PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF

SOREANG TRADITIONAL MARKET

Case Study

Astri Shofiyastri R
145244006

D4 MANAJEMEN ASET
2018
1 Background
2 Research Objectives

3 Grand Theory
4 References
5 Research object
6 Methodology
7 Data collection tehnique

8 Variable Operationalization

9 Result and discussion

7
10 Problem definition
7
11
8 Recommendation
There were several empty stalls of
merchants, so market revenew was
not optimal.

The zoning of Pasar Soreang was not

functioning anymore. So, In one zone
there is no merchant of the same type
of goods

Condition of Pasar Soreang was dirty

and building was damaged. So,
Building is not worth to use.
 1 2

Evaluation Identify existing

performance of Pasar problems in Pasar
Soreang Kabupaten Soreang Kabupaten
Bandung based on Bandung based on
categories financial, the emerging
physical, functional phenomenon.
and survey based.
 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT
According to Lavy dkk (2010) Key Performance Indicators
was arranged under following the four categories

Financial indicators
1

Physical indicators
2
Functional indicators

3 Survey-based indicators
 SNI 8125: 2015 about Pasar Rakyat consists of:
Persyaratan Persyaratan Teknis
Umum
1. Ukuran
19.
11. Tempat luas dagang
Ruang disinfektan
penyimpangan bahan
1. Lokasi 2. Jumlah
28. Pengujian
pangan
20. Area basahposlimbah
ukur ulang
penghijauan
bersuhu cair
2. Kebersihan 3. Zonasi
29. Ketersediaan
rendah/lemari
21. Tinggi tempat sampah
anakpendingin
tangga
dan kesehatan 4. Area
12.
22.
30. Tempat
Tinggi
Alat parkir
meja
angkutcucisampah
tempat
tangan penjualan
3. Keamanan 5. Area
31.
13.
dari lantaibongkar
Tempat
Ruang muat sampah
pembuangan
menyusui
dan 6. Akses
CCTV untuk
sementara
14.
23. Akses untuk masuk dan
kursi roda
kenyamanan 15. keluar
24.
32. Ruang
Jalur kendaraan
evakuasi
peribadatan
Pengelolaan sampah
7. Lebar
berdasarkan
16.
25. Tabung koridor
Pos kesehatan3R
pemadam kebakaran
8. Kantor
33.
17.
26. Sarana pengelola
Pos keamanan
Hidran telekomunikasi
air
9. Lokasi
18.
27. Area
Pengujiantoiletkualitas
merokok dan kamar mandi
air bersih
10.Jumlah toilet pada satu lokasi
Pasar Soreang
Luas lahan : 15.410 m2
Luas bangunan : 5.688 m2
Jumlah IPK : 733 pedagang
Jumlah IPL : 447 pedagang

Pasar Soreang
Gerbang Utama Tampak Atas
Pasar Soreang
Sumber: Google Earth
Research method:
Descriptive method

Type of approach:
Quantitative approach and qualitatif
approach
1 Scientific observation

2 Interview

3 Study documentation
 Variables Sub. Variabel Indicators

1.1 Income
2.1 Physical condition
2.2 Waste
2.3 Security
2.4 Indoor quality environment
1. Financial
2.5 Accessible for difable
2. Physical
2.6 Source of energy
Performance 3. Functional
2.7 Location
4. Survey-based
3.1 Parking
3.2 Space of utilization
3.3 Mission and vission
3.4 Adequecy of space
4.1 Customer/building occupants with
product
 1. Financial Indicators
No Jenis Jumlah Retribusi Pendapatan seharusnya Pendapatan riil
yang harus
Analisys
dibayarkan
1 Sembako 200 3000 Rp 600.000 Rp 423.000
2 Alat-alat Rumah 200 3000 Rp 600.000 Rp 600.000
Tangga:
3 Kios and Lapak
Daging 43 used3000 Kios
Rp and129.000
Lapak available
Rp 123.000
4 Sandang 330 3000 Rp 990.000 Rp 990.000
5 674 kios and 10445 lapak
Warung 2000 733Rpkios and
20.000447 lapakRp 18.000
6. Perhiasan 22 3000 Rp 66.000 Rp 66.000
7. Revenue
Kayu, bambu dan 5 3000 Revenue potential
Rp 15.000 Rp 15.000
sejenisnya
8. Rp 1.182.600.000
Bunga-bungaan 10 2000 Rp Rp
1.249.200.000
20.000 Rp 20.000
dan sejenisnya
9. Rokok 100 3000 Rp 300.000 Rp 300.000
10. Tukang kulit/ 50 2000 Rp 100.000 Rp 100.000
penjahit/arloji dan
sejenisnya
11. Sepeda dan 10 3000 Rp 30.000 Rp 30.000
sejenisnya
12. Perkantoran/gudan 200 3000 Rp 600.000 Rp 600.000
g
11. Pendapatan per Rp 3.470.000 Rp 3.285.000
hari
12. Pendapatan per Rp 104.100.000 Rp 98.550.000
bulan
11. Pendapatan per Rp 1.249.200.000 Rp 1.182.600.000
tahun
2. Physical Indicators
No Criteria Standard Existing
1 Condition of
building
2 Waste
3 Security
4 Indoor
quality
environment
5 Accessibility
for disability
6 Source of
energy
7 Location
2. Physical Indicators
3. Functional Indicators
No Criteria Standard Existing
1 Parking
2 Space
utilization
3 Mission and
vission
4 Adequacy of
space
4. Survey-based Indicators

No Name Satisfaction
1 Ibu Norma (Pedagang) 2
2 Ibu Euis (Pengunjung) 3
3 Ibu Titi (Pengunjung) 2
There is a mismatch between performance of
Pasar Soreang with the standard:
1. financial category that income is not optimal
yet
2. physical categories do not fit the standard
because there are some facilities that did
not exist even there damage and cannot be
accessed by disability
3. Functional condition was no parking place
and zoning of the market does not function
4. Survey-based merchants and consumers
was not satisfy to infrastructure of Pasar
Soreang
Planning revitalization Pasar
Soreang Kabupaten Bandung