Cutting Tool
Chuck
Job
Cutting Tool
58
59
Foreseeing Probable Resistances
Accepted Accepted
and
appreciated
Quality
Technology
Control
Planning &
Tool Room
Stores
Accepted Accepted
60
61
Trial Implementation
Trial Implementation done on 270MW TSGENCO-III TG
bearing shell
Found the average surface roughness within the specified
limit 1.6 (Drawing 3.2)
No dimensional inaccuracies (Average Spherical Dia
599.92 against drawing size 600-0.07/-0.14 )
4 2-3 no. of inserts damage per bearing shell 0-1 no. of inserts damage per bearing shell
High dimensional inaccuracy approx. Dimensional accuracy within control limit
5
0.2mm 0.02mm
6 Manual Operation No Manual Operation
65
66
Regular Implementation
After successful trial implementation quality and
technology department agreed to implement the same for
all upcoming projects.
Spared time (Time Saved) utilized for machining of other
critical components i.e. Rotor Flange Holes, Input Lead
operations, Stator Frames etc.
67
68
Follow-up and Review
Follow-up made till complete machining of bearing for further five
projects as mentioned below-
Work Order Customer Piece Drawing Size Measured Value Surface Roughness
1024901700 TSGENCO-III Pc-1 600-0.07/-0.14 599.92 1.6
Pc-2 600-0.07/-0.14 599.91 1.8
1024901800 TSGENCO-IV Pc-1 600-0.07/-0.14 599.89 1.8
Pc-2 600-0.07/-0.14 599.91 1.7
1024901900 KPCL Pc-1 600-0.07/-0.14 599.91 1.6
Pc-2 600-0.07/-0.14 599.92 1.8
1020103300 TATA Projects Pc-1 635.1-0.05 635.07 1.6
Pc-2 635.1-0.05 635.08 1.8
Project No QCMMP/EM58M/2017/1 Start Date 13-02-2017 End Date 15-05-2017 E Sivakumar Member
Meeting Day Monday 14:30 to 15:30 No. of Projects Completed 2 N Chetan Member
S. No. Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Target Actual
1 Defining the Problem 27-02-2017 27-02-2017
70
13- Abstract
Methodology / Tool / Technique Used-
5W&1H
71
72
Abstract
What was the problem?
High deviation and poor surface finish
Where was the problem?
Bearing Shell Spherical
When did the problem arise ?
While machining of Bearing Shell
Who has noticed the problem?
Machine operator and Quality Inspector
Why did the Problem arise?
Excess overhang length of machine RAM and Excess length of rotary table
How was the problem solved?
A fixture plate manufactured
73
74
Future Plans
Target
Problems Category Status
Date
75