Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 2 Report Persons and Family Relations 2017
Group 2 Report Persons and Family Relations 2017
Group 2 Report Persons and Family Relations 2017
• PATERNITY
• LEGITIMATE CHILDREN
• ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN
FILIATION PATERNITY
- The relation of a - The relation of the
child to his or her child to his or her
parent father
• LEGITIMATE CHILDREN • ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN
- Conceived and born either - Conceived and born
naturally or by artificial outside a valid marriage
insemination to a valid are illegitimate
marriage or to a void
marriage but is
considered legitimate by
law
Chapter 2 – Proof of Filiation
Article 172. The filiation of legitimate children is established by
any of the following:
1.) The record of birth appearing in the civil register or a final judgment; or
2.) An admission of legitimate filiation in a public document or a private
handwritten instrument and signed by the parent concerned.
In the absence of the foregoing evidence, the legitimate filiation shall be
proved by:
1.) The open and continuous possession of the status of a legitimate child; or
2.) Any other means allowed by the Rules of Court and special laws.
Birth Certificate
• Offers a prima facie evidence of filiation and a high
degree of proof is needed to overthrow the
presumption of truth contained in such public
document.
Prima Facie Evidence
• Establishes a fact but loses its
probative value once contradicted
by superior evidence.
Benitez – Badua vs. Court of
Appeals
G.R. No. 105625, Jan. 24, 1994
• A birth certificate to be considered as validating
proof of paternity and as an instrument of
recognition, must be signed by the father and
mother jointly, or by the mother alone if the
father refuses.
Angeles vs. Maglaya
G.R. No. 153798, Sept. 2, 2005
Baptismal Certificate
• A private document which is not a conclusive proof of
filiation. It does not have the same probative value as a
record of birth, an official or public document.
Cabais vs. Court of Appeals
G.R. Nos. 1O6314-15, Oct. 8, 1999
“Any other means allowed by the Rules of Court
and special laws.”
• Child’s baptismal certificate
• A judicial admission
• A family bible in which the child’s name has been entered
• Common reputation respecting the child’s pedigree
• Admission by silence
• Testimony of witness
• Other kinds of proof of admission under Rule 130 of the
Rules of Court
• Letters to the mother vowing to be a good father
to the child and pictures of the putative father
cuddling the child on various occasions, together
with the certificate of live birth proved filiation
DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) Test
Results
• In assessing the probative value of DNA evidence,
courts should consider, inter alia, the following factors:
how the samples were collected, how they were
handled, the possibility of contamination of the
samples, the procedure followed in analyzing the
samples, whether proper standards and procedures
were followed in conducting the tests, and the
qualification of the analyst who conducted the tests.
Herrera vs. Alba
G.R. No. 162571, June 15 2OO5
Article 174. Legitimate children shall have the
right:
1.) To bear the surnames of the father and the mother, in
conformity with the provisions of the Civil Code on
Surnames;
2.) To receive support from their parents, their
ascendants, and in proper cases, their brothers and
sisters, in conformity with the provisions of this Code
on Support;
Illegitimate Children
Title VI: Paternity & Filiation
Mark Dela Cruz
Art. 175. Illegitimate children may establish their illegitimate filiation
in the same way and on the same evidence as legitimate children.
The action must be brought within the same period specified in Art.
173, except when the action is based on the second paragraph of Art.
172, in which case the action may be brought during the lifetime of
the alleged parent.
Illegitimate children may establish filiation
the same way as legitimate children.
action brought same period in Art.
173, except second paragraph of Art.
172, action brought lifetime of
the alleged parent.
Prescription (General Rule)
• Lifetime of child
Transmissible
Proofs of Establishment ⁺ Died a minor
⁺ Insane
•Birth Certificate ⁺ Within five (5) years
•Admission:
Public Document
Private (by hand; signed)
•Others:
Open, continuous
possession of status
Other means allowed by
Rules of Court Prescription (Exception)
• Lifetime of the alleged
parent
Procedural Aspects for Filiation (Herrera vs Alba)
• Prima facie case
A valid, probable case, unless proven otherwise
• Affirmative defenses
Burden of proof shifts
• Presumption of legitimacy
• Physical resemblance
Effect of Age in Action of Filiation
Point of Similarity or Uyguanco vs CA Bernabe vs Alejo
Contrast
Proof of Filiation Exception Exception
Age Prior FC Age of Majority Minority
Right to Action Absent Present
Laws Applicable Art. 175 (FC) – establish filiation Art. 175 (FC) – establish filiation
Art. 172 (FC) – decide prescription Art. 172 (FC) – decide prescription
Art. 256 (FC) – disclaimer of repeal Art. 256 (FC) – disclaimer of repeal
of certain provisions of NCC of certain provisions of NCC
Art. 285 (NCC) – prescription of action for Art. 285 (NCC) – prescription of action for
natural children natural children
JUR. 72 SCRA 307 – action also for spurious
children
Written
Fernandez
DeHeirs of Documents
Nepomuceno
Castro
Potenciano
Dela CruzvsvsDe
Fernandez
Cabaisvs vs CA
Lopez
Castro
Reynoso
Gracia
Facts
Facts:
Facts:
• •Facts:
Birth Certificate
Petitioner and (De Castro were
respondent vs Desweethearts,
Castro) mates
•••• Petitioner
Petitioner,
Petitioner,
Respondent predeceased
left with
respondent
gave birth
gave by
property her
by mother,
recognized
unmarried
birth unmarried.adoptive
as inherits
parents
illegitimate
Contends land of his
children
petitioner is in will
father
• •Last will
Planned and
grandmother testament
by right
marriage; (Potenciano
of representation.
eventually voided. vs Reynoso)
Did(innot cohabit afterwards
••• (Greedy)
Their
Her respondents
father
common-law
Petitioner executed
makes contends
a
husband deed for
wrote
a handwritten no
the
a
notefiliation
lot
handmade was
will)
promising made
in
letter favor of petitioner
acknowledging
to support
•••Other Public
Respondents
Respondent document
however
gave birth; (Fernandez
present
asks a vs Fernandez)
baptismal
support from certificate.
petitioner It didchild.
not
child;
provideno
••• Petitioner
Respondent affixed
submits signature.
contends
petitioner’s against
baptismal
grandmother the
cert., sale;
as petitioner
application
her mom’s for avers
backno
mother. payfiliation
of father
Respondent
• •Private asserts
handwriting such
(Dela note
Cruz proves
vs filiation
Gracia) no acknowledgment
Petitioner
•• Husband’s
made; thuscontends
no
family they never
personality
executed to
an cohabited;
sue.
affidavit ofentitled
acknowledgment
Respondents continued petitioner is not to the land since
• Written undertaking (Nepomuceno
document proves no filiation existed. vs Lopez)
Ruling:
Ruling:
•Ruling:
Church registers (Heirs of Cabais vs CA)
Ruling:
•• ItThe
is adocument,
public document;
though however its purpose
handwritten, does not
not for filiation
contain a categorical
•
Ruling:
Birth certificate
Filiation
• Though may be lists petitioner
established in as father.
wills
not tenable without signature, proof by pedigree supports
acknowledgment
•• Baptismal certificates dohusband’s
not establish filiation.
proof
In (testimony
affidavit
Petitioner regarding
and of the
tax
respondent ememption,
executed family)
petitioner
an affidavit admits
enjoininghe’sthe
thewill.
father
Other Written Documents
Chua
MarcaydavsvsCANaz Discussed
Facts:
•Facts:
Child’s report card (Delgado vs Rustia)
• Petitioner and respondent had illicit relations, which bore a child
••• Notarial
Petitioner
Respondent,
claims toon
agreement
a bar
be support
an acknowledged
passer, denies (Marcayda
the child.
natural
vs Naz)child
Petitioner
of her
threats to defer
deceased
admission mother
if no support was
• Other public document withmade
declaration of filiation (Chua vs CA)
• Parties
Petitioner presents
execute her mother’s
a notarial agreementSALN,
(with GSIS insurance,
admissions) Teacher’s
for support;
charges withdrawn
Federation forms.
• Months later, petitioner demand support. Respondent claims birth
certificate does not claim he’s the father.
Ruling:
Ruling:
• The proofs were of authentic writing, constituting voluntary
• recognition.
Notarial agreements (with all the admissions) on support are valid.
Recognition, Inheritance Joined (Tayag vs CA)
Facts:
• Private respondent claims for her child’s recognition and inheritance
from petitioner, administratrix of the deceased father of the child.
• Respondent provided letters of affection and love for child by father
• Petitioner contends because of form, action prescribed; recognition
and inheritance can not be joined.
Ruling:
• Prosecution of acknowledgment need not be concluded to file action
for inheritance
Allegation of Acknowledgment Not Required
(Tayag vs Gallor)
Facts:
• Respondent claims to be spurious child of petitioner’s late husband.
She also demands inheritance from father
• Petitioner contends lack of cause since no allegation of
acknowledgment was made
Ruling:
• Successional rights not only determined by judicial action for
recognition as proof of voluntary recognition may be shown.
When Judicial Action for Recognition Required
(Javier vs CA)
Facts:
• Petitioners are children of an acknowledged child of their grandpa
• They claim from respondents, trustees of their grandpa’s titles, such.
• Respondents contend their father was not recognized judicially or
voluntarily acknowledged
Ruling:
• Any proof of filiation other than usual means (birth certificate, will,
etc.; voluntary recognition) need judicial action for recognition
When Judicial Action for Recognition Required
(Javier vs CA)
Facts:
• Petitioners are children of an acknowledged child of their grandpa
• They claim from respondents, trustees of their grandpa’s titles, such.
• Respondents contend their father was not recognized judicially or
voluntarily acknowledged
Ruling:
• Any proof of filiation other than usual means (birth certificate, will,
etc.; voluntary recognition) need judicial action for recognition
Proper Case to Resolve Filiation (Agapay vs Palang)
Facts:
• Petitioner was a mistress of respondent’s husband
• Petitioner claims inheritance for his son, with claim of filiation in the
proceeding of recovery of ownership
Ruling:
• Claim of filiation should not be made on civil action such as recovery
of ownership, but in a proper probate proceeding
Open and Continuous
Perla vs Possession
Mendoza Baring
vs CA of Status
•Facts:
Open and continuous (Mendoza vs CA)
•• Acts
Private
Respondent
respondent
gavemust
of affection birth
claims
betocontinuous;
co-respondent.
she is an illegitimate
She
single actavers
childpetitioner
of petitioner
not continuous as dad
(Perla
• vs Baring)
Her
Co-respondent
proofs of filiation
says petitioner
revolves around
kissed and
continuous
hugged him
possession
upon meetup
of
• Continuous
status:
and promised
giving ofsupport
money,merely
possession calling apetitioner
ground to“Papa,”
compelmother claiming
(Delgado vs his
“Papa” is the one paying for education
Rustia)
Ruling:
Ruling:
• There must be continuous manifestation of affection and care; single
• “Continuous”
instance cannot does
be not
considered
necessarily
continuous
mean perpetual status as
illegitimate. It means that it is not “off-and-on,” intermittent
Physical Resemblance (Tijing vs CA)
Facts:
• Petitioner couples contended that private respondent, then their
laundrywoman, snatched their child
• Respondent claims such child is hers
Ruling:
• Court finds trial court’s observation tenable that petitioner and child
showed strong facial resemblance
Blood “Modern”
Types of Possible Children
Science inCA
Aid of Impossible
Filiation Children
Mates Jao vs
OXO O A, B, AB
Point
Facts: of Similarity or Blood Grouping DNA Testing
OXA O, A B, AB
Contrast
• Parties underwent a blood grouping. Confirmed non-paternity
OXB O, B A, AB
Process
• Parent-petitioner averredCrossmatching of they
cohabitation when Matching of genetic
had coitus
O X AB A, B O, AB
blood types between markers
AXA O, A B, AB
Ruling: parent and child
AXB O, A, B, AB
• Medical science
Utility have proven indisputable
Non-paternity result with Paternity
regard to non-
A X AB
paternity A, B, AB O
B X B happened after coitus.
• Cohabitation O, B Even if it were true, A,
it AB
cannot
reject scientific
B X AB fact. A, B, AB O
Legitimated Children
Title VI: Paternity & Filiation
Daniel Galzote
TITLE VI:
PATERNITY AND FILIATION
CHAPTER IV:
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Article 177
Only children conceived and born
outside of wedlock of parents who,
at the time of the conception of
the former, were not disqualified
by any impediment to marry each
other may be legitimated.
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Article 178
Legitimation shall take place by a
subsequent valid marriage
between parents. The annulment
of a voidable marriage shall not
affect the legitimation.
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
ILLUSTRATION
Born out of wedlock Born during a:
Valid Marriage
Legitimate Child
Illegitimate Child Legitimated Child
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
EXAMPLE On Jan 1, 2015,
Batman and Wonder
woman got married.
Jan 1, 2014
Joker was born
Joker is now a
Illegitimate child legitimated child
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Jan 1, 2014
Joker was born Joker is now a legitimated
child
On January 1, 2016, the marriage
was annulled due to no parental
consent, still Joker status is
Illegitimate child legitimated.
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Article 179
Legitimated children shall enjoy
the same rights as legitimate
children.
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
RIGHTS OF THE LEGITIMATE AND ILLEGITIMATE CHILD (SSS)
LEGITIMATE/LEGITIMATED ILLEGITIMATED
1. SURNAME uses surname of mother but the father’s
surname may be used if father has explicitly
Of the father and mother recognized the child as his (RA9255, Revilla
Law)
2. SUCCESSION
½ the share of a legitimate
Those granted in the Civil child
Code
3. SUPPORT
entitle to support but support will
In accordance with the come from separate properties of
provision of the Family Code parent
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Article 180
The effects of legitimation shall
retroact to the time of the child’s
birth.
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Article 181
The legitimation of children who
died before the celebration of the
marriage shall benefit their
descendants.
A dead child can be legitimated
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Article 182
Legitimation may be impugned
only by those who are prejudiced
in their rights, within five years from
the time their cause of action
accrues.
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Persons prejudiced:
The persons prejudiced are those
persons whose shares in the
amount of support or inheritance
are adversely affected by the
legitimation.
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
QUESTION:
Ms. A and Mr. B a high school graduating student
are boy friend and girlfriend happens to be in
hotel for several times, Ms. A got pregnant and
gave birth, what is the status of the child and
when can be the legitimation be process?
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
ANSWER
The child status is illegitimate, the child can only
be legitimated when the both parties entered into
a legal marriage provided that they will reach the
age of maturity as stated in Article 177 of the
family code. Retro act will took effect in this case,
once the valid marriage is contracted, the
legitimation effect during the birth of the child.
LEGITIMATED CHILDREN
Steps shall be taken by the Department to ensure that no hurried decisions are
made and all alternatives for the child’s future and the implications of each alternative
have been provided.
(b) Prospective Adoptive Parent(s) — Counseling
sessions, adoption for a and seminars, among others,
shall be provided to prospective adoptive parent(s) to
resolve possible adoption issues and to prepare
him/her for effective parenting.
(c) Prospective Adoptee — Counseling sessions shall
be provided to ensure that he/she understands the
nature and effects of adoption and is able to express
his/her views on adoption in accordance with his/her
age and level of maturity.
SEC. 5. Location of Unknown Parent(s). — It
shall be the duty of the Department or the child
placing or child-caring agency which has custody of
the child to exert all efforts to locate his/her unknown
biological parent(s). If such efforts fail, the child shall
be registered as a foundling and subsequently be the
subject of legal proceedings where he/she shall be
declared abandoned.
SEC. 6. Support Services. — The Department
shall develop a pre-adoption program which shall
include, among others, the above-mentioned services.
Article III: Eligibility
Title VII: Adoption
Jally Lacoto Alindo
Republic Act, No. 8552
"Domestic Adoption Act of 1998."
Outli
ne
• Who may adopt?
• Who may be adopted?
• Whose consent is necessary to
the adoption?
(Secs.7,8,9)
Sec. 7
Who may ELIGIBILITY OF PROSPECTIVE
ADOPTERS
(COMMON TO THE THREE)
adopt.
of legal age,
• ANY FILIPINO CITIZEN in possession of full civil capacity
• ANY ALIEN and legal rights,
• A GUARDIAN W/ of good moral character,
has not been convicted of any
RESPECT TO THE WARD crime involving moral turpitude,
emotionally and psychologically
capable of caring for children,
at least sixteen (16) years older
than the adoptee,
in a position to support and care
for his/her children in keeping
with the means of the family.
Sec. 7
Who may ELIGIBILITY
EXCEPTIONS:
If one spouse seeks to adopt the
GENERAL RULE: legitimate son/daughter of the other;
or
Husband and if one spouse seeks to adopt his/her
own illegitimate son/daughter:
wife shall
Provided, However, that the other
spouse has signified his/her consent
thereto; or
.
Rule on Joint
Adoption
CASE:
In Re: Petition for Adoption of Michelle P. Lim (and Michael
Jude P. Lim), G.R. Nos. 168992-93, May 21, 2009
EFFECTS OF ADOPTION:
Sever all legal ties between the biological parents and
adoptee
Deem the adoptee as a legitimate child of the adopter
Give adopter and adoptee reciprocal rights and
obligations arising from the relationship of parent and
child
Sec. 8
Who may be
adopted?
1. Any person below eighteen (18) years of age
2. The legitimate son/daughter of one spouse by the other
spouse;
3. An illegitimate son/daughter by a qualified adopter
4. A person of legal age
5. A child whose adoption has been previously rescinded; or
6. A child whose biological or adoptive parent(s) has died
Sec. 9
Whose consent is necessary to
the adoption.
1. The adoptee, if ten (10) years of age or over;
2. The biological parent(s) of the child, if known;
3. The legitimate and adopted sons/daughters of the
adopter(s) and adoptee, if any;
4. The illegitimate sons/daughters of the adopter
5. The spouse, if any, of the person adopting
Exception:
FUNCTIONS
Monitor the existence, number, and flow of children
legally available for adoption and prospective
adopter(s) so as to facilitate their matching
Maintain a nationwide information and
educational campaign on domestic adoption
Keep records of adoption proceedings
Generate resources to help child-caring and
child-placing agencies and foster homes
maintain viability
Do policy research in collaboration with
the Intercountry Adoption Board and
other concerned agencies. The office
shall be manned by adoption experts
from the public and private sectors.
Section 24. Implementing Rules and
Regulations.
• Within six (6) months from the promulgation of this
Act, the Department, with the Council for the
Welfare of Children, the Office of Civil Registry
General, the Department of Justice, Office of the
Solicitor General, and two (2) private individuals
representing child-placing and child-caring agencies
shall formulate the necessary guidelines to make the
provisions of this Act operative
Section 25. Appropriations.
• Such sum as may be necessary for the
implementation of the provisions of this Act shall be
included in the General Appropriations Act of the
year following its enactment into law and thereafter.
Section 26. Repealing Clause.
• Any law, presidential decree or issuance, executive
order, letter of instruction, administrative order, rule,
or regulation contrary to, or inconsistent with the
provisions of this Act is hereby repealed, modified, or
amended accordingly.
Section 27. Separability Clause.
• If any provision of this Act is held invalid or
unconstitutional, the other provisions not affected
thereby shall remain valid and subsisting.
Section 28. Effectivity Clause
• This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days following
its complete publication in any newspaper of general
circulation or in the Official Gazette
Inter-Country Adoption Act of
1995 (R.A. No. 8043)
Title VII: Adoption
Abdul Rahman G. Macasundig
Chapter 2
Inter-Country
Adoption Act of 1995
(R.A. No. 8043)
o Fine of not less than Five thousand pesos (P5,000), but not more than Ten thousand pesos (P10,000) [at the
discretion of the court]
Section 17: Public Officers as Officers
Any government official, employee or functionary who shall
be found guilty of violating any of the provisions of this Act, or
who shall conspire with private individuals shall, in accordance
with existing civil service laws, rules and regulations: Provided,
that upon the filing of a case, either administrative or criminal,
said government official, employee or functionary concerned
shall automatically suffer suspension until the resolution of
the case.