This document discusses electoral systems and voting in Canada. It begins by outlining the election process, which starts with dissolution and ends with voting. It then explains that Canada uses a first-past-the-post system where the candidate with the most votes in each riding wins that seat. While first-past-the-post provides stability through majority governments, proportional representation would see smaller parties gain more opportunities. The document also introduces the concept of mixed-member representation and STV as alternative voting systems.
This document discusses electoral systems and voting in Canada. It begins by outlining the election process, which starts with dissolution and ends with voting. It then explains that Canada uses a first-past-the-post system where the candidate with the most votes in each riding wins that seat. While first-past-the-post provides stability through majority governments, proportional representation would see smaller parties gain more opportunities. The document also introduces the concept of mixed-member representation and STV as alternative voting systems.
This document discusses electoral systems and voting in Canada. It begins by outlining the election process, which starts with dissolution and ends with voting. It then explains that Canada uses a first-past-the-post system where the candidate with the most votes in each riding wins that seat. While first-past-the-post provides stability through majority governments, proportional representation would see smaller parties gain more opportunities. The document also introduces the concept of mixed-member representation and STV as alternative voting systems.
In the sequence of elections we start with dissolution followed by
enumeration, then nomination. Campaigning came next followed by voting!
In Canada we use first-past-the-post
In every riding, the candidate that wins the highest number of votes wins the right to represent that particular seat in the House of Commons. The winner does not need an absolute majority — i.e., more than 50 per cent of the votes cast in the riding. Why? Experts suggest first-past-the-post provides for more stability whereas PR would likely result in more coalition governments With the expectation being that coalition governments would fall more easily It is swiftly completed and facilitates majority governments The fear is that dividing up Commons according to each party's share of the vote would make it more difficult for any one party to amass a majority of seats. People have an MP (or MLA) that is accountable to the electorate because they could lose their seat in the next election Major parties benefit from FPTP because they are more likely to have more power
PR means that smaller
parties have more opportunities to take part What about proportional representation? This is seen as a more fair way of electing governments but there is a great deal of fear around it
Coalition governments means that the
parties have to work together rather than focus on combatting each other Mixed Member Representation is one form of PR Voters want every vote to count, but they also want an MP who has a personal connection to their riding. With MMP you get a bit of both worlds: one ballot, two votes. One vote is for your choice of local candidate and it works exactly the way elections work now: the candidate with the most votes wins. Your second vote is for the party of your choice. The parties will have a ranked list of candidates who will be elected in order based on this vote. The votes are tallied and the proportion of votes determines how many of these seats each party gets What about STV?
Currently one CANDIDATE wins the SEAT in their RIDING (or
CONSTITUENCY) That person is an MP (MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT) if they are at the federal level and an MLA (MEMBER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY) at the provincial level In Canada, we do NOT directly vote for our federal or provincial leaders (PRIME MINISTER and PREMIER respectively) The PRIME MINISTER is the leader of the party that forms government because the won the most SEATS in the House of Commons
Evaluate The Argument That The FPTP Electoral System Should Be Scrapped and Replaced With A More Proportional Electoral System (30) Politics Explained Essay Plan