Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diplomacy
Diplomacy
Diplomacy
POL S 422 1
Success & failure in green
diplomacy
Toxic Waste Trade
Whaling
Acid Rain
CITES
Ozone Depletion
Climate Change
POL S 422 2
Lessons Learned
Lead states/laggard states
Importance of nonstate actors
Importance of organizational structure
Importance of symbolic politics
Least common denominator
Strengths of convention/protocol
Allows incremental progress
Works well for simple issues
Weaknesses of convention/protocol
Works less well for complex issues
Role of U.S.
POL S 422 3
Institutional Problems
Weakness of UNEP
Physical & political isolation
Under-funded
Dominant economic institutions downplay
environment
WTO, World Bank, IMF
Business
A World Environment Organization?
POL S 422 4
Three Alternative Futures
Business-as-usual
Liberal environmentalism
Fortress World
Rich protect themselves
Securitizing energy
Global Transformation
Addresses the intertwined dimensions of the
global problematique
Inequity, violent conflict, environmental
degradation
Evidence for all three
POL S 422 5
Liberal environmentalism
Business-as-usual
Proliferation of agreements & institutions
Hundreds of treaties since Stockholm,
yet environmental conditions worsen
Green diplomacy embedded in ideology of
growth
Voluntary initiatives emphasized over
binding commitments
POL S 422 6
Capitalism, Globalization and
Ecology
Market logic
Economic efficiency: cheap labor &
materials
Market expansion: growth imperative
Profit motive: short time horizon
Ex: Banking industry & renewable energy
POL S 422 8
Green Politics Beyond the State
Subnational initiatives
States, cities, neighborhoods
Voluntary & Type-2 Initiatives
Pew Center on Global Climate Change; ISO 14001;
Forestry Stewardship Council; Marine Stewardship
Council
Green investment
Climate & insurance industry
Earth Charter
Declaration of Interdependence
Exemplary mobilization
City Repair
Global Ecovillage movement
Lifestyle politics
POL S 422 9
Addressing the Root Causes
What underlies I= PAT?
What are the causes of exponential
growth?
Social structures
POL S 422 10