The document discusses best practices for sharing assessment results. It emphasizes that sharing results is an important part of the assessment process that requires planning. When sharing results, presenters should ensure the information is objective, unambiguous, clear, and tailored to the audience. Graphs and tables should be easy to understand, and negative results should be discussed constructively by focusing on suggestions for improvement rather than blame.
The document discusses best practices for sharing assessment results. It emphasizes that sharing results is an important part of the assessment process that requires planning. When sharing results, presenters should ensure the information is objective, unambiguous, clear, and tailored to the audience. Graphs and tables should be easy to understand, and negative results should be discussed constructively by focusing on suggestions for improvement rather than blame.
The document discusses best practices for sharing assessment results. It emphasizes that sharing results is an important part of the assessment process that requires planning. When sharing results, presenters should ensure the information is objective, unambiguous, clear, and tailored to the audience. Graphs and tables should be easy to understand, and negative results should be discussed constructively by focusing on suggestions for improvement rather than blame.
and must be considered as seriously as the assessment itself” (Suskie, 2009) SHARING RESULTS
•Collecting and analyzing data is not the end of an assessment.
•Assessment should be to better a program, not just collect the results. •The process of sharing results takes planning and coordination. •Results should be objective and unambiguous and clear. • Information should be individualized based on audience, desired action and timing. CONTINUED… •Graphical displays of data, used appropriately, can enhance the message. •When reporting, different methods are better for different groups. •Conclusion and recommendations should connect to the results that are reported. •Individuals biases should be recognized and mitigated. TIMING •Timing is always important and crucial for success. •Consider current campus events, depending on what is happening on campus results will be welcomed, ignored or criticized. •Not every assessment will have a large interest if there are larger issues on campus. Ex: exam week •In making recommendations, assessors also have to consider their timeliness. ADDRESSING SHORTCOMINGS •No assessment is perfect, but they can always be useful. •Not all are generalizable, or have the response rate that is expected •Use the data gathered and use it the best one can •Use clear and understandable language depending on audience. •Avoid Jargon •Only use decimals when speaking to those who want that precise data (science/math departments) METHODS OF SHARING •Sharing should depend on the audience •For administration: 1-2 page reports •Surveys: Divided into smaller sections. Ex: page summary for each area of analysis •Reports: Published in peer reviewed journals •Technology: Website, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, etc. •On campus: Fliers, email blasts, posters, etc. •Presentations: explain methodology, name graphs and tables, give time for questions and answers PORTRAYING RESULTS VISUALLY •Give each table and graph a meaningful, self explanatory title •Label each part of graph clearly •Group results •Show obvious trends •Simplify tables •Point to the part of graph you are discussing SHARING NEGATIVE RESULTS •Use language that does not put blame on any person or group •Highlight “suggestions” instead of “solutions” •Explain action points to improve results instead of discussing negative results CONCLUSION •Know your audience •Clarity is key! •Graphs must be relevant and simple •Reports need to be concise •Leave time for questions